Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2018 Mar;33(2):325–337. doi: 10.1037/pag0000228

Table 1. Characteristics of Older and Younger Adult Responders across Emotional Arousal Conditions.

Variable (M [SD] or %) Older Adults Younger Adults


HAP (n=23) HAN (n=22) LA (n=26) HAP (n=24) HAN (n=20) LA (n=24)
Age 74.09 (5.94) 72.59 (4.58) 74.54 (5.17) 34.42 (3.18) 34.15 (3.12) 34.83 (3.49)
Gender (% female) 60.9% 63.6% 61.5% 70.8% 45.0% 54.2%
Ethnicity (% non-Hispanic)* 95.7% 95.5% 88.5% 75.0% 90.0% 95.8%
Race
 White 78.3% 90.9% 84.6% 41.7% 50.0% 50.0%
 African-American 13.0% 4.5% 3.8% 8.3% 25.0% 8.3%
 Asian-American 0.0% 4.5% 3.8% 20.8% 10.0% 37.5%
 Mixed Race/Other 8.6% 0.0% 7.7% 29.2% 15.0% 4.2%
Education Level 7.04 (2.69) 7.18 (3.08) 6.15 (2.20) 5.88 (1.45) 6.00 (2.27) 7.13 (1.92)
Digit Span 16.91 (5.62) 16.05 (2.92) 14.58 (2.93) 14.67 (3.74) 17.40 (4.42) 15.88 (3.53)
Digit Symbol 44.17 (12.98) 45.91 (7.96) 44.04 (8.60) 62.92 (14.84) 63.10 (12.96) 64.75 (9.56)
Shipley Vocabulary 35.04 (4.08) 35.68 (2.90) 35.28 (4.18) 30.58 (5.51) 31.75 (3.51) 32.17 (4.56)
DOSPERT Investment Subscale 2.58 (1.07) 2.76 (0.95) 2.90 (0.82) 2.47 (1.01) 2.83 (0.77) 3.16 (0.89)
RT
 Target, Baseline Task (ms) 336.39 (65.03) 322.64 (52.63) 340.69 (81.58) 313.92 (94.36) 303.05 (79.88) 299.63 (55.93)
 Target, MID Task (ms) 288.79 (50.87) 286.13 (81.60) 334.21 (89.03) 254.61 (36.11) 231.20 (32.73) 284.80 (51.87)
 Advertisement Credibility (sec) 7.29 (2.41) 7.50 (2.36) 7.53 (1.82) 5.19 (1.71) 4.56 (1.27) 4.88 (1.12)
 Purchase Intention (sec) 5.78 (2.16) 5.88 (1.50) 6.06 (1.42) 6.56 (2.23) 6.25 (2.06) 6.68 (1.76)

Note. HAP=High-arousal positive emotion condition; HAN=High-arousal negative emotion condition; LA=Low arousal condition; DOSPERT=Domain-Specific Risk Attitude Scale; RT=reaction time; ms=milliseconds; sec=seconds.

*

Ethnicity reported as “Hispanic,” “non-Hispanic,” or “Unknown.” Four participants reported ethnicity as “Unknown.”

Numbers do not always add up to 100% due to rounding.

Data were missing for one participant.