Table 9.
Shows Pearson correlation analysis between the measurements
| Correlations | HIA | HVA | DMAA | IMA | RL | MAA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMA | r | 0.438* | 0.248 | 0.617** | 0.008 | 0.168 | 0.398* | 
| p | 0.029 | 0.232 | 0.001 | 0.968 | 0.422 | 0.049 | |
| THA | r | 0.206 | 0.209 | 0.583** | 0.009 | 0.189 | −0.332 | 
| p | 0.323 | 0.317 | 0.002 | 0.964 | 0.365 | 0.105 | |
| TCAA | r | −0.296 | 0.073 | 0.355 | −0.256 | 0.289 | 0.169 | 
| p | 0.151 | 0.730 | 0.081 | 0.217 | 0.161 | 0.418 | |
| TCPA | r | −0.290 | −0.090 | 0.281 | −0.252 | 0.099 | 0.133 | 
| p | 0.159 | 0.670 | 0.174 | 0.225 | 0.639 | 0.528 | |
| CP | r | −0.472* | −0.132 | −0.228 | −0.247 | 0.087 | 0.475* | 
| p | 0.017 | 0.529 | 0.272 | 0.235 | 0.678 | 0.017 | 
correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)
correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)
CP, calcaneal pitch angle; DMAA, distal metatarsal articular angle; HIA, hallux interphalangeal angle; HVA, hallux valgus angle; IMA, first and second intermetatarsal angle; MAA, metatarsus adductus angle; p, significance; r, correlation coefficient; RL, first and second intermetatarsal relative length; THA, talo-horizontal angle; TMA, talo-first metatarsal angle; TCAA, talocalcaneal axis angle; TCPA, talocalcaneal pitch angle