Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 1;12(3):218–226. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.12.170197

Table 8.

Shows Pearson correlation analysis between the measurements

Correlations TMA THA TCAA TCPA CP TTA MDTA
TMA r 1 0.876** 0.156 0.078 −0.693** −0.438* −0.561**
p 0.000 0.456 0.711 0.000 0.028 0.004
THA r 0.876** 1 0.437* 0.390 −0.551** −0.393 −0.563**
p 0.000 0.029 0.054 0.004 0.052 0.003
TCAA r 0.156 0.437* 1 0.876** 0.510* 0.073 −0.136
p 0.456 0.029 0.000 0.009 0.730 0.517
TCPA r 0.078 0.390 0.876** 1 0.440* −0.060 −0.186
p 0.711 0.054 0.000 0.028 0.777 0.374
CP r −0.693** −0.551** 0.510* 0.440* 1 0.443* 0.413*
p 0.000 0.004 0.009 0.028 0.026 0.040
TTA r −0.438* −0.393 0.073 −0.060 0.443* 1 0.920**
p 0.028 0.052 0.730 0.777 0.026 0.000
MDTA r −0.561** −0.563** −0.136 −0.186 0.413* 0.920** 1
p 0.004 0.003 0.517 0.374 0.040 0.000
*

correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)

**

correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

CP, calcaneal pitch angle; MDTA, medial distal tibial angle; p, significance; r, correlation coefficient; TCAA, talocalcaneal axis angle; TCPA, talo calcaneal pitch angle; THA, talo-horizontal angle; TMA, talo-first metatarsal angle; TTA: tibiotalar angle.