Skip to main content
. 2018 May;10(5):2948–2959. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.55

Table 2. Gene mutation frequency according to the efficacy group of patients taking crizotinib.

Gene analyzed Good, n (%) (n=13) Intermediate, n (%) (n=17) Poor, n (%) (n=6) P value*
TP53 0.625
   Mutant 5 (38.5) 5 (29.4) 1 (16.7)
   Wild type 8 (61.5) 12 (70.6) 5 (83.3)
FAT3 0.450
   Mutant 3 (23.1) 3 (17.6) 0 (0)
   Wild type 10 (76.9) 14 (82.4) 6 (100.0)
SMARCA4 0.607
   Mutant 2 (15.4) 2 (11.8) 0 (0)
   Wild type 11 (84.6) 15 (88.2) 6 (100.0)
BRCA2 0.665
   Mutant 1 (7.7) 2 (11.8) 0 (0)
   Wild type 12 (92.3) 15 (88.2) 6 (100.0)
RUNX1 0.304
   Mutant 1 (7.7) 2 (11.8) 2 (33.3)
   Wild type 12 (92.3) 15 (88.2) 4 (66.7)
SETD2 0.161
   Mutant 0 (0) 3 (17.6) 0 (0)
   Wild type 13 (100.0) 14 (82.4) 6 (100.0)
SPEN 0.720
   Mutant 1 (7.7) 3 (17.6) 1 (16.7)
   Wild type 12 (92.3) 14 (82.4) 5 (83.3)
EGFR 19del 0.791
   Mutant 1 (7.7) 1 (5.9) 0 (0)
   Wild type 12 (92.3) 16 (94.1) 6 (100.0)
EGFR L858R 0.076
   Mutant 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (16.7)
   Wild type 13 (100.0) 17 (100.0) 5 (83.3)
BRAF V600E 0.076
   Mutant 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (16.7)
   Wild type 13 (100.0) 17 (100.0) 5 (83.3)

*, chi-square test.