Skip to main content
MicrobiologyOpen logoLink to MicrobiologyOpen
. 2017 Dec 12;7(3):e00565. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.565

Transcriptome analysis and anaerobic C4‐dicarboxylate transport in Actinobacillus succinogenes

Mi Na Rhie 1, Byeonghyeok Park 2, Hyeok‐Jin Ko 2, In‐Geol Choi 2,, Ok Bin Kim 1,
PMCID: PMC6011838  PMID: 29230966

Abstract

A global transcriptome analysis of the natural succinate producer Actinobacillus succinogenes revealed that 353 genes were differentially expressed when grown on various carbon and energy sources, which were categorized into six functional groups. We then analyzed the expression pattern of 37 potential C4‐dicarboxylate transporters in detail. A total of six transporters were considered potential fumarate transporters: three transporters, Asuc_1999 (Dcu), Asuc_0304 (DASS), and Asuc_0270‐0273 (TRAP), were constitutively expressed, whereas three others, Asuc_1568 (DASS), Asuc_1482 (DASS), and Asuc_0142 (Dcu), were differentially expressed during growth on fumarate. Transport assays under anaerobic conditions with [14C]fumarate and [14C]succinate were performed to experimentally verify that A. succinogenes possesses multiple C4‐dicarboxlayte transport systems with different substrate affinities. Upon uptake of 5 mmol/L fumarate, the systems had substrate specificity for fumarate, oxaloacetate, and malate, but not for succinate. Uptake was optimal at pH 7, and was dependent on both proton and sodium gradients. Asuc_1999 was suspected to be a major C4‐dicarboxylate transporter because of its noticeably high and constitutive expression. An Asuc_1999 deletion (∆1999) decreased fumarate uptake significantly at approximately 5 mmol/L fumarate, which was complemented by the introduction of Asuc_1999. Asuc_1999 expressed in Escherichia coli catalyzed fumarate uptake at a level of 21.6 μmol·gDW −1·min−1. These results suggest that C4‐dicarboxylate transport in A. succinogenes is mediated by multiple transporters, which transport various types and concentrations of C4‐dicarboxylates.

Keywords: Actinobacillus succinogenes, C4‐dicarboxylate transport, fumarate, transcriptome analysis

1. INTRODUCTION

C4‐dicarboxylates such as fumarate, succinate, malate, oxaloacetate, and aspartate are relevant intermediates of central metabolism in most living organisms. Because of their direct integration into central metabolic pathways, C4‐dicarboxylates serve as good carbon and energy sources for growth. Some bacteria, such as Pseudomonads and Rhizobia, preferentially utilize C4‐dicarboxylates over glucose and other sugars (Garcia, Bringhurst, Pinedo, & Gage, 2010; Unden, Strecker, Kleefeld, & Kim, 2016; Valentini & Lapouge, 2013). C4‐dicarboxylates are often used as exchange substrates between organisms in symbiotic relationships or in the same ecosystem. In legume‐Rhizobia symbiosis, the bacteroids receive C4‐dicarboxylate from plants at the expense of nitrogen fixation, which is achieved by uptake of malate and efflux of aspartate or ammonium (Prell & Poole, 2006; Yurgel & Kahn, 2004). In the bacterial consortium of Chlorochromatium aggregatum, the phototrophic epibiont appears to provide α‐ketoglutarate or C4‐dicarboxylate for the central motile β‐Proteobacteria in exchange for mobility (Wanner, Vogl, & Overmann, 2008). The genome of the central motile symbiont also contains tripartite ATP‐independent periplasmic (TRAP) dicarboxylate transporters (Liu et al., 2013). The bovine rumen is an ecological niche for many succinate producers such as Wolinella succinogenes, Actinobacillus succinogenes, Mannheimia succiniciproducens, and Basfia succiniciproducens (Baar et al., 2003; Guettler, Rumler, & Jain, 1999; Hong et al., 2004; Kuhnert, Scholten, Haefner, Mayor, & Frey, 2010). Succinate fermenters such as Prevotella ruminicola, Selenomonas ruminantium, and Veillonella alcalescens acquire ATP by decarboxylating succinate to propionate in the rumen (Li et al., 2015). In these contexts, transport systems for C4‐dicarboxylates can play important roles in carbon and energy flow between organisms in an ecosystem. Since there are various C4‐dicarboxylates and cognate transport systems, the mode of each transport system should meet the functional requirements in its ecological niche. C4‐dicarboxylates transporters are classified by the direction of substrate transport into uptake, efflux, and antiport transporters (Janausch, Zientz, Tran, Kröger, & Unden, 2002; Unden et al., 2016).

