Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2018 Jun 14;6(24):e01602-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01602-17

Complete Genome Sequences of Paenibacillus larvae Phages BN12, Dragolir, Kiel007, Leyra, Likha, Pagassa, PBL1c, and Tadhana

Jamison K Walker a, Bryan D Merrill a, Jordan A Berg a, Aziza Dhalai b, Douglas W Dingman c, Chris P Fajardo a, Kiel Graves a, Hunter L Hill a, Jared A Hilton a, Cameron Imahara b, Bradley K Knabe a, James Mangohig b, Josh Monk b, Heejin Mun b, Ashley M Payne a, Alicia Salisbury b, Casey Stamereilers b, Kathie Velez b, Andy T Ward a, Donald P Breakwell a, Julianne H Grose a, Sandra Hope a, Philippos K Tsourkas b,
PMCID: PMC6003738  PMID: 29903825

ABSTRACT

We present here the complete genomes of eight phages that infect Paenibacillus larvae, the causative agent of American foulbrood in honeybees. Phage PBL1c was originally isolated in 1984 from a P. larvae lysogen, while the remaining phages were isolated in 2014 from bee debris, honeycomb, and lysogens from three states in the USA.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The Gram-positive bacterium Paenibacillus larvae is the causative agent of American foulbrood, currently the most destructive bacterial disease affecting the honeybee, Apis mellifera (1). With the rise of antibiotic-resistant strains of P. larvae (2), there is growing interest in phages that infect this pathogen. The first P. larvae phages were isolated in the 1950s (3), and the first complete P. larvae genome was published in 2013 (4). There are currently 18 complete P. larvae phage genomes in the literature (47). Here, we present eight complete P. larvae phage genomes obtained from samples across the United States. The phages’ GenBank accession numbers, isolation sources, geographical provenance, and assembly results are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

P. larvae phages, GenBank accession numbers, and genome assembly results

Phage name GenBank accession no. Isolation source Location Genome length (bp) GC content (%)
BN12 MG727695 Bee debris Cedar City, Utah, USA 39,485 42.6
Dragolir MG727697 Bee debris Wisconsin, USA 41,131 44
Kiel007 MG727696 Bee debris Salt Lake City, Utah, USA 37,985 41.8
Leyra MG727701 Bee debris Idaho, USA 42,276 41.4
Likha MG727702 Honeycomb American Fork, Utah, USA 39,778 41.3
Pagassa MG727699 P. larvae lysogen Provo, Utah, USA 40,035 42
PBL1c MG727698 P. larvae lysogen Iowa City, Iowa, USA 40,611 41.2
Tadhana MG727700 P. larvae lysogen Provo, Utah, USA 37,880 42.1

Phage PBL1c was isolated from a lysogen in 1984 by Dingman et al. (8) but was not sequenced until 2018 at Brigham Young University (BYU). The remaining seven phages were isolated over the period 2014 to 2016 from samples from the USA states of Utah, Idaho, and Wisconsin (Table 1) as part of the Phage Hunters course at BYU.

The phages were isolated from bee debris, honeycomb, and lysogens and amplified in P. larvae field isolates. Phage genomic DNA was isolated from high-titer lysates using Norgen phage DNA isolation kits (Norgen Biotek, Thorold, ON, Canada). Phage genomes were sequenced in the BYU DNA Sequencing Center using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina, Hayward, CA, USA) and were assembled using Geneious 8 software (Biomatters Inc., Newark, NJ, USA).

All nine phages are members of the family Siphoviridae with linear double-stranded DNA genomes. The DNA packaging strategy was identified as “cohesive ends with 3′ overhangs,” as explained in references 9 and 10. The overhangs were identified by sequence similarity with previously published phages (37). The overhangs are “CGACTGCCC” for phages BN12, Kiel007, Leyra, Likha, Pagassa, PBL1c, and Tadhana, and “CGACGGACC” for phage Dragolir. The genomes were rearranged by setting the first base of the genome to be the base immediately after the 3′ overhang.

Genome length is in the 37 kb to 42 kb range, and the G+C content was in the 41 to 44% range, consistent with 3′ cohesive ends for P. larvae phages (11). Preliminary analysis shows that phages Pagassa and Tadhana are closely related to each other, with the other phages slightly more distant; phage Dragolir was shown to be an outlier. All eight phages encode a large terminase, a major tail protein, two tail assembly proteins, a tail tape measure protein, and an N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase, among others. The tail assembly proteins appear to have a programmed translational frameshift similar to the G and G-T genes of phage lambda (12, 13), located in the 3′ region of gp12 (the upstream tail assembly protein). We tentatively identified the heptanucleotide slippery sequence as “AAAAAAG” in phages BN12, Kiel007, Likha, Leyra, Pagassa, PBL1c, and Tadhana, and possibly “AAAAAAC” in phage Dragolir. Future studies will investigate this and other features of P. larvae phage genomes and also provide a detailed comparative genomic analysis of these and other P. larvae phages.

Accession number(s).

The genome sequences of the P. larvae phages reported here have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

A.D., A.S., C.S., and P.K.T. are supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences GM103440 (NV INBRE). S.H. acknowledges Edwin Wilcox at the BYU DNA Sequencing Center.

Footnotes

Citation Walker JK, Merrill BD, Berg JA, Dhalai A, Dingman DW, Fajardo CP, Graves K, Hill HL, Hilton JA, Imahara C, Knabe BK, Mangohig J, Monk J, Mun H, Payne AM, Salisbury A, Stamereilers C, Velez K, Ward AT, Breakwell DP, Grose JH, Hope S, Tsourkas PK. 2018. Complete genome sequences of Paenibacillus larvae phages BN12, Dragolir, Kiel007, Leyra, Likha, Pagassa, PBL1c, and Tadhana. Genome Announc 6:e01602-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01602-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.de Graaf DC, Alippi AM, Antúnez K, Aronstein KA, Budge G, De Koker D, De Smet L, Dingman DW, Evans JD, Foster LJ, Fünfhaus A, Garcia-Gonzalez E, Gregore A, Human H, Murray KD, Nguyen BK, Poppinga L, Spivak M, van Engelsdorp D, Wilkins S, Genersch E. 2013. Standard methods for American foulbrood research. J Apic Res 52:1–28. doi: 10.3896/IBRA.1.52.1.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Miyagi T, Peng CYS, Chuang RY, Mussen EC, Spivak MS, Doi RH. 2000. Verification of oxytetracycline-resistant American foulbrood pathogen Paenibacillus larvae in the United States. J Invertebr Pathol 75:95–96. doi: 10.1006/jipa.1999.4888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gochnauer TA. 1955. The isolation of a bacteriophage (bacterial virus) from Bacillus larvae. Bee World 36:101–103. doi: 10.1080/0005772X.1955.11094880. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oliveira A, Melo LDR, Kropinski AM, Azeredo J. 2013. Complete genome sequence of the broad-host-range Paenibacillus larvae phage phiIBB_Pl23. Genome Announc 1(5):e00438-13. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00438-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Carson S, Bruff E, DeFoor W, Dums J, Groth A, Hatfield T, Iyer A, Joshi K, McAdams S, Miles D, Miller D, Oufkir A, Raynor B, Riley S, Roland S, Rozier H, Talley S, Miller ES. 2015. Genome sequences of six Paenibacillus larvae Siphoviridae phages. Genome Announc 3(3):e00101-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00101-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Beims H, Wittmann J, Bunk B, Spröer C, Rohde C, Günther G, Rohde M, von der Ohe W, Steinert M. 2015. Paenibacillus larvae-directed bacteriophage HB10c2 and its application in American foulbrood-affected honey bee larvae. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:5411–5419. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00804-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tsourkas P, Yost D, Krohn A, Leblanc L, Zhang A, Stamereilers C, Amy PS. 2015. Complete genome sequences of nine phages capable of infecting Paenibacillus larvae, the causative agent of American foulbrood disease of honeybees. Genome Announc 3(5):e01120-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01120-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dingman DW, Bakhiet N, Field CC, Stahly DP. 1984. Isolation of two bacteriophages from Bacillus larvae, PBL1 and PBL0.5, and partial characterization of PBL1. J Gen Virol 65:1101–1105. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-65-6-1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Casjens SR, Gilcrease EB. 2009. Determining DNA packaging strategy by analysis of the termini of the chromosomes in tailed-bacteriophage virions, p. 91–111. In Clokie MRJ, Kropinski AM (ed), Bacteriophages: methods and protocols, volume 2: molecular and applied aspects. Humana Press, New York, NY. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-565-1_7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Merrill BD, Ward AT, Grose JH, Hope S. 2016. Software-based analysis of bacteriophage genomes, physical ends, and packaging strategies. BMC Genomics 17:679. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3018-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stamereilers C, LeBlanc L, Yost D, Amy PS, Tsourkas PK. 2016. Comparative genomics of 9 novel Paenibacillus larvae bacteriophages. Bacteriophage 6:e1220349. doi: 10.1080/21597081.2016.1220349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xu J, Hendrix RW, Duda RL. 2004. Conserved translational frameshift in dsDNA bacteriophage tail assembly genes. Molecular Cell 16:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xu J, Hendrix RW, Duda RL. 2013. A balanced ratio of proteins from gene G and frameshift-extended gene GT is required for phage lambda tail assembly. J Mol Biol 425:3476–3487. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES