TABLE 5.
Indications of confusion from within individual interviews
| Theme | Proportion of interviews containing themea | Average occurrences per interviewb |
|---|---|---|
| Incorrect interpretation | 100.0% | 14.6 |
| Explicit confusion | 92.9% | 3.6 |
| Implicit confusion | 78.6% | 3.5 |
aCalculated from the total number of interviews conducted (n = 14).
bDetermined by taking the total occurrences of a given code divided by the number of interviews containing the code.