Table 3.

A Summary of the Seed-Based Connectivity Results

Lesion ID	A	B	C	D	E
Location	Right frontal	Left splenium corpus callosum	Body corpus callosum	Left hippocampus	Right thalamus
Category	Cortical gray/white junction	Periventricular white matter	Periventricular white matter	Cortical gray/white junction	Subcortical gray matter
Size of ROI (no. of voxels)	156	121	96	124	24
Connectivity using ipsilesional ROI	Smaller cluster and not symmetric	No network nodes	No network nodes	No network nodes	No network nodes
Connectivity using contralesional ROI	Shifted connectivity	No network nodes	—	Shifted connectivity and not symmetric	No network nodes

Lesion ID	F	G	H	I	J
Location	Right cerebral peduncle	Left uncinate fasciculus	Left midbrain tegmentum	Left frontal	Right external capsule
Category	Brainstem	Deep white matter	Brainstem	Cortical gray/white junction	Deep white matter
Size of ROI (no. of voxels)	8	29	19	11	28
Connectivity using ipsilesional ROI	No network nodes	Not symmetric	No network nodes	Smaller cluster and not symmetric	No network nodes
Connectivity using contralesional ROI	No network nodes	Smaller cluster and not symmetric	No network nodes	Not symmetric	Not symmetric

Each lesion's location and anatomic category are listed and the characteristics of the connectivity map of the patient using ipsilesional and contralesional ROIs are described compared with controls. Since lesion C is in the middle of brain, there is no contralesional ROI. “No network nodes” indicates that there are no visible clusters of connectivity in the patient nor in the controls; “Not symmetric” indicates that maps of controls show symmetric patterns, however, the corresponding map in the patient does not.

ROI, region-of-interest.