Actinobacillus succinogenes is a gram‐negative, capnophilic, and facultative aerobic rumen bacterium, and is known as one of the best natural producers of succinate (Guettler et al., 1999; Litsanov, Brocker, Oldiges, & Bott, 2014; McKinlay, Shachar‐Hill, Zeikus, & Vieille, 2007; Rhie et al., 2014). Together with Mannheimia succiniciproducens and Basfia succiniciproducens, A. succinogenes is a nonpathogenic member of the Pasteurellaceae family, and has potential for application in industrial succinate production (Guettler et al., 1999; Kuhnert et al., 2010; Lee, Lee, Hong, & Chang, 2002). The A. succinogenes genome possesses several potential C4‐dicarboxylate transporters (McKinlay et al., 2010; Rhie et al., 2014), which might be selectively employed under different growth conditions. C4‐dicarboxylate consumption and succinate production indicate the presence of various C4‐dicarboxylate transporters (Figure 1). A. succinogenes grown anaerobically on glucose produces succinate at a stoichiometric ratio of 0.82 succinate/1 glucose (mole/mole) (Rhie et al., 2014), which is evidence for succinate efflux activity (Figure 1). Anaerobic growth on fumarate (or L‐malate) with glycerol resulted in 1.6 succinate/1 fumarate (or 1.2 succinate/1 L‐malate) (Rhie et al., 2014), confirming the existence of C4‐dicarboxylate uptake, succinate efflux, and/or C4‐dicarboxylate/succinate exchange in A. succinogenes (Figure 1). Conversely, aerobic growth on fumarate (or L‐malate) depends entirely on C4‐dicarboxylate uptake activity, as only acetate is produced without succinate (Rhie et al., 2014) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Possible C4‐dicarboxylate transport systems related to aerobic and anaerobic metabolism of A. succinogenes, based on product analysis from cultivation. The gray background depicts proteins expressed only under anaerobic growth conditions and white background depicts proteins expressed in both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Suc, succinate; Fum, fumarate; Mal, malate; OAA, oxaloacetate; Pyr, pyruvate; For, formate; Ac‐CoA, acetyl‐CoA; Ace, Acetate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; EMP, Embden‐Meyerhof‐Parnas pathway

In this study, to survey C4‐dicarboxylate transport systems in the transcriptome of A. succinogenes grown using different carbon and energy sources, RNA sequencing (RNA‐seq) analysis was performed in aerobic and anaerobic growth conditions. We investigated anaerobic C4‐dicarboxylate transport processes involving multiple transporters in A. succinogenes. The transporters related to anaerobic fumarate uptake were examined by differentially expressed gene analysis. Among potential C4‐dicarboxylate transporters, Asuc_1999 was identified as a main fumarate uptake transporter with constitutive high expression. To validate its cellular function, we experimentally evaluated the in vivo transport activity of Asuc_1999 with a knockout mutant strain and through expression in Escherichia coli. This research provides insight into the adaptation of A. succinogenes to its ecological niche by utilizing multiple transporter systems to transport different types and concentrations of C4‐dicarboxylates.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Strains and growth conditions

The strains and plasmids used in this study are shown in Table S1. Subcultures of the A. succinogenes strain 130Z were grown in brain–heart infusion (BHI) medium (Difco, USA) at 37°C. Main cultures were grown in modified B‐medium (Guettler et al., 1999) at pH 7.0 containing 8.5 g/L NaH2PO4·H2O (Merck, USA), 15.5 g/L K2HPO4 (Merck), 10.0 g/L Bacto Tryptone (BD Biosciences, USA), 5.0 g/L Bacto yeast extract (BD Biosciences), and 20 mmol/L NaHCO3 (Merck). For growth of the Asuc_1999 mutant strain (LMB018), chloramphenicol (5–15 μg/ml) was added to the medium. E. coli strains were grown in Luria‐Bertani (LB) broth at 37°C for subculture and cloning. Main cultures were grown in eM9 medium, which was M9 minimal medium supplemented with acid‐hydrolyzed casein (0.1%, w/v; Neogen, USA) and L‐tryptophan (0.005%, w/v; Deajung, South Korea) (Kim & Unden, 2007). Where necessary, ampicillin (50–100 μg/ml), kanamycin (25–50 μg/ml), spectinomycin (25–50 μg/ml), or chloramphenicol (15–30 μg/ml) was added. D‐Glucose (Samchun, South Korea), disodium fumarate (Sigma, USA), or glycerol (Duksan, South Korea) was added as a carbon and energy source. Bacteria were incubated under anaerobic conditions at 37°C in degassed medium in rubber‐sealed bottles (20 ml medium in 50‐ml bottles) under a stream of N2/H2 (95:5). Alternatively, bacteria were grown under aerobic conditions by incubation in Erlenmeyer flasks (20 ml medium in 100‐ml flasks) at 37°C with shaking at 180 rpm.

