Table 1. Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters for the B–E exchange process obtained from an analysis of temperature dependent CPMG RD NMR experiments, a 19 state MSM and direct MD simulations a .
Temp (°C) | k ex (s–1) | p E (%) | Source |
1.0 | 649 ± 50 | 4.7 ± 0.2 | CPMG RD NMR |
5.3 | 1099 ± 57 | 4.7 ± 0.2 | CPMG RD NMR |
10.4 | 2240 ± 122 | 3.8 ± 0.5 | CPMG RD NMR |
15.4 | 3871 ± 79 | 3.5 ± 0.2 | CPMG RD NMR |
20.4 | 6100 ± 350 | 3.6 ± 0.6 | CPMG RD NMR |
37 | 3.9 ± 0.3 × 104 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | Arrhenius extrapolation of CPMG RD NMR derived rates |
37 | 3.3 ± 0.4 × 105 | 1.4 ± 1 | 19 state MSM (2 state analysis) |
50 | 1.3 ± 0.3 × 105 | 1.9 ± 0.3 | Arrhenius extrapolation of CPMG RD NMR derived rates |
50 | 6.6 ± 0.3 × 105 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 19 state MSM (2 state analysis) |
Transition path time (ns) | |||
Average value | Range | Source | |
37 | 60.5 | 2.4 to 231.2 | MD simulations |
50 | 39.6 | 1.3 to 141.6 | MD simulations |
aTo estimate two state exchange parameters from the 19 state MSM 1/kex was taken to be the slowest implied timescale as it corresponds to the E–B interconversion (Fig. 3) and states E and B were defined in terms of the populations of states 0 (E) and 15–18 (B), respectively. The fractional population of state E, pE, was then calculated as the population of state 0/(sum of populations of states 0 and 15–18). The value of pB = 1 – pE.