Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 28;4(3):238–249. doi: 10.1002/osp4.161

Table 1.

Summary of published associations between the Power of Food Scale scores and body mass index

Sample characteristics
First author and year published Study type Participants included Age BMI N (% female) Strength of PFS and BMI relationship
Appelhans (2011) Observational study of food sensitivity, inhibitory control and food intake in medically healthy obese samples Healthy overweight or obese women in USA 31.0 ± 7.7 31.5 ± 3.4 kg m−2 62 (100%) r = −0.17
Cappelleri (2009) Psychometric analysis of the PFS in (1) clinical and (2) web‐based samples 1. Obese non‐diabetic in clinical trial for weight management in USA 46.3 ± 11.0 38.6 ± 6.7 kg m−2 1741 (82%) r = 0.02–0.24 for total/subscales scores and BMI
2. Non‐obese healthy and overweight/obese (non‐diabetic and diabetic groups) in USA 52.5 ± 12.8 33.1 ± 7.6 kg m−2 1275 (39%) b = 1.47
Burger (2016) Investigation of neural correlates associated with anticipation for and receipt of palatable food 1. Recruited from college campus in USA 20.8 ± 1.3 years 23.8 ± 2.9 kg m−2 44 (100%) r = −0.22
2. College freshmen in USA 18.4 ± 0.6 23.8 ± 4.3 kg m−2 398 (100%) r = 0.05
3. Community‐based sample in USA 32.7 ± 11.3 25.9 ± 7.3 kg m−2 100 (58%) r = 0.13
Carpenter (2013) Cross‐sectional investigation of BMI and genetic polymorphisms in clinical weight‐loss treatment patients Obese females and males in USA 53.3 ± 15.5 33.1 ± 12.5 kg m−2 80 (74%) r 2 = 0.12*
Finlayson (2012) Observational study of weight change in university students First‐year female and male university students in UK and Scotland 19.2 ± 2.6 21.9 ± 3.2 kg m−2 250 (65%) r = 0.05
Lipsky (2016) Cross‐sectional investigation of relationship between PFS and weight/dieting outcomes among US young adults Female and male members of nationally representative study cohort in USA (NEXT Gen Health Study) 20.3 ± 0.02 25.7 ± 0.30 kg m−2 2201 (59.2%) β = 0.32
Lowe (2009) Initial validation of PFS Female and male university students in UK and USA 20.1a 22.4 kg m−2 a 466 (86%) r = 0.03*
Rejeski (2012) Investigation of the neural correlates associated with PFS in fasted and fed states Obese sedentary older adults (50–80 years of age) in USA 64.65 ± 6.84 33.97 ± 2.67 kg m−2 22 (55%) r = 0.29
Vainik (2015) Analysis of relationship between eating‐related questionnaires 1. Females from Estonia 30.5 ± 9.8 22.5 ± 4.7 kg m−2 740 (100%) r = 0.19***
2. First‐year university students in Canada 21.1 ± 4.5 22.1 ± 3.8 kg m−2 456 (100%) r = 0.05
Thomas (2013) Investigation of behavioural qualities in obese‐prone and obese‐resistant individuals Healthy obese‐prone adults in the USA 26.1 ± 2.8 30.4 ± 3.9 kg m−2 29 (52%) Reported as not significant; no statistic provided
Healthy obese‐resistant adults in the USA 30.7 ± 3.4 20.9 ± 1.9 kg m−2 29 (48%)
a

No standard deviation provided.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.