Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun;68(3):196–203. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-CM-17-000113

Table 2.

Mass (g) of adipose tissue

White adipose tissue
Intraabdominal–gonadal Retroperitoneal Omental Brown adipose tissue Adiposity index
Regimen 1
Summer
 VAC1 (n = 8) 2.1 ± 0.3b 1.3 ± 0.2c 0.8 ± 0.1b 0.5 ± 0.1c 1.7 ± 0.2b
 VAD1 (n = 8) 0.8 ± 0.1c 0.4 ± 0.0d 0.5 ± 0.5b 0.2 ± 0.0c 1.0 ± 0.1b
Hibernation
 VAC1 (n = 5) 10.3 ± 0.7a 7.0 ± 0.7a 2.0 ± 0.4a 1.9 ± 0.2a 6.1 ± 0.7a
 VAD1 (n = 7) 7.1 ± 0.9a 4.2 ± 0.4b 2.0 ± 0.2a 1.3 ± 0.1b 4.9 ± 0.4a
Regimen 2
Summer
 VAC2 (n = 8) 9.0 ± 0.8 4.7 ± 0.3 2.6 ± 0.2 1.5 ± 0.1b 4.7 ± 0.4
 VAD2 (n = 8) 9.2 ± 1.0 4.9 ± 0.3 2.3 ± 0.1 1.6 ± 0.2b 4.9 ± 0.5
Hibernation
 VAC2 (n = 7) 12.0 ± 0.9 5.6 ± 0.3 3.8 ± 0.3* 2.1 ± 0.2a 6.2 ± 0.3
 VAD2 (n = 8) 9.9 ± 0.7 5.0 ± 0.4 2.2 ± 0.3 2.1 ± 0.1a 5.4 ± 0.4
Spring
 VAC2 (n = 7) 9.3 ± 1.0 5.4 ± 0.4 2.7 ± 0.2 2.0 ± 0.2a 5.6 ± 0.6
 VAD2 (n = 7) 8.5 ± 0.6 4.5 ± 0.3 2.3 ± 0.2 1.8 ± 0.1a 5.3 ± 0.3

Data are presented as mean ± SE. Within each site and regimen, groups with different superscripted letters differ significantly (p < 0.05; Tukey posthoc test with general linear model ANOVA).

*

This value was significantly (P < 0.05) different from all other omental WAT measures for regimen 2.