Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 20.
Published in final edited form as: Parasitology. 2017 Jul 18;145(5):595–607. doi: 10.1017/S0031182017001147

Table 1.

PCR used or of potential use to generate Leptospira “barcodes”. The PCR published for diagnostic purpose are usually optimized for sensitivity and specificity.

Initial purpose Gene target Technology Product size Reference
Diagnostic 16S rRNA rrs Conventional nested PCR 331 bp
290 bp
(Merien et al., 1992)
Primers A & D detect all Leptospira species
Diagnostic lipL32 SYBR Green I qPCR 423 bp (Levett et al., 2005)
Diagnostic lipL32 TaqMan qPCR 242 bp (Stoddard et al., 2009)
Diagnostic secY SYBR Green I qPCR 202 bp (Ahmed et al., 2009)
Diagnostic lfb1 SYBR Green I qPCR 331 bp (Merien et al., 2005)
Diagnostic flaB Conventional PCR 793 bp (Kawabata et al., 2001)
Diagnostic secY Conventional PCR 285 bp (Gravekamp et al., 1993)
Typing gyrB Conventional PCR or SYBR Green I qPCR 504 bp (Slack et al., 2006)
Typing rpoB Conventional PCR 600 bp (La Scola et al., 2006)
Typing (MLST) 16SrRNA rrs Conventional PCR 541 bp (Ahmed et al., 2006)
Typing (MLST) secY Conventional PCR 549 bp (Ahmed et al., 2006)
Typing (MLST) lipL32 Conventional PCR 474 bp (Ahmed et al., 2006)
Metagenomics 16SrRNA rrs
regions V3-V4
Conventional PCR ~450 bp (Klindworth et al., 2013)
Metagenomics cpn60 (hsp60) Conventional PCR ~550-600 bp (Goh et al., 1996; Klindworth et al., 2013)
Barcoding COI-1 Conventional PCR ~550 bp (Smith et al., 2012)