Table 3.

Comparison of significant differences for the two methods

Group	Sensor	BAV			AIM
		$\mathrm{\Delta }P$	$\mathrm{\Delta }P$ (95%CI)	$P$	$\mathrm{\Delta }P$	$\mathrm{\Delta }P$ (95%CI)	$P$
		(Pa)	(Pa), (Pa)		(Pa)	(Pa), (Pa)
1	Sensor 1	8.90	7.80, 9.98	0.00	9.12	7.87, 10.37	0.00
	Sensor 2
2	Sensor 1	8.52	7.46, 9.58	0.00	13.12	11.63, 14.61	0.00
	Sensor 3
3	Sensor 1	0.59	$-$0.46, 1.64	0.27	0.93	0.55, 2.11	0.17
	Sensor 4
4	Sensor 2	$-$0.37	$-$1.39, 0.65	0.47	2.16	1.56, 3.44	0.09
	Sensor 3
5	Sensor 2	8.30	7.30, 9.30	0.00	$-$7.19	$-$8.31, $-$6.07	0.00
	Sensor 4
6	Sensor 3	7.93	6.96, 8.90	0.00	$-$11.19	$-$12.58, $-$9.8	0.00
	Sensor 4