Table 5. Pearson Correlation Coefficients (R) between Radiation Dose Parameters and Image Quality Parameters.
Slice Thickness-Normalized Image Noise | SNR | CNR | Subjective Image Quality Grade | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CTDIvol before CT scan | ||||
Group 1 | 0.52 (p = 0.0004) | 0.22 (p = 0.2) | 0.17 (p = 0.3) | 0.32 (p = 0.04) |
Group 2 | 0.37 (p = 0.02) | 0.01 (p = 0.9) | 0.06 (p = 0.7) | 0.19 (p = 0.2) |
CTDIvol after CT scan | ||||
Group 1 | 0.49 (p = 0.001) | 0.21 (p = 0.2) | 0.16 (p = 0.3) | 0.30 (p = 0.051) |
Group 2 | 0.20 (p = 0.2) | 0.22 (p = 0.2) | 0.26 (p = 0.1) | 0.06 (p = 0.7) |
Effective mAs | ||||
Group 1 | 0.49 (p < 0.0001) | 0.21 (p = 0.2) | 0.16 (p = 0.3) | 0.30 (p = 0.054) |
Group 2 | 0.20 (p = 0.2) | 0.23 (p = 0.2) | 0.26 (p = 0.1) | 0.06 (p = 0.7) |
Quality reference mAs | ||||
Group 1 | 0.04 (p = 0.8) | 0.04 (p = 0.8) | 0.01 (p = 0.9) | 0.09 (p = 0.6) |
Group 2 | 0.05 (p = 0.8) | 0.24 (p = 0.1) | 0.23 (p = 0.1) | 0.24 (p = 0.1) |