Table 2.
Relationship between the different categories under study and the game situations
| Game situations | Categories | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||
| M U’12 | M U’14 | F U’12 | F U’14 | ||
| 1-on-0 | % of Categories | 27.1% | 14.9% | 38.1% | 30.1% |
| ASR | -.4 | -6.4 | 5.4* | 1.2 | |
| 1-on-1 | % of Categories | 30.2% | 42.8% | 34.1% | 24.5% |
| ASR | -1.2 | 4.9* | .8 | -4.2 | |
|
| |||||
| 2-on-0 | % of Categories | 8.6% | .0% | 2.4% | 9.6% |
| ASR | 3.6* | -5.4 | -3.1 | 4.6* | |
| 2-on-1 | % of Categories | 4.9% | 5.2% | 5.8% | 2.4% |
| ASR | .4 | .7 | 1.4 | -2.5 | |
| 2-on-2 | % of Categories | 6.7% | 4.6% | 9.8% | 10.7% |
| ASR | -1.3 | -2.8 | 1.6 | 2.4* | |
|
| |||||
| 3-on-0 | % of Categories | .7% | 1.5% | 1.0% | 2.4% |
| ASR | -1.6 | .3 | -.9 | 2.2* | |
| 3-on-2 | % of Categories | 2.4% | 2.8% | 1.0% | 4.0% |
| ASR | -.2 | .4 | -2.4 | 2.2* | |
| 3-on-3 | % of Categories | 9.8% | 9.0% | 4.1% | 6.5% |
| ASR | 2.3* | 1.5 | -2.9 | -.8 | |
|
| |||||
| 4-on-4 | % of Categories | 2.4% | 3.4% | 1.0% | .9% |
| ASR | 1.0 | 2.4* | -1.6 | -1.8 | |
|
| |||||
| 5-on-4 | % of Categories | .0% | .5% | .0% | .0% |
| ASR | -.8 | 2.6* | -.8 | -.8 | |
| 5-on-5 | % of Categories | 3.3% | 14.7% | .0% | .7% |
| ASR | -1.3 | 11.2* | -5.0 | -4.5 | |
|
| |||||
| χ2 | 371.13 | ||||
|
| |||||
| φc | .269 | ||||
*
>|1.96|; in bold: p < 0.001