2.2. Total mRNA sequencing analysis

Total RNA was isolated from the A. succinogenes strain 130Z grown on glucose or fumarate under aerobic or anaerobic condition at midexponential growth phase (OD600 of 0.6) using RNAprotect Bacterial Reagent and an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany), and ribosomal RNA was removed using the Ribo‐Zero rRNA Removal Kit (Epicenter, USA). The mRNA library for next‐generation sequencing (NGS) was prepared using the TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, USA). The mRNA library was sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform with MiSeq Reagent Kit v1 (500‐cycles‐PE, Illumina). The sequencing for each growth condition was performed at least in triplicate using three independent culture. Low‐quality (Q < 30) reads were trimmed at the 5′ and 3′ ends using the ShortRead package (Morgan et al., 2009). Bowtie2 (Langmead & Salzberg, 2012) was used for read alignment to the genome sequence of A. succinogenes strain 130Z (NCBI RefSeq ID: NC_009655.1). Gene expression profiling and differential gene expression analysis were carried out using the edgeR and DESeq packages in Bioconductor/R (Table S2). Pairwise comparison by condition was performed with four combinations of growth conditions: aerobic growth on glucose versus aerobic growth on fumarate, anaerobic growth on glucose versus anaerobic growth on fumarate with glycerol, aerobic growth on glucose versus anaerobic growth on glucose, and aerobic growth on fumarate versus anaerobic growth on fumarate with glycerol. In this pairwise comparison by condition, genes with |log (base 2) fold change| ≥1 and adjusted p‐value≤.1 were designated as differentially expressed (Table S3). Heatmap generation and hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed genes were performed using R with pheatmap and hclust, respectively. Clustering of differentially expressed genes was performed using cutree with k = 6.

2.3. Molecular genetics methods

2.3.1. Chromosomal gene inactivation of Asuc_1999

Asuc_1999 was amplified by PCR from A. succinogenes 130Z chromosomal DNA using the primers Asuc_1999_for (5′‐GTG CTA CGA TGT GCA GAC CG‐3′), and Asuc_1999_SmaI_rev (5′‐GGC CCG GGT CCG ATA TAT TA‐3′). The PCR products were cloned into the multiple cloning site of pGEM®‐T Easy (Promega, USA), resulting in the plasmid designated pMB35 (Table S1). The chloramphenicol resistance gene cat from pKD3 was inserted into the middle of Asuc_1999 (pMB35) at the SfoI site, resulting in the plasmid designated pMB45. The DNA fragment Asuc_1999::cat from pMB45 was transferred into pMB31 (at SphI and PstI), producing the suicide knock‐out vector designated pMB47. The pMB31 plasmid contains a levansucrase gene, sacB, from pDM4. The pMB47 plasmid (>2 μg) was transferred into competent A. succinogenes cells by electroporation (Micro‐Pulser, Bio‐Rad, USA), and the cells were incubated on BHI agar containing 10 g/L glucose and 10 μg/ml chloramphenicol at 37°C for 3 days. The replacement of genomic Asuc_1999 with Asuc_1999::cat (pMB47) was achieved by double crossover homologous recombination. To eliminate the remaining pMB47, the colonies were transferred twice onto BHI agar containing 100 g/L sucrose and 15 μg/ml chloramphenicol. The Asuc_1999 deletion in A. succinogenes (LMB18, Δ1999 strain) was confirmed by PCR and sequencing.

