Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 20;13(6):e0198947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198947

Table 4. Factors for false negative smear microscopy results among the studied laboratories in West Hararghe Zone, Oromia Region, 2015.

Variables False negative COR (95%CI)
AOR (95%CI)
P- value
No Yes
Separate microscope No 8 4 1.01(0.83, 1.23) ------
Yes 34 9 1 ------
IQC practice No 32 11 2.43 (1.09, 5.44) 2.90 (1.25, 6.75) ** 0.013
Yes 10 2 1 1
Preventive maintenance No 27 8 1.06(0.85, 1.21) 1.02(0.85, 1.26)* 0.021
Yes 15 5 1 1
Good specimen quality No 30 10 0.87(0.78, 0.98) ------
Yes 12 3 1 ------
Good smear size
No 30 9 1.05(0.86, 1.30) 1.05(0.87, 1.33)* 0.005
Yes 12 4 1 1
Good smear thickness No 28 10 1.06 (0.86, 1.29) 1.04 (0.69, 1.58)* 0.023
Yes 14 3 1 1
Good staining
No 18 9 2.50 (1.12, 5.58) 2.16 (1.01, 5.11) ** 0.012
Yes 24 4 1 1
Evenness of the smear
No 27 10 1.04(1.03, 1.05) 1.22(0.31, 4.88)* 0.034
Yes 15 3 1 1

IQC: Internal Quality Control; COR: Crude Odds Ratio; AOR: Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval

NB** = significant (P<0.05).

Adjusted*: for separate microscope, IQC practice, preventive maintenance, specimen qualities, smear size, smear thickness, staining and evenness of the smear.