Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 20;13(6):e0199395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199395

Table 2. Patient population, location, payment model, and funding of participating HIV care settings.

All settings (n = 22)
n (%)
Primary care setting (n = 12)
n (%)
Specialist care setting (n = 10)
n (%)
Patient Population
 Any person living with HIV (HIV-specific) 14 (63.6) 6 (50.0) 8 (80.0)
 Members of a specific HIV population (i.e. women, men having sex with men) 1 (4.5) 1 (8.3) 0
 Infected children < 16 years 1 (4.5) 0 1 (10.0)
 Person living with HIV and their family members 1 (4.5) 1 (8.3) 0
 Any (general) population 5 (22.7) 4 (33.3) 1 (10.0)
Rurality
 Urban 20 (90.9) 11 (91.7) 8 (80.0)
 Suburban 2 (9.1) 0 2 (20.0)
 Small town/rural 0 0 0
Location type
 One physical location 13 (59) 7 (58.3) 6 (60.0)
 One physical location linked to affiliated or satellite sites 4 (18) 2 (16.7) 2 (20.0)
 Multiple locations, each managed independently 2 (9.1) 2 (16.7) 0
 Multiple location with coordinated care and shared administration 3 (13.6) 1 (8.3) 2 (20.0)
Payment model
 Fee-for-service 8 (36.4) 4 (33.3) 4 (40.0)
 Capitation or roster 1 (4.5) 1 (8.3) 0
 Salary 3 (13.6) 2 (16.7) 1 (10.0)
 Blended (mix of different models) 8 (36.4) 4 (33.3) 4 (40.0)
 Other 1 (4.5) 1 (8.3) 0
 Missing 1 (4.5) - 1 (10.0)
Funding
 Targeted program/activity funding or grants 9 (40.9) 7 (58.3) 2 (20.0)
 Targeted staffing funding or grants 9 (40.9) 6 (50) 3 (30.0)
 Performance-based financial incentives 3 (13.6) 3 (25) 0
 Academic research grants 7 (31.8) 4 (33.3) 3 (30.0)
 Other 1 (4.5) 1 (8.3) 0
 Missing 1 (4.5) - 1 (10.0)