Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 12;9:769. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00769

Table 3.

Summary of QTLs detected for 11 physiological and biochemical traits in the MCam population under drought stress.

Trait Drought stress conditions
QTL name Chr. Nearest marker LOD Confidence interval [cM] Additive effect R2 [%]
PLANT WATER STATUS
WL QdWL.2H 2H 5880-2547 6.84 14.03–14.23 −0.202 21.9
QdWL.5H_3 5H 3412-579 4.15 57.16–9.59 0.136 12.9
QdWL.7H_2 7H ConsensusGBS0356-1 3.15 23.72–25.99 −0.121 10.6
WC QdWC.2H 2H 5880-2547 3.82 14.03–14.23 −0.323 17.2
PHOTOSYNTHETIC EFFICIENCY
ABS/RC QdABS/RC.2H.1 2H 9490-843 3.97 5.42–8.31 −0.085 17.3
QdABS/RC.2H.2 2H 285-2932 4.09 119.60–120.57 −0.166 17.7
TR0/RC QdTRo/RC.2H.1 2H AK356764.1 3.55 10.92–14.03 −0.051 13.4
QdTRo/RC.2H.2 2H 2809-271 4.69 66.78–67.71 −0.047 16.9
ET0/RC QdETo/RC.2H 2H AK353596.1 3.85 132.17–145.34 0.041 20.5
DI0/CS QdDlo/CS.5H_3 5H 5156-737 3.89 51.79–52.38 44.152 17.5
(1-B)av Qd(1-B)av.7H_2 7H 497-386 3.33 37.97–40.35 −0.354 18.7
OSMOPROTECTANT AND HORMONE CONTENT
Pro QdPro.2H.1 2H Bmag0692 6.36 19.28–28.33 3.114 12.2
QdPro.2H.2 2H 6328-736 10.62 118.44–118.63 −7.080 75.2
QdPro.3H_2.1 3H EBmac0708 10.53 15.02–19.08 −11.964 73.6
QdPro.3H_2.2 3H 265-1229 11.58 33.01–35.29 20.832 77.5
Mal QdMal.3H_2.1 3H EBmac0708 18.38 17.02–18.08 1.370 85.8
QdMal.3H_2.2 3H GBM1420 18.44 36.75–42.52 −1.533 85.9
Eth QdEth.2H 2H Bmag0692 3.66 18.28–26.33 0.084 18.5
ACTIVITY AND ACCUMULATION OF ANTIOXIDANTS
ATf QdATf.6H 6H ConsensusGBS0136-7 4.36 0–2.75 −0.019 20.0

Functional candidate genes that co-segregated with the maximum LOD scores within confidence intervals of mapped QTLs are underlined; LOD ≥ 10 and R2 ≥ 30 are in bold. R2, percentage of phenotypic variation explained by individual QTL.