Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2017 Dec 19;89(6):e459–e467. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12981

Table 3.

Intervention effects at follow-up

Willingness to Use Alcohol (follow-up)

Predictor B (SE) β Sig
Level 1
 Willingness (baseline) .47 (.05) .38 p < .001
 Special Ed −.04 (.06) −.02 ns
 Ethnicity −.08 (.04) −.05 p < .05
 Sex .03 (.03) .02 ns
Level 2
 Intervention condition −.10 (.05) −.69 p = .05

Deviant Peer Affiliation (follow-up)

Predictor B (SE) β Sig

Level 1
 Deviant peer affiliation (baseline) .38 (.05) .37 p < .001
 Special Ed −.03 (.06) −.02 ns
 Ethnicity −.06 (.04) −.04 ns
 Sex .00 (.05) .00 ns
Level 2
 Intervention condition −.12 (.05) −.68 p < .01

Alcohol Use (follow-up)

Predictor B (SE) β Sig

Level 1
 Alcohol use (baseline) .57 (.07) .43 p < .001
 Special Ed −.02 (.03) −.02 ns
 Ethnicity −.02 (.03) −.01 ns
 Sex .01 (.02) .01 ns
Level 2
 Intervention condition −.09 (.04) −.61 p < .05