Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Feb 22;33(6):1066–1075. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3393

Table 2.

Bone mass, geometry, and microarchitecture determined from micro-CT (mean ± SEM).

Lean
(n = 5–6 rats)
Obese
(n = 6 rats)
Diabetic
(n = 6 rats)
ANOVA
p-value
Vertebra
Bone mass, BMC (mg) 17.0 ± 1.7 33.1 ± 2.4a 19.1 ± 1.1b < 0.001
BV/TV 0.29 ± 0.01 0.28 ± 0.02 0.20 ± 0.01a,b < 0.001
Tb.N (mm−1) 3.4 ± 0.1 3.7 ± 0.2 3.0 ± 0.1b 0.009
Tb.Th (mm) 0.084 ± 0.001 0.080 ± 0.002 0.073 ± 0.003a,b 0.003
Tb.Sp (mm) 0.269 ± 0.010 0.237 ± 0.014 0.304 ± 0.011b 0.005
Conn.D (mm−3) 57 ± 5 97 ± 9a 64 ± 7b 0.003
DA 1.76 ± 0.02 1.83 ± 0.04 1.81 ± 0.02 0.240
SMI -0.07 ± 0.06 0.53 ± 0.2a 0.99 ± 0.08a,b < 0.001
TMD (mg HA/cm3) 1229 ± 7 1198 ± 6a 1194 ± 9a 0.011
Ct.M (%) 70 ± 1 59 ± 3a 71 ± 2 0.006
Vertebral height (mm) 4.04 ± 0.07 4.32 ± 0.10 4.29 ± 0.07 0.220
Ulna
Bone mass, BMC (mg) 38.5 ± 1.2 45.4 ± 0.6a 43.7 ± 1.2a < 0.001
Iap (mm4) 0.25 ± 0.02 0.24 ± 0.01 0.24 ± 0.02 0.849
Iap-avg (mm4) 0.26 ± 0.02 0.27 ± 0.01 0.26 ± 0.02 0.702
Iml (mm4) 0.65 ± 0.03 1.13 ± 0.07a 1.07 ± 0.05a < 0.001
Iml-avg (mm4) 0.82 ± 0.03 1.47 ± 0.07a 1.28 ± 0.07a < 0.001
Section modulus, (mm3) 0.38 ± 0.02 0.39 ± 0.02 0.40 ± 0.02 0.741
TMD (mg HA/cm3) 1293 ± 12 1253 ± 7a 1234 ± 6a < 0.001

a p < 0.05 vs. control by posthoc test

b p < 0.05 vs. obese by posthoc test