Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 14;9:974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00974

Table 3.

Exploratory factor analysis of the MEOS-VSF.

Enhance Inauthentic Conceal Worsen Divert
Enhance 3 0.74 0.03 0.02 −0.02 −0.04
Enhance 1 0.73 0.01 −0.01 −0.01 0.03
Enhance 2 0.73 −0.03 0.00 0.01 −0.02
Enhance 4 0.69 −0.02 0.01 0.02 0.10
Inauthentic 1 0.00 0.91 −0.01 −0.13 −0.06
Inauthentic 3 0.03 0.66 −0.09 0.12 −0.07
Inauthentic 2 −0.03 0.64 −0.01 0.10 −0.04
Inauthentic 6 −0.02 0.36 0.06 0.05 0.18
Conceal 1 0.05 0.02 0.75 0.05 −0.06
Conceal 3 −0.04 0.04 0.72 −0.08 0.01
Conceal 4 0.00 −0.01 0.70 −0.06 −0.01
Conceal 2 0.02 −0.06 0.63 0.07 0.02
Worsen 6 0.05 0.06 −0.07 0.68 −0.06
Worsen 2 −0.09 0.01 0.03 0.67 0.00
Worsen 3 0.03 0.02 −0.03 0.60 0.03
Worsen 5 −0.02 −0.02 0.04 0.57 0.01
Divert 3 −0.05 −0.04 0.01 0.09 0.78
Divert 1 0.05 0.02 −0.03 −0.06 0.63
Divert 2 0.04 0.01 −0.02 −0.07 0.62
Divert 5 0.06 −0.01 0.02 0.01 0.53

The factors accounted for 47% of the variance. Pattern matrix elements are shown. Loadings ≥ 0.4 are shown in bold, below 0.4 but > 0.3 in italic. Items are numbered in order of loading size in the EFA of the full MEOS. See Table 5 for item wordings.