Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pain. 2018 Jul;159(7):1346–1358. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001215

Table 6.

Results for the prediction of initial status and change in 7-day recall pain ratings from regime switching measures

Recall of usual pain Recall of pain unpleasantness


b (SE) β b (SE) β
Regression parameters
Month-1 pain recall
  Step 1 (R2) (.464) (.370)
   Average pain level .92 (.06) .70*** 1.01 (.09) .64***
  Step 2R2) (.147) (.193)
   Amplitude of shifts .34 (.09) .27*** .54 (.08) .36***
   Persistence of states −.16 (.17) −.07 −.08 (.23) −.03
   Dominance of higher state .37 (.07) .25*** .40 (.09) .23***
Change in pain recall
   Step 1 (R2) (.470) (.368)
    Change in average pain level 1.12 (.08) .71*** 1.31 (.15) .63***
   Step 2R2) (.054) (.101)
   Change in amplitude .21 (.09) .13* .56 (.16) .27***
   Change in persistence −.05 (.08) −.04 −.09 (.14) −.05
   Change in dominance .26 (.09) .24** .32 (.12) .22**
Intercepts
 Month-1 status 5.26 (.13) 5.89 (.16)
 Rate of change −.74 (.14) −1.07 (.19)
Residual variances
 Month-1 status 1.84 (.27) 2.80 (.40)
 Rate of change 1.90 (.37) 3.78 (.71)

Note: All predictor variables were grand mean centered.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001.