Table 7.

Shows Pearson correlation analysis between the measurements

Correlations		HIA	HVA	DMAA	IMA	RL	MAA	TTA	MDTA
HIA	r	1	−0.254	−0.144	−0.387*	0.078	−0.011	−0.451*	−0.369*
	p		0.183	0.456	0.038	0.689	0.955	0.014	0.049
HVA	r	−0.254	1	0.608**	0.635**	0.132	−0.158	−0.017	−0.188
	p	0.183		0.000	0.000	0.494	0.413	0.932	0.329
DMAA	r	−0.144	0.608**	1	0.345	0.061	−0.353	−0.213	−0.418*
	p	0.456	0.000		0.067	0.752	0.060	−0.266	0.024
IMA	r	−0.387*	0.635**	0.345	1	−0.122	−0.242	0.112	0.016
	p	0.038	0.000	0.067		0.527	0.205	0.565	0.935
RL	r	0.078	0.132	0.061	−0.122	1	0.525**	0.383*	0.248
	p	0.689	0.494	0.752	0.527		0.003	0.040	0.195
MAA	r	−0.011	−0.158	−0.353	−0.242	0.525**	1	0.446*	0.490**
	p	0.955	0.413	0.060	0.205	0.003		0.015	0.007
TTA	r	−0.451*	−0.017	−0.213	0.112	0.383*	0.446*	1	0.920**
	p	0.014	0.932	−0.266	0.565	0.040	0.015		0.000
MDTA	r	−0.369*	−0.188	−0.418*	0.016	0.248	0.490**	0.920**	1
	p	0.049	0.329	0.024	0.935	0.195	0.007	0.000

^*correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)

^*correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

DMAA, distal metatarsal articular angle; HIA, hallux interphalangeal angle; HVA, hallux valgus angle; IMA, first and second intermetatarsal angle; MAA, metatarsus adductus angle; MDTA, medial distal tibial angle; p, significance; r, correlation coefficient; RL, first and second intermetatarsal relative length; TTA, tibiotalar angle