Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 18;8:9311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27633-5

Table 1.

Expression stability values for Neolamarckia cadamba candidate reference genes calculated by BestKeeper.

Ranking Tissue Developmental stage photosynthetic cycle Drought treatment Cold treatment Total
1 ACT7 (1.37 ± 0.36) PGK (1.83 ± 0.51) SAMDC (0.35 ± 0.09) RPL10A (0.61 ± 0.19) RPS25 (0.67 ± 0.17) SAMDC (1.43 ± 0.35)
2 RPL10A (1.43 ± 0.45) RPL10A (1.91 ± 0.58) ACT7 (0.64 ± 0.14) SAMDC (1.04 ± 0.25) SAMDC (1.35 ± 0.33) F-BOX (2.71 ± 0.79)
3 SAMDC (1.53 ± 0.37) SAMDC (2.1 ± 0.51) PGK (1.32 ± 0.37) RPS25 (1.38 ± 0.33) TUA5 (1.81 ± 0.51) RPS25 (2.78 ± 0.68)
4 EF-1-α (1.96 ± 0.58) F-BOX (2.67 ± 0.78) RPS25 (1.57 ± 0.39) ACT1 (1.41 ± 0.38) Rubisco (1.87 ± 0.41) PGK (2.85 ± 0.78)
5 PGK (2 ± 0.56) ACT7 (2.79 ± 0.68) ACT1 (1.6 ± 0.41) ACT11 (1.75 ± 0.46) RPL10A (2.6 ± A0.79) RPL10A (3.33 ± 1.01)
6 F-BOX (2.11 ± 0.62) TUA5 (2.94 ± 0.75) TUA5 (1.6 ± 0.41) F-BOX (1.79 ± 0.52) ACT11 (2.64 ± 0.64) TUA5 (3.58 ± 0.96)
7 TUA5 (2.17 ± 0.6) TUA2 (3.09 ± 0.76) RPL10A (1.94 ± 0.55) TUA5 (1.97 ± 0.53) F-BOX (2.94 ± 0.87) ACT11 (3.86 ± 0.98)
8 ACT11 (2.26 ± 0.57) RPS25 (3.09 ± 0.76) TUA2 (2.13 ± 0.49) TUA4 (2.37 ± 0.59) TUA4 (3.1 ± 0.77) ACT1 (4 ± 1.06)
9 RPS25 (2.46 ± 0.6) MDH (3.45 ± 0.83) EF-1-α (2.54 ± 0.61) PGK (2.52 ± 0.67) ACT1 (3.26 ± 0.88) TUA4 (4.41 ± 1.07)
10 ACT1 (2.54 ± 0.66) TUA4 (3.52 ± 0.86) ACT11 (3.11 ± 0.79) MDH (3.76 ± 0.91) PGK (3.61 ± 0.99) MDH (4.94 ± 1.2)
11 TUA4 (3.22 ± 0.77) EF-1-α (3.97 ± 1.11) GAPDH (3.17 ± 0.8) TUA2 (4.97 ± 1.36) ACT7 (3.76 ± 0.95) Rubisco (5.04 ± 1.1)
12 TUA2 (4.48 ± 1.09) ACT11 (4.46 ± 1.17) MDH (4.11 ± 1.02) EF-1-α (5.12 ± 1.37) EF-1-α (3.84 ± 1.06) ACT7 (5.26 ± 1.32)
13 GAPDH (4.69 ± 1.09) ACT1 (4.74 ± 1.3) F-BOX (4.28 ± 1.21) ACT7 (5.33 ± 1.36) GAPDH (4.44 ± 1.02) GAPDH (5.77 ± 1.35)
14 Rubisco (5.2 ± 1.16) Rubisco (5.18 ± 1.13) TUA4 (5.89 ± 1.31) Rubisco (6.16 ± 1.32) TUA2 (5.07 ± 1.32) TUA2 (6.21 ± 1.57)
15 MDH (5.28 ± 1.24) GAPDH (5.31 ± 1.21) Rubisco (7.17 ± 1.56) GAPDH (6.23 ± 1.48) MDH (6.25 ± 1.56) EF-1-α (6.44 ± 1.77)

Note: Fifteen candidate reference genes are evaluated by the lowest values of the coefficient of variance (CV) and standard deviation (SD). The number in the bracket indicated that CV ± SD.