Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 17;314(5):R693–R699. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00380.2017

Table 1.

Comparison of time-tension indexes

Groups/Contractions TTI, g/s SE, g/s
Protocol 1 (P = 0.245, n = 5)
    Control 25,598 2,949
    Saline 32,092 3,280
    DAMGO, 2 μg 29,735 1,187
Protocol 2 (P = 0.489, n = 6)
    Control 22,009 4,450
    Saline 26,005 3,347
    TLQ, 1 μg 23,980 3,798
    TLQ + DAMGO 25,445 4,825
Protocol 3 (P = 0.893, n = 7)
    Control 19,444 2,781
    Saline 19,494 1,919
    TLQ, 10 μg 21,528 2,726
    TLQ + DAMGO 20,667 2,342
Protocol 4 (P = 0.114, n = 7)
    Control 33,128 5,239
    Saline 30,824 3,725
    GVIA,* 1 μg 25,628 3,193
Protocol 5 (P = 0.07, n = 4)
    Control 22,924 1,951
    Saline 32,283 2,750
    30 min 24,933 3,019
    60 min 32,878 3,047
    90 min 31,173 3,853
    120 min 29,275 2,593

Comparison of tension-time indexes within protocols. A one-way repeated-measures ANOVA revealed no differences between treatments. DAMGO, [d-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly-ol]-enkephalin; GVIA, ω-conotoxin-GVIA; TLQ, tertiapin-LQ; TTI, tension-time index.

*

Measurement recorded at time of maximal inhibition and combined for analysis.