Skip to main content
. 2018 Spring;17(1):ar6. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-04-0069

TABLE 5.

Indications of confusion from within individual ­interviews

Theme Proportion of interviews containing themea Average ­occurrences per interviewb
Incorrect interpretation 100.0% 14.6
Explicit confusion 92.9% 3.6
Implicit confusion 78.6% 3.5

aCalculated from the total number of interviews conducted (n = 14).

bDetermined by taking the total occurrences of a given code divided by the ­number of interviews containing the code.