Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul;17(7):587–596. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30195-9

Table 2.

Carotid artery restenosis or occlusion after stenting compared with endarterectomy

Stenting (n=737) Endarterectomy (n=793) Stenting vs endarterectomy
Unadjusted HR (95% CI) p value Adjusted HR (95%CI)* p value
At least moderate (≥50%) restenosis or occlusion
Total number of patients with outcome 274 217 1·43 (1·21–1·72) <0·0001 1·39 (1·14–1·69) 0·001
Cumulative 1-year incidence (95% CI) 27·8% (24·7–31·3) 21·0% (18·3–24·1) .. .. .. ..
Cumulative 5-year incidence (95% CI) 40·7% (36·9–44·8) 29·6% (26·3–33·2) .. .. .. ..
Severe (≥70%) restenosis or occlusion
Total number of patients with outcome 72 62 1·20 (0·86–1·69) 0·27 1·17 (0·83–1·67) 0·36
Cumulative 1-year incidence (95% CI) 6·9% (5·2–9·0) 5·2% (3·8–7·0) .. .. .. ..
Cumulative 5-year incidence (95% CI) 10·6% (8·4–13·3) 8·5% (6·7–10·9) .. .. .. ..

HR=hazard ratio.

*

Adjusted for baseline characteristics predictive of restenosis (appendix).