Skip to main content
. 2018 May 29;26(Suppl 1):193–203. doi: 10.3233/THC-174548

Table 3.

Classification performance comparison of different types of features among all competing methods and proposed method

Feature Method NC vs. PD vs. SWEDD
ACC (%) SEN (%) PREC (%) FSCORE (%) AUC (%)
GCD + CSF + DSSM Elastic net 70.33 ± 8.12 62.92 ± 28.09 54.03 ± 28.38 54.36 ± 21.38 87.15 ± 7.36
Lasso 70.20 ± 8.08 62.68 ± 29.61 58.07 ± 29.46 52.27 ± 20.57 86.94 ± 7.65
M3T 70.07 ± 7.99 62.60 ± 29.68 54.94 ± 28.78 49.88 ± 20.65 86.95 ± 7.69
Lei’s 72.57 ± 8.88 68.01 ± 29.41 53.93 ± 28.53 54.03 ± 22.62 89.29 ± 7.44
Proposed 78.37 ± 8.11 84.70 ± 19.29 66.73 ± 24.62 70.21 ± 18.51 94.20 ± 5.56