Skip to main content
. 2018 May 24;9(12):2082–2092. doi: 10.7150/jca.23681

Table 2.

Meta-analysis results of the association between expression of TOP2A, amplification or alteration of TOP2A and cancer prognosis for pooled HR.

Comparison Categories Group/subgroup Data set number HR(95%CI) P value Model P value I² (%)
Expression (High vs. Low) OS Overall 12 1.25(0.91-1.71) 0.163 R <0.001 71.20%
Europe 4 1.38(1.10-1.73) 0.005 F 0.068 57.90%
Australia 5 1.48(0.79-2.78) 0.218 R <0.001 81.50%
DFS Overall 11 1.36(1.18-1.57) <0.001 F 0.137 32.80%
Europe 6 1.28(1.07-1.52) 0.007 F 0.257 23.60%
Australia 3 1.80(1.07-3.04) 0.028 R 0.044 67.90%
Amplification(Amp vs. non-Amp) OS Overall 13 0.96(0.75-1.22) 0.735 R 0.003 59.40%
Europe 8 1.07(0.80-1.45) 0.644 R 0.007 64.10%
Australia 3 0.66(0.46-0.96) 0.029 F 0.115 53.80%
DFS Overall 5 0.93(0.70-1.23) 0.621 F 0.072 53.60%
RFS Overall 4 0.97(0.71-1.34) 0.867 R 0.036 64.80%
Alteration (Altered vs. Normal) OS Overall 4 1.37(1.22-1.55) <0.001 F 0.238 28.90%
RFS Overall 4 1.26(1.12-1.41) <0.001 F 0.191 36.90%

R: random effect model; F: fixed effect model; OS: overall survival; DFS: disease free survival; RFS: relapse free survival