Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 6;2018:9538671. doi: 10.1155/2018/9538671

Table 3.

Meta-analysis of CETP/LIPC/LPL/ABCA1/ABCG1 polymorphisms compared between PCV and AMD.

Region Gene Polymorphism Ethnicity Associated versus reference allele Number of cohorts Sample size (PCV/AMD) OR (95% CI) Z score P value I 2 (%) P value of Begg's test P value of Egger's test
16q21 CETP rs3764261 Chinese T versus G 3 774/587 1.17 (0.971–1.409) 1.65 0.178 33.6 >0.999 0.572
9q31 ABCA1 rs1883025 Chinese T versus C 3 781/775 1.025 (0.869–1.208) 0.29 0.77 0 >0.999 0.832
9q31 LIPC rs493258 Chinese G versus A 2 483/357 1.123 (0.897–1.407) 1.01 0.312 0 >0.999
15q22 LIPC rs10468017 Chinese T versus C 3 774/587 1.101 (0.892–1.359) 0.89 0.371 0 0.296 0.483
15q22 LPL rs12678919 Asia G versus A 2 541/387 1.163 (0.861–1.572) 0.98 0.325 0 >0.999
21q22 ABCG1 rs57137919 Asia A versus G 4 860/816 1.208 (1.035–1.411) 2.39 0.017 0 0.734 0.156
16q21 CETP rs2303790 Asia G versus A 5 1312/1314 1.067 (0.825–1.378) 0.49 0.622 0 0.462 0.299

Summary of the genetic difference in CETP/LIPC/LPL/ABCA1/ABCG1 polymorphisms between PCV and AMD is shown. PCV: polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; AMD: age-related macular degeneration; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.