Table 8.

Results of MCDA analysis using Favretto et al. (2016) data set.

Iteration	Management alternative	Rank
		Global scaling (Favretto et al., 2016)	Local scaling	Analytic hierarchy process	Compromise programming
		Equal weights	Communal livestock grazing	1	1	2	2
Private cattle ranches	4		3	3	4
Private game ranches	3		4	4	3
Wildlife management areas	2		2	1	1
Initial weighting (Fig. 2 in Favretto et al., 2016)	Communal livestock grazing	1	1	1	1
	Private cattle ranches	2	2	2	2
	Private game ranches	4	4	4	4
	Wildlife management areas	3	3	3	3
Sensitivity iteration 1 (Fig. 3a in Favretto et al., 2016)	Communal livestock grazing	1	1	1	2
	Private cattle ranches	2	2	2	1
	Private game ranches	4	4	4	4
	Wildlife management areas	3	3	3	3
Sensitivity iteration 2 (Fig. 3b in Favretto et al., 2016)	Communal livestock grazing	1	1	1	1
	Private cattle ranches	3	2	3	2
	Private game ranches	4	4	4	4
	Wildlife management areas	2	3	2	3
Sensitivity iteration 3 (Fig. 3c in Favretto et al., 2016)	Communal livestock grazing	1	1	1	1
	Private cattle ranches	3	2	3	3
	Private game ranches	4	4	4	4
	Wildlife management areas	2	3	2	2
Sensitivity iteration 4 (Fig. 3d in Favretto et al., 2016)	Communal livestock grazing	1	1	1	1
	Private cattle ranches	3	2	2	2
	Private game ranches	4	4	4	4
	Wildlife management areas	2	3	3	3
Sensitivity iteration 5 (Fig. 3e in Favretto et al., 2016)	Communal livestock grazing	1	1	1	1
	Private cattle ranches	3	2	3	3
	Private game ranches	4	4	4	4
	Wildlife management areas	2	3	2	2

Note: The sensitivity iterations are described in Favretto et al. (2016) and the specifics are not relevant to this current study.