Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 20;16:116. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1412-8

Table 2.

Metastatic status of D2 tier lymph nodes of included patients

Lymph node station Positive cases, n (%) Numbers of metastatic LNs
Mean ± SD
Numbers of harvested LNs
Mean ± SD
No. 1 74 (61.2) 0.3 ± 0.9 1.4 ± 1.7
No. 3 58 (47.9) 1.8 ± 2.5 5.4 ± 4.6
No. 4d 32 (26.4) 0.7 ± 1.5 4.4 ± 3.7
No. 4sb 3 (2.5) 0.0 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 1.4
No. 5 15 (12.4) 0.2 ± 0.5 0.7 ± 0.9
No. 6* 34 (28.1) 0.8 ± 1.6 5.0 ± 3.4
No. 6a 8 (6.6) 0.1 ± 0.7 0.9 ± 1.7
No. 6b 8 (6.6) 0.1 ± 0.4 0.9 ± 1.4
No. 6c 26 (21.5) 0.6 ± 1.4 3.2 ± 3.3
No. 7 40 (33.1) 0.7 ± 1.1 4.4 ± 3.2
No. 8a 21 (17.4) 0.2 ± 0.5 1.6 ± 1.2
No. 9 35 (28.9) 0.4 ± 0.9 2.9 ± 2.4
No. 11p 24 (19.8) 0.3 ± 0.8 2.2 ± 1.6
No. 12a 2 (1.7) 0.0 ± 0.1 0.4 ± 0.6

*There were 4 patients and 2 patients with two and four subgroup lymph node metastasis of no. 6 group