2.3.2. Cloning of Asuc_1999

For expression in E. coli, Asuc_1999 was cloned into the pBAD30 vector. The Shine‐Dalgarno sequence (AGGAGG) was introduced by PCR using the primers pBAD30_RBS_for (Eco) (5′‐AGA TAG AGA ATT CAG GAG GGA GCT CGG TAC‐3′), pBAD30_(FspI) rev (5′‐CAG TTA ATA GTT TGC GCA ACG TTG TTG CCA‐3′), and pBAD30 as template. The PCR product was cloned between the EcoRI and FspI sites of pBAD30, resulting in pMB61 (Table S1). Asuc_1999 was amplified using the primers Asuc_1999_SacI_for (5′‐GAT CTT TGG AGC TCG TAT GG‐3′) and Asuc_1999_SphI_rev (5′‐TTC GTT CGT AGC ATG CTA TA‐3′). The PCR product was cloned into the MCS site of the vector pMB61, resulting in the plasmid pMB64 (Table S1). For complementation of A. succinogenes, the PCR product of Asuc_1999 was cloned into the pLS88 vector, resulting in pMB93.

2.4. [14C]fumarate/succinate transport assay

Wild‐type A. succinogenes, the Δ1999 mutant (LMB18), and LMB18 containing pMB93 were grown anaerobically in 50 mL modified B‐medium with fumarate and glycerol (each 20 mmol/L) at 37°C to an OD600 of approximately 0.4. The E. coli strain IMW529, containing pMB64, was grown anaerobically on fumarate plus glycerol (each 50 mmol/L) in eM9 medium with L‐arabinose (20 μmol/L) at 37°C to an OD600 of approximately 0.7. The harvested cells were washed and resuspended in ice‐cold phosphate buffer (100 mmol/L Na2HPO4/KH2PO4 or 100 mmol/L K2HPO4/KH2PO4 and 1 mmol/L MgSO4, adjusted to pH 7) to an OD600 of approximately 7.0, and subsequently degassed on ice. Before commencing the transport assay, the A. succinogenes suspension was preincubated at 37°C for 2 min, and the E. coli suspension for 5 min with lactose (20 mmol/L). The uptake assay commenced by mixing 50 μl cell suspension with 50 μl of various concentrations of radiolabeled [14C]succinate (54.0 mCi/mmol [1,4‐14C]succinate; Moravek Biochemicals, USA) or [14C]fumarate (55.0 mCi/mmol [2,3‐14C]fumarate; Moravek Biochemicals) at 37°C. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 0.9 ml ice‐cold 0.1 mol/L LiCl, followed by rapid vacuum filtration through membrane filters (mixed cellulose ester, diameter 25 mm, 0.2 μm pore size, A020A025A; ADVANTEC®, Japan). The filters were washed twice with ice‐cold 0.1 M LiCl, and the radioactivity of the cells was determined using a liquid scintillation counter (Beckman, USA). Transport assays were performed at least in triplicate using three or more independent cell cultures. The transport activities were calculated by measuring the intracellular concentration of [14C]succinate or [14C]fumarate, based on an OD600 of 1.0 corresponding to 313.8 mg dry weight/liter (A. succinogenes) and 281 mg dry weight/liter (E. coli) (zientz, six, & unden, 1996). To determine the pH‐dependency of transport activity, the initial uptake (1 min) of 5 mmol/L [14C]fumarate was determined in cell suspensions prepared in Na+/K+ phosphate buffer (100 mmol/L Na2HPO4/KH2PO4) adjusted to pH values ranging from 4 to 9. The effects of ionophores on fumarate uptake were measured after the initial uptake (1 min) of 5 mmol/L [14C]fumarate. The protonophore carbonyl cyanide m‐chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP, 20 μmol/L; Sigma), and the ionophores monensin (5 μmol/L; Sigma), valinomycin (5 μmol/L; Sigma), and nigericin (2 μmol/L; Sigma) were preincubated with the cell suspensions at 37°C for 2 min before the start of the assay. Competitive inhibition of fumarate uptake was investigated by assaying 4 mmol/L [14C]fumarate uptake in the presence of 40 mmol/L unlabeled competitors (fumarate, succinate, oxaloacetate, L‐malate, butyrate, lactate, propionate, pyruvate, acetate, glucose, or citrate) for 1 min.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Global analysis of differentially expressed genes with various carbon and energy sources

Transcriptional changes in A. succinogenes grown with different carbon and energy sources were examined by growing the cells aerobically or anaerobically on either glucose or fumarate (four different conditions; fumarate plus glycerol for anaerobic growth). The full results of expression profiling by high throughput sequencing have been deposited into the GEO database with the accession number GSE92722 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE 92722). Among 2,079 predicted protein‐coding genes in the A. succinogenes genome, 353 genes were differentially expressed in at least one pairwise comparison (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Heatmap of 353 clustered over‐ or underexpressed A. succinogenes genes under aerobic or anaerobic growth conditions, with glucose or fumarate. G/N2, anaerobic growth on glucose; F/N2, anaerobic growth on fumarate with glycerol; F/O2, aerobic growth on fumarate; G/O2, aerobic growth on glucose

