Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 19;13(6):e0199534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199534

Table 1. NiV assay comparison.

Virus Virus Stock Assay Ct Values Mean Viral RNA copies/mL Coefficient of Variation
NiV-M
Daughter A NiV-M Assay 22.8, 24.1, 22.6 7.87 x 1010 0.35
NiV-M-F Assay 14.8, 15.2, 15.0 3.87 x 1012 0.15
NiV-M-G Assay 15.1, 15.0, 15.2 3.72 x 1012 0.26
Daughter B NiV-M Assay 23.0, 23.0, 22.5 8.99 x 1010 0.10
NiV-M-F Assay 15.3, 15.2, 15.3 3.43 x 1012 0.04
NiV-M-G Assay 16.0, 15.7, 15.9 2.57 x 1012 0.03
Daughter C NiV-M Assay 20.8, 21.9, 20.81 2.03 x1011 0.05
NiV-M-F Assay 12.9, 12.7, 12.8 1.13 x 1013 0.09
NiV-M-G Assay 13.5, 13.5, 13.3 8.32 x 1012 0.04
NiV-B Daughter A NiV-B Assay 21.5, 21.4, 21.5 3.06 x 1010 0.03
NiV-B-F Assay 15.4, 15.5, 15.5 1.01 x 1012 0.05
NiV-B-G Assay 15.5, 15.6, 15.5 9.67 x 1011 0.05
Daughter B NiV-B Assay 21.9, 21.8, 21.9 2.42 x 1010 0.04
NiV-B-F Assay 15.8, 15.9, 15.9 8.02 x 1011 0.05
NiV-B-G Assay 16.0, 15.9, 15.9 7.85 x 1011 0.03
Daughter C NiV-B Assay 22.6, 22.7, 22.5 1.59 x 1010 0.07
NiV-B-F Assay 16.5, 16.6, 16.5 5.44 x 1011 0.03
NiV-B-G Assay 16.5, 16.6, 16.6 5.45 x 1011 0.03

NiV-M and NiV-B was passaged 3 consecutive times and a qRT-PCR was performed on each sample in triplicate using the assay that targets the F/G intergenic region, the F coding region or the G coding region. The coefficient of variation of the mean viral RNA copies/mL was calculated for each daughter sample analyzed.