Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 19;18:69. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0539-z

Table 1.

Lin’s Concordance & Pearson Correlation Coefficients between the two methods: IAP & IBP for all measures (IAP = 0–22 mmHg) Versus High IAP (IAP > 12 mmHg)

Variable Y Intra Abdominal Pressure (IAP = 0–22 mmHg) Intra Abdominal Pressure (IAP > 12 mmHg)
Variable X Intra Bladder Pressure (IBP with IAP = 0–22 mmHg) Intra Bladder Pressure (IBP with IAP > 12 mmHg)
Sample size 388 81
Mean IAP: 8.254
IBP: 8.351
IAP: 16.173
IBP: 16.455
Variance IAP: 27.037
IBP: 29.318
IAP: 09.150
IBP: 15.764
Concordance correlation coefficient 0.965 0.903
95% Confidence interval 0.958 to 0.971 0.866 to 0.931
Pearson ρ (precision) 0.966 0.940
Significance level P < 0.0001 P < 0.0001
Bias correction factor Cb (accuracy) 0.999 0.961