Table 1. Characteristics of Older and Younger Adult Responders across Emotional Arousal Conditions.
Variable (M [SD] or %) | Older Adults | Younger Adults | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||
HAP (n=23) | HAN (n=22) | LA (n=26) | HAP (n=24) | HAN (n=20) | LA (n=24) | |
Age | 74.09 (5.94) | 72.59 (4.58) | 74.54 (5.17) | 34.42 (3.18) | 34.15 (3.12) | 34.83 (3.49) |
Gender (% female) | 60.9% | 63.6% | 61.5% | 70.8% | 45.0% | 54.2% |
Ethnicity (% non-Hispanic)* | 95.7% | 95.5% | 88.5% | 75.0% | 90.0% | 95.8% |
Race† | ||||||
White | 78.3% | 90.9% | 84.6% | 41.7% | 50.0% | 50.0% |
African-American | 13.0% | 4.5% | 3.8% | 8.3% | 25.0% | 8.3% |
Asian-American | 0.0% | 4.5% | 3.8% | 20.8% | 10.0% | 37.5% |
Mixed Race/Other | 8.6% | 0.0% | 7.7% | 29.2% | 15.0% | 4.2% |
Education Level | 7.04 (2.69) | 7.18 (3.08) | 6.15 (2.20) | 5.88 (1.45) | 6.00 (2.27) | 7.13 (1.92) |
Digit Span | 16.91 (5.62) | 16.05 (2.92) | 14.58 (2.93) | 14.67 (3.74) | 17.40 (4.42) | 15.88 (3.53) |
Digit Symbol | 44.17 (12.98) | 45.91 (7.96) | 44.04 (8.60) | 62.92 (14.84) | 63.10 (12.96) | 64.75 (9.56) |
Shipley Vocabulary‡ | 35.04 (4.08) | 35.68 (2.90) | 35.28 (4.18) | 30.58 (5.51) | 31.75 (3.51) | 32.17 (4.56) |
DOSPERT Investment Subscale | 2.58 (1.07) | 2.76 (0.95) | 2.90 (0.82) | 2.47 (1.01) | 2.83 (0.77) | 3.16 (0.89) |
RT | ||||||
Target, Baseline Task (ms) | 336.39 (65.03) | 322.64 (52.63) | 340.69 (81.58) | 313.92 (94.36) | 303.05 (79.88) | 299.63 (55.93) |
Target, MID Task (ms) | 288.79 (50.87) | 286.13 (81.60) | 334.21 (89.03) | 254.61 (36.11) | 231.20 (32.73) | 284.80 (51.87) |
Advertisement Credibility (sec) | 7.29 (2.41) | 7.50 (2.36) | 7.53 (1.82) | 5.19 (1.71) | 4.56 (1.27) | 4.88 (1.12) |
Purchase Intention (sec) | 5.78 (2.16) | 5.88 (1.50) | 6.06 (1.42) | 6.56 (2.23) | 6.25 (2.06) | 6.68 (1.76) |
Note. HAP=High-arousal positive emotion condition; HAN=High-arousal negative emotion condition; LA=Low arousal condition; DOSPERT=Domain-Specific Risk Attitude Scale; RT=reaction time; ms=milliseconds; sec=seconds.
Ethnicity reported as “Hispanic,” “non-Hispanic,” or “Unknown.” Four participants reported ethnicity as “Unknown.”
Numbers do not always add up to 100% due to rounding.
Data were missing for one participant.