Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 7;9:421. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00421

Table 3.

Differences in complications due to differences in shunt treatment method (ventriculoperitoneal shunt vs. lumboperitoneal shunt).

VP shunt (n = 417) Number (%) LP shunt (n = 540) Number (%) p-value
Chronic subdural hematoma effusion (included acute subdural hematoma) 15 (1) 3.5 Chronic subdural hematoma 21 3.8 0.783
Shunt malfunction 11 2.6 Shunt malfunction 19 3.5 0.418
Infection 6 1.4 Hypotension headache 13 2.4 0.164
Hypotension headache 5 1.2 Low back·leg pain 12 2.2 0.302
Intracranial hematoma 2 0.5 Infection 4 0.7 0.445
Subcortical hematoma 1 0.2 Subcortical hematoma 3 0.5 0.862
Cerebral infarction 1 0.2 Cerebral thrombosis 1 0.2 0.862
Pneumothorax 1 0.2 Epigastric hernia 1 0.2
Epigastric hernia 1 0.2 Silicon allergy 1 0.2
Seizure 1 0.2
Difficulty elevating the shoulders 1 0.2
43 10.0% 77 14.1% 0.074

iNPH, idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus; VP, ventriculoperitoneal; LP, lumboperitoneal. Data represent the number and percentage. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction: deviation at the abdominal side of the shunt tube; lumboperitoneal shunt malfunction (n = 19): obstruction of the shunt tube at the lumbar spine side (n = 10) and at the abdominal side (n = 8); under-drainage (n = 1). We examined subjects to compare the complications using Pearson chi-square tests.