Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 7;7(6):3602–3613. doi: 10.1039/c5sc03886c

Table 1. Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters for the B–E exchange process obtained from an analysis of temperature dependent CPMG RD NMR experiments, a 19 state MSM and direct MD simulations a .

Temp (°C) k ex (s–1) p E (%) Source
1.0 649 ± 50 4.7 ± 0.2 CPMG RD NMR
5.3 1099 ± 57 4.7 ± 0.2 CPMG RD NMR
10.4 2240 ± 122 3.8 ± 0.5 CPMG RD NMR
15.4 3871 ± 79 3.5 ± 0.2 CPMG RD NMR
20.4 6100 ± 350 3.6 ± 0.6 CPMG RD NMR
37 3.9 ± 0.3 × 104 2.3 ± 0.3 Arrhenius extrapolation of CPMG RD NMR derived rates
37 3.3 ± 0.4 × 105 1.4 ± 1 19 state MSM (2 state analysis)
50 1.3 ± 0.3 × 105 1.9 ± 0.3 Arrhenius extrapolation of CPMG RD NMR derived rates
50 6.6 ± 0.3 × 105 0.6 ± 0.3 19 state MSM (2 state analysis)
Transition path time (ns)
Average value Range Source
37 60.5 2.4 to 231.2 MD simulations
50 39.6 1.3 to 141.6 MD simulations

aTo estimate two state exchange parameters from the 19 state MSM 1/kex was taken to be the slowest implied timescale as it corresponds to the E–B interconversion (Fig. 3) and states E and B were defined in terms of the populations of states 0 (E) and 15–18 (B), respectively. The fractional population of state E, pE, was then calculated as the population of state 0/(sum of populations of states 0 and 15–18). The value of pB = 1 – pE.