Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 5;12(6):e0006545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006545

Table 2. Data extracted from the included studies in the meta-analysis for an association between toxoplasmosis and RA.

No Reference N Case: RA+ (n) Control: RA- (n) RA+ & T+ (n, %) RA- & T+ (n, %) OR (95% CI) P-value
1 Shapira Y [14] (Latin America) 292 152 140 55 (36.18%) 50 (35.71%) 1.02 (0.62–1.70) NS
2 Shapira Y [14] (Europe) 332 35 297 27 (77.14%) 77 (25.93%) 9.64 (4.02–25.44) < 0.0001
3 Kuba RH [27] (Treated) 344 294 50 98 (33.33%) 6 (12%) 3.67 (1.48–10.86) < 0.05
4 Kuba RH [27] (Untreated) 100 50 50 18 (36%) 6 (12%) 4.13 (1.36–13.97) < 0.05
5 Al kalaby RF [22] 69 44 25 23 (52.27%) 5 (20%) 4.38 (1.26–17.31) 0.01
6 El-Sayed NM [25] 150 100 50 54 (54%) 16 (32%) 2.49 (1.16–5.47) S
7 Flegr J [26] 1320 301 1019 6 (46.15%) 295 (22.57%) 2.94 (0.81–10.30) 0.012
8 El- Henawy AA [24] 120 60 60 46 (76.67%) 29 (48.3%) 3.51 (1.50–8.35) < 0.001
9 Tian A-L [28] 1058 157 901 59 (24.79%) 98 (11.59%) 2.43 (1.66–3.53) < 0.001
10 Al- Oqaily MA [23] 308 258 50 95 (36.82) 0 (0%) 58.99 (7.35-infinity) < 0.0001

N and n: Number, CI: Confidence interval; RA+: People with rheumatoid arthritis; RA-: People without rheumatoid arthritis; RA+ & T+: People with rheumatoid arthritis and Toxoplasma positive; RA- & T+: People without rheumatoid arthritis and Toxoplasma positive; OR: Odds ratio; NS: Not significant; S: Significant