Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul;17(7):587–596. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30195-9

Table 4.

Association of severe (≥70%) carotid artery restenosis with subsequent outcome events

Both groups
Stenting
Endarterectomy
HR (95% CI) p value Events with restenosis (n/N) Events without restenosis (n/N) HR (95% CI) p value Events with restenosis (n/N) Events without restenosis (n/N) HR (95% CI) p value
Any stroke
Unadjusted 1·79 (0·64–4·99) 0·263 3/38 37/569 2·06 (0·63–6·82) 0·234 1/34 23/611 1·34 (0·18–10·10) 0·774
Adjusted* 1·64 (0·58–4·62) 0·346 3/38 37/569 1·96 (0·58–6·59) 0·278 1/34 23/611 1·35 (0·18–10·31) 0·772
Ipsilateral stroke
Unadjusted 1·66 (0·39–7·03) 0·489 1/38 18/569 1·37 (0·18–10·49) 0·761 1/34 13/611 2·20 (0·28–16·99) 0·450
Adjusted* 1·46 (0·34–6·22) 0·613 1/38 18/569 1·25 (0·16–9·80) 0·830 1/34 13/611 1·83 (0·23–14·56) 0·568

The first 30 days after a procedure, and patients with restenosis in the first 30 days, are excluded from this analysis. Patients were censored at the time of stroke or at any ipsilateral procedure during follow-up. HR=hazard ratio.

*

Adjusted for predictors of restenosis (appendix). Only participants with complete information on these baseline risk factors were included in the adjusted comparisons.