Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 1;12(3):218–226. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.12.170197

Table 9.

Shows Pearson correlation analysis between the measurements

Correlations HIA HVA DMAA IMA RL MAA
TMA r 0.438* 0.248 0.617** 0.008 0.168 0.398*
p 0.029 0.232 0.001 0.968 0.422 0.049
THA r 0.206 0.209 0.583** 0.009 0.189 −0.332
p 0.323 0.317 0.002 0.964 0.365 0.105
TCAA r −0.296 0.073 0.355 −0.256 0.289 0.169
p 0.151 0.730 0.081 0.217 0.161 0.418
TCPA r −0.290 −0.090 0.281 −0.252 0.099 0.133
p 0.159 0.670 0.174 0.225 0.639 0.528
CP r −0.472* −0.132 −0.228 −0.247 0.087 0.475*
p 0.017 0.529 0.272 0.235 0.678 0.017
*

correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)

**

correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

CP, calcaneal pitch angle; DMAA, distal metatarsal articular angle; HIA, hallux interphalangeal angle; HVA, hallux valgus angle; IMA, first and second intermetatarsal angle; MAA, metatarsus adductus angle; p, significance; r, correlation coefficient; RL, first and second intermetatarsal relative length; THA, talo-horizontal angle; TMA, talo-first metatarsal angle; TCAA, talocalcaneal axis angle; TCPA, talocalcaneal pitch angle