Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Fam Stud. 2017 Nov 9;27(4):1029–1040. doi: 10.1007/s10826-017-0948-5

Table 5.

Validity Analyses: Prediction of Adult Outcomes from Prospecting and Retrospective Reports

Well-being Closeness Support to Parent Support to Child
Prosp Retro Inter Prosp Retro Inter Prosp Retro Inter Prosp Retro Inter
Cohesion   .13   .10 −.00     .28*   .28+   .06         .39***     .42*** −.13      .32**     .39*** −.04
Organization −.00 −.01   .14 −.12 .14 −.01 −.01 .23* −.04 −.09 .23* −.09
Independence       .22**     .18+ −.05 −.02 −.03 −.08 −.00 −.27** −.00 .04 −.19+ .00
Expressiveness   .11    .25*   .14 −.01 .17 −.09   .02 .16 −.09 .00   .21* .03
Ach orientation −.05 −.06 −.04 −.21* .05   .09 −.21* .17 .14   −.33**   .18+ .12
Control   .12 −.16 −.03 .03 .04 −.13 .11 .18+ −.28** .02 .09 −.06
Conflict −.13 .08 −.09 −.30* −.20+ −.06    −.34*** −.24* −.09 −.26* −.22* −.05

Prosp: Prospective score; Retro: retrospective score; Inter: interaction of prospective and retrospective scores (centered)

Closeness: G2 (adult child) report of closeness to G1 (elder parent); Support to parent: G2 report of support to G1; Support to child: G2 report of support from G1

Table entries are standardized regression coefficients. N = 88;

+

p <.10;

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001