Skip to main content
. 2018 May 16;8(2):199–206. doi: 10.1159/000488705

Table 2.

Bivariate analysis to demonstrate the differences between the groups according to SMD quantification by the Fazekas, Scheltens (hippocampal atrophy), and Koedam (parietal atrophy) scales on MRI

Classification NC, n (%) (n = 34) MCI, n (%) (n = 41) AD, n (%) (n = 30) p
Fazekas scaleA, B, C 0 16 (47.1) 6 (14.6) 2 (6.7) <0.001
1 15 (44.1) 28 (68.3) 6 (20)
2 3 (8.8) 7 (17.3) 22 (73)
3 0 0 0

Scheltens scaleA, B, C 0 21 (61.8) 18 (43.9 0 <0.001
1 11 (3.4) 15 (36.6) 5 (16.7)
2 2 (5.9) 7 (17.1) 13 (43.4)
3 0 1 (2.4) 10 (33.3)
4 0 0 2 (6.0)

Koedam scaleA, B, C 0 17 (50) 13 (31.7) 0 <0.001
1 16 (47.1) 22 (53.7) 22 (73.3)
2 1 (2.9) 6 (14.6) 7 (23.3)
3 0 0 1 (3.3)

Lobar microbleedsA, B Presence 0 1 (2.4) 6 (20) 0.002
Absence 34 (100) 40 (97.6) 24 (80)

SMD, small-vessel disease; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NC, normal cognition; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; AD, Alzheimer disease.

A

Post-hoc Bonferroni analysis: AD versus NC, p < 0.05

B

Post-hoc Bonferroni analysis: AD versus MCI, p < 0.05

C

Post-hoc Bonferroni analysis: MCI versus NC, p < 0.05.