Table 8.
Variable | Base case | Worst case | Best case | Distribution | Data source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total costs | |||||
DC | $170 201 | $189 990 | $151 519 | Costing data | |
SC | $121 811 | $142 096 | $102 634 | ||
FFV | $138 754 | $164 824 | $114 984 | ||
Cases averted relative to CG | |||||
Wasting, DC | 35 | 6 | 52 | Analysis of effectiveness data | |
Stunting, DC | 132 | 41 | 214 | ||
Stunting, SC | 138 | 47 | 225 | ||
Stunting, FFV | 157 | 67 | 244 | ||
Cost per child | |||||
DC | $203 | Gamma | Costing data | ||
SC | $135 | ||||
FFV | $160 | ||||
Prevalence by intervention | |||||
Wasting, DC | 4.89% | Beta | Effectiveness data (Fenn et al. 2017) | ||
Wasting, control | 9.06% | ||||
Stunting, DC | 43.91% | ||||
Stunting, SC | 44.37% | ||||
Stunting, FFV | 41.49% | ||||
Stunting, control | 59.63% | ||||
DALYs | |||||
DC | $641 | $2941 | $289 | Log normal | Analysis of effectiveness data |
SC | $434 | $1420 | $197 | ||
FV | $563 | $2347 | $239 |
DC, double cash; SC, standard cash; FFV, fresh food voucher; DALYs, disability adjusted life years.