Table 9.
Changes in ICER from univariate sensitivity analyses varying cost and outcome parameters
| Model | Parameter | Base | Min | Max | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wasting | |||||
| DC | Costs | $4865 | $4329 | $5428 | $1099 |
| Outcome | $3273 | $28 367 | $25 094 | ||
| Stunting | |||||
| DC | Costs | $1290 | $1148 | $1439 | $291 |
| Outcome | $795 | $4151 | $3356 | ||
| SC | Costs | $882 | $744 | $1030 | $286 |
| Outcome | $541 | $2592 | $2050 | ||
| FFV | Costs | $883 | $732 | $1050 | $318 |
| Outcome | $569 | $2071 | $1502 | ||
| DALYs | |||||
| DC | Costs | $641 | $572 | $717 | $145 |
| Outcome | $324 | $2618 | $2294 | ||
| SC | Costs | $434 | $365 | $505 | $140 |
| Outcome | $234 | $1218 | $984 | ||
| FFV | Costs | $563 | $466 | $667 | $202 |
| Outcome | $288 | $1982 | $1694 | ||
ICER, incremental cost effectiveness ratio; DC, double cash; SC, standard cash; FFV, fresh food voucher.