Table 3.
Patient Recovery ERGM.
| ERGM Parameter Estimates | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Third Acute | Chronic | |||
| PM | FM | PM | FM | |
| Edges | −7.97*** | −7.27*** | −8.05*** | −8.07*** |
| (0.36) | (0.63) | (0.42) | (0.57) | |
| Nodal Covariate: Degree (Structural) | −0.01 | 0.01 | ||
| (0.01) | (0.01) | |||
| Nodal Covariate: Local Efficiency (Structural) | 0.02 | −0.11 | ||
| (0.12) | (0.16) | |||
| Nodal Covariate: Cluster Coefficient (Structural) | −0.22 | 0.33 | ||
| (0.15) | (0.17) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 1 to 1 (Structural) | 2.33*** | 0.34 | ||
| (0.42) | (0.24) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 2 to 2 (Structural) | 1.17*** | −0.06 | ||
| (0.23) | (0.24) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 1 to 3 (Structural) | −0.48 | −0.34* | ||
| (0.44) | (0.17) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 2 to 3 (Structural) | 0.47* | −0.51** | ||
| (0.23) | (0.17) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 3 to 3 (Structural) | 1.24*** | 0.29 | ||
| (0.24) | (0.15) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 1 to 4 (Structural) | 1.25*** | −0.52** | ||
| (0.26) | (0.20) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 2 to 4 (Structural) | 0.35 | −0.55** | ||
| (0.24) | (0.19) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 3 to 4 (Structural) | 0.35 | −0.55*** | ||
| (0.23) | (0.16) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 4 to 4 (Structural) | 1.11*** | 0.56** | ||
| (0.23) | (0.18) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 1 to 5 (Structural) | −0.35 | −0.20 | ||
| (0.51) | (0.20) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 2 to 5 (Structural) | −0.01 | −0.26 | ||
| (0.26) | (0.20) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 3 to 5 (Structural) | 0.27 | −0.52** | ||
| (0.26) | (0.17) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 4 to 5 (Structural) | 0.16 | −0.39* | ||
| (0.26) | (0.19) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 5 to 5 (Structural) | 2.09*** | 0.42 | ||
| (0.31) | (0.23) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 1 to 6 (Structural) | 1.20*** | −0.42* | ||
| (0.30) | (0.20) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 2 to 6 (Structural) | 0.60* | −0.37* | ||
| (0.24) | (0.18) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 3 to 6 (Structural) | −0.95* | −0.23 | ||
| (0.40) | (0.16) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 4 to 6 (Structural) | 0.39 | −0.22 | ||
| (0.24) | (0.17) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 5 to 6 (Structural) | 0.37 | −0.03 | ||
| (0.29) | (0.18) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 6 to 6 (Structural) | 1.74*** | 0.30 | ||
| (0.29) | (0.19) | |||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 1 to 7 (Structural) | −0.54 | |||
| (0.51) | ||||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 2 to 7 (Structural) | 0.42 | |||
| (0.24) | ||||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 3 to 7 (Structural) | 0.28 | |||
| (0.25) | ||||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 4 to 7 (Structural) | −0.15 | |||
| (0.27) | ||||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 5 to 7 (Structural) | 0.59* | |||
| (0.26) | ||||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 6 to 7 (Structural) | 0.30 | |||
| (0.27) | ||||
| Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 7 to 7 (Structural) | 1.48*** | |||
| (0.26) | ||||
| GWESP (Fixed 0.45) | 3.23*** | 2.87*** | 3.48*** | 3.28*** |
| (0.20) | (0.20) | (0.24) | (0.24) | |
Parameter estimates for the FM and PM of the Acute third session and Chronic session. The mixing term for resting state are excluded because they are in Figure 5. All of the structural parameter estimates are listed in the FM columns. The edges and GWESP parameter estimates are for the functional connectivity in the PMs and FMs. The LATEX code to create this table was produced by the R package called texreg (132).
*
p < 0.05;
**
p < 0.01;
***
p < 0.001.