Next, we classified the 353 differentially expressed genes into six clusters according to their expression patterns (Figure 3, Table S4, Table S5). The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) orthology database and KEGG pathway annotation were used as references for the cellular functions and associated metabolic pathways of each gene.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Expression profiles of differentially expressed genes associated with six clusters. Black lines indicate the average profile of each cluster. G/N2, anaerobic growth on glucose; F/N2, anaerobic growth on fumarate with glycerol; F/O2, aerobic growth on fumarate; G/O2, aerobic growth on glucose

Cluster 1 consisted of 43 genes, which had the highest expression levels under anaerobic growth on fumarate with glycerol (Figure 3, Table S4, Table S5). It contained several glycerol‐related genes, including glycerol‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (Asuc_0203‐5), glycerophosphoryl diester phosphodiesterase (Asuc_0592), glycerol‐3‐phosphate transporter (Asuc_0593), glycerol uptake facilitator (Asuc_1603), and glycerol kinase (Asuc_1604). A few iron‐related transporter genes (Asuc_1715‐8, Asuc_1014, and Asuc_1820‐1) were also grouped in cluster 1, whereas fumarate related genes were not noted.

Cluster 2 comprised 81 genes that had high expression in both aerobic growth conditions (Figure 3, Table S4, Table S5). Genes involved in aerobic carbon metabolism, including the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (Asuc_0942‐4), were differentially upregulated in aerobic conditions. In addition, two superoxide dismutases (Asuc_0668 and Asuc_0800) were upregulated, which eliminate reactive oxygen species arising from aerobic respiration.

Cluster 3 was a group of 26 anaerobic‐specific genes (Figure 3, Table S4, Table S5). Interestingly, five genes in the purine metabolism pathway (KEGG accession asu00230) were grouped into cluster 3: ribose‐phosphate pyrophosphokinase (Asuc_1752), phosphor‐ribosylamine‐glycine ligase (Asuc_1148), phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase (Asuc_0730), phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine cyclo‐ligase (Asuc_0729), and phosphor‐ribosylaminoimidazolecarboxamide formyltransferase/inosine monophosphate (IMP) cyclohydrolase (Asuc_1147). These genes are related to the biosynthetic conversion of ribose‐5P to IMP. Since IMP is the precursor of several purine compounds, such as AMP and GMP, this suggests that A. succinogenes may require more purine‐containing compounds for anaerobic growth.

Cluster 4 consisted of 93 genes with highest expression under aerobic conditions on glucose (Figure 3, Table S4, Table S5). Four of these genes were members of the biosynthetic module of UDP‐2,3‐diacetamido‐2,3‐dideoxy‐alpha‐D‐glucuronate (Asuc_0108‐0111), and several were aspartate‐related genes: aspartate kinase (Asuc_0925), aspartate transaminase (Asuc_1574), and aspartate‐ammonia ligase (Asuc_0503).

Sixty‐five genes were classified into cluster 5. The expression level of these genes was the highest under anaerobic conditions on glucose (Figure 3, Table S4, Table S5). Genes encoding ribosomal proteins (Asuc_0015, Asuc_0044‐5, Asuc_0520, Asuc_0525, Asuc_0721, Asuc_0774, Asuc_1493‐4, and Asuc_2117) and their accessory proteins were among those classified into this cluster. In addition, members of the beta‐glucoside operon (Asuc_0972‐5) and 11 genes related to the maltose operon (Asuc_0312‐3, Asuc_0315‐0323) were grouped in cluster 5.

Cluster 6 was a fumarate‐specific cluster containing 45 genes (Figure 3, Table S4, Table S5). Genes encoding proteins involved in the ABC transporter system, a ribose transporter (Asuc_0081‐3), an iron (III) transporter (Asuc_1681‐2) and a methylgalactoside transporter (Asuc_1897‐8) were grouped into this cluster.

3.2. Differential gene expression of C4‐dicarboxylate transport systems with different carbon and energy sources

The genome of A. succinogenes revealed 306 transporter genes (Ren, Chen, & Paulsen, 2007), 37 of which potentially encode transport systems for C4‐dicarboxylates. Differential expression of potