Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2018 Mar;33(2):325–337. doi: 10.1037/pag0000228

Table 2. Ratings of Purchase Intention across Emotional Arousal Conditions in Older and Younger Adult Responders.

Predictor Unstd. Coeff. SE t p
Main Effects Model
Intercept (γ00) 2.88 0.24 12.24 < .001
HAP vs. LA (γ01) 0.49 0.21 2.34 .021
HAN vs. LA (γ02) 0.50 0.21 2.38 .019
Younger vs. Older Adults (γ03) -0.51 0.19 -2.62 .010
Race (γ04) -0.10 0.22 -0.46 .647
Education Level (γ05) -0.05 0.04 -1.27 .206
Shipley Score (γ06) -0.11 0.02 -4.38 < .001

Interactive Effects Model
Intercept (γ00) 2.82 0.22 12.86 < .001
HAP vs. LA in Older Adults (γ01) 0.55 0.26 2.15 .034
HAN vs. LA in Older Adults (γ02) 0.63 0.27 2.35 .021
Younger vs. Older Adults in LA (γ03) -0.38 0.27 -1.39 .166
HAP vs. LA by Younger vs. Older Adults (γ04) -0.12 0.42 -0.30 .766
HAN vs. LA by Younger vs. Older Adults (γ05) -0.28 0.42 -0.68 .498
Race (γ06) -0.10 0.22 -0.46 .648
Education Level (γ07) -0.06 0.04 -1.38 .169
Shipley Score (γ08) -0.11 0.02 -4.39 < .001

Note. HAP=high-arousal positive emotion condition; HAN=high-arousal negative emotion condition; LA=low arousal condition; SE=standard error. Results reflect two multilevel models: main effects model (upper panel) and interactive effects model (lower panel). Predictors are listed at Level 2.