Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am Heart J. 2018 Apr 6;201:77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.04.006

Table 2.

Adjusted total, pre-, and post-transplant hospitalization costs based on MCS strategy

Total Hospitalization Costs N (%) Adjusted Costs ¥ p-value §

All patients 2873 (100%) $509,870 ($374,529 - $752,899) -
Type of MCS
  None 2268 (78.9%) $457,086 ($347,270 - $644,527) <0.001
  VAD 470 (16.4%) $755,345 ($580,149 - $1,059,854) Ref.
  ECMO 135 (4.7%) $808,771 ($572,341 - $1,157,392) 0.292

Pre-Transplant Costs N (%) Adjusted Costs ¥ p-value

All patients 2873 (100%) $163,718 ($79,772 - $307,702) -
Type of MCS
  None 2268 (78.9%) $124,019 ($65,758 - $222,382) <0.001
  VAD 470 (16.4%) $420,636 ($307,741 - $628,794) Ref.
  ECMO 135 (4.7%) $252,497 ($161,216 - $446,178) <0.001

Post-Transplant Costs N (%) Adjusted Costs ¥ p-value

All patients 2873 (100%) $330,631 ($262,561 - $448,521) -
Type of MCS
  None 2268 (78.9%) $324,887 ($258,402 - $434,268) 0.588
  VAD 470 (16.4%) $329,198 ($264,426 - $442,113) Ref.
  ECMO 135 (4.7%) $540,540 ($391,916 - $723,485) <0.001
§

P-values from the Wilcoxon rank sum test comparing VAD vs. no support and VAD vs. ECMO

¥

Cost model adjusted for the following variables: Patient age, diagnosis, race, blood type, hospital, ECMO (pre- or post-transplant), VAD, ventilator support, inotropic support, length of ICU stay post-transplant, dialysis post-transplant, and transplant year.