Table 3.
An Overview of the Type and Value of Quantitative Outcomes Featured in Those Studies that Described One Health Interventions to Address Salmonellosis Included in this Scoping Review.
| References | Geographical location | Intervention | Type of quantitative outcome described | Outcome reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goldbach and Alban (2006) | Denmark | Hot water decontamination of pig carcasses | Net present value | 3.5 million Euro over 15 years |
| Kangas et al. (2007) | Finland | Salmonella control policies in broiler production | Benefit–cost ratio | 0.04–21.25 |
| Korsgaard et al. (2009) | Denmark | Salmonella control programs in egg production | Number of human cases averted | 10,200 (95% CI: 8100–12,400) |
| Societal costs saved | 23.3 million Euro (95% CI: 16.3– 34.9) | |||
| Cost–benefit ratio | 0.5 | |||
| Miller et al. (2005) | USA | Pig vaccination | Reduction in human cases | 60% |
| Benefit–cost ratio | Less than 1 | |||
| Pig carcass rinsing at various water temperatures | Benefit–cost ratio | Greater than 1 | ||
| Persson and Jendteg (1992) | England, Wales and Sweden | Use of competitive exclusion in poultry production | Costs of illness saved | Up to 12.6 million GBP |
| Romero-Barrios et al. (2013) | European Union | Interventions on pig farms and during pig slaughter | Risk reduction | Up to 90% risk reduction |
| Wegener et al. (2003) | Denmark | Salmonella control programs in pig and poultry production | Costs saved | US $25.5 million |