Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 20;13(6):e0198551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198551

Table 1. Characteristics of the IHS-JVN patients, by gradable or ungradable images.

Characteristic Patients with gradable images for DR or DME Patients with ungradable images for both DR and DME Hypothesis tests of independence, gradable vs. ungradable
(n = 46584) (n = 7414) (n = 53998)
n Column % Row % n Row % Chi-Sq (df) P-value
Social-demographics
 Age
  Less than 50 years 18793 40.3 93.2 1381 6.8 2844.7 (3) < 0.0001
  50 to 59 years 13977 30.0 88.6 1805 11.4
  60 to 69 years 9737 20.9 80.7 2324 19.3
  70 years and older 4077 8.8 68.2 1904 31.8
 Gender*
  Male 20476 44.0 85.0 3627 15.0 64.3 (2) < 0.0001
  Female 26105 56.0 87.3 3786 12.7
 Area
  Southwest 26829 57.6 87.0 4008 13.0 191.2 (5) < 0.0001
  Alaska 499 1.1 88.3 66 11.7
  East of Mississippi River 1743 3.7 79.0 462 21.0
  Northern Plains 4401 9.4 82.4 941 17.6
  Northwest 5326 11.4 86.8 807 13.2
  Oklahoma 7786 16.7 87.3 1130 12.7
Health summary data
 Duration of diabetes
  Less than 1 year 5780 12.4 91.9 511 8.1 1015.2 (4) < 0.0001
  1 to 5 years 12862 27.6 90.5 1347 9.5
  6 to 10 years 9237 19.8 88.3 1220 11.7
  More than 10 years 14769 31.7 80.1 3668 19.9
  Unknown/missing 3936 8.4 85.5 668 14.5
 Diabetes therapy
  Diet only 4287 9.2 87.8 593 12.2 373.3 (4) < 0.0001
  Oral medications 23990 51.5 88.4 3152 11.6
  Insulin only 5467 11.7 80.5 1324 19.5
  Insulin & oral medications 8638 18.5 83.5 1710 16.5
  Unknown/missing 4202 9.0 86.9 635 13.1
 Glycemic control
  A1c of less than 6% (< 42 mmol/mol) 4393 9.4 87.3 638 12.7 77.9 (5) < 0.0001
  A1c of 6 to 7.9% (42 to 63 mmol/mol) 16499 35.4 86.9 2488 13.1
  A1c of 8 to 10% (64 to 86 mmol/mol) 8788 18.9 86.2 1409 13.8
  A1c of greater than 10% (> 86 mmol/mol) 8980 19.3 87.2 1320 12.8
  Missing but poor glycemic control noted 797 1.7 82.6 168 17.4
  Unknown/missing 7127 15.3 83.7 1391 16.3
Technology
 NMFP 30049 64.5 81.2 6948 18.8 2529.8 (1) < 0.0001
 UWFI** 16535 35.5 97.3 466 2.7

Column percentages are shown to characterize the analytic sample, patients with gradable images only.

Row percentages are shown to examine differences in the likelihood of having gradable images, based on patient characteristics.

All chi-square tests examining likelihood of having gradable versus ungradable images (by characteristic) indicate the 2 groups differ along these characteristics.

*3 people were 'other' for gender and were excluded.

**UWFI became available in this program Sept 2014.

IHS-JVN = Indian Health Service-Joslin Vision Network Teleophthalmology Program; DR = diabetic retinopathy; DME = diabetic Macular Edema; NMFP = nonmydriatic flash photography; UWFI = ultrawide-field imaging; df = degrees of freedom.