Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 12;9:439. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00439

Table 4.

Patient Recovery STERGM.

STERGM Parameter Estimates
Formation Dissolution
Edges −10.03*** −3.56*
(1.04) (1.79)
Nodal Covariate: Degree (Structural) 0.01 0.03
(0.01) (0.02)
Nodal Covariate: Local Efficiency (Structural) −0.14 −1.27
(0.64) (1.64)
Nodal Covariate: Cluster Coefficient (Structural) 0.34 1.33
(0.49) (1.25)
Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 1 to 1 (Structural) −0.04 −0.01
(0.09) (0.21)
Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 2 to 2 (Structural) 0.04 0.30
(0.17) (0.41)
Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 1 to 3 (Structural) −0.12 −0.11
(0.09) (0.24)
Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 2 to 3 (Structural) −0.04 0.19
(0.11) (0.32)
Nodal Covariate Mixing: Latent Cluster 3 to 3 (Structural) −0.00 −0.13
(0.14) (0.32)
GWESP (Fixed 0.75) 3.26***
(0.33)
GWESP (Fixed 0.25) 0.27***
(0.08)

Parameter estimates for the formation and dissolution models. The mixing term for resting state are excluded because they are in Figure 7. All of the structural parameter estimates are listed in the FM columns. The edges and GWESP parameter estimates are for the functional connectivity in the formation and dissolution models. The LATEX code to create this table was produced by the R package called texreg (132).

*

p < 0.05;

**p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001.