Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 8;18:644. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4566-4

Table 4.

Subgroups analysis of ORR achievement

Parameters ORR (n = 75) Not ORR (n = 24) P value
Age (years) 58.27 ± 10.09 57.04 ± 11.05
Gender Male (n/%) 68 (76.4) 21 (23.6) 0.654
HBV (n/%) 71 (75.5) 23 (24.5) 0.820
HCV (n/%) 1 (50.0) 1 (50.0) 0.390
Drink (n/%) 33 (76.7) 10 (23.3) 0.841
Cirrhosis (n/%) 41 (74.5) 14 (25.5) 0.753
Tumor distributiona 0.765
  > =20% (n/%) 38 (74.5) 13 (25.5)
  < 20 (n/%) 37 (77.1) 11 (22.9)
Number of nodules
 1 (n/%) 26 (86.7) 4 (13.3) 0.095
  > 1 (n/%) 49 (71.0) 20 (29.0)
  < =3 (n/%) 45 (83.3) 9 (16.7) 0.054
  > 3 (n/%) 30 (66.7) 15 (33.3)
Largest nodule size > 3 cm (n/%) 54 (78.3) 15 (21.7) 0.278
Largest nodule size > 5 cm (n/%) 33 (75.0) 11 (25.0) 0.875
Portal vein invasion (n/%) 19 (65.5) 10 (34.5) 0.126
 Main portal vein invasion (n/%) 3 (37.5) 5 (62.5) 0.173
 First branch invasion (n/%) 4 (50.0) 4 (50.0)
 Second branch invasion (n/%) 10 (76.9) 3 (23.1)
Hepatic vein invasion (n/%) 12 (70.6) 5 (29.4) 0.585
ECOG performance status 0.595
 0 (n/%) 52 (74.3) 18 (25.7)
 1 (n/%) 23 (79.3) 6 (20.7)
Child-pugh stage 0.419
 A (n/%) 68 (74.7) 23 (25.3)
 B (n/%) 7 (87.5) 1 (12.5)
BCLC stage 0.029
 A (n/%) 19 (79.2) 5 (20.8)
 B (n/%) 31 (88.6) 4 (11.4)
 C (n/%) 25 (62.5) 15 (37.5)
AFP 0.432
 Abnormal (n/%) 40 (72.7) 15 (27.3)
 Normal (n/%) 35 (79.5) 9 (20.5)
Previous cTACE 0.089
 Yes (n/%) 26 (66.7) 13 (33.3)
 No (n/%) 49 (81.7) 11 (18.3)
Previous surgery 0.136
 Yes (n/%) 53 (80.3) 13 (19.7)
 No (n/%) 22 (66.7) 11 (33.3)
Previous systematic chemotherapy 0.820
 Yes (n/%) 4 (80.0) 1 (20.0)
 No (n/%) 71 (75.5) 23 (24.5)
Previous radiofrequency ablation 0.585
 Yes (n/%) 12 (70.6) 5 (29.4)
 No (n/%) 63 (76.8) 19 (23.2)
Previous targeted therapy (n/%) 0.562
 Yes (n/%) 1 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
 No (n/%) 74 (75.5) 24 (24.5)
Chemoembolization reagent 0.248
 Adriamycin (n/%) 4 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
 Epirubicin (n/%) 71 (74.7) 24 (25.3)

Data was presented as count (%) or mean ± standard deviation

Comparison between groups was determined by t test or Chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. aTumor distribution: percentage of tumor in the whole liver

HBV Hepatic b virus, HCV Hepatic c virus, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, BCLC Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer, AFP Alpha fetal protein, cTACE Conventional transarterial chemo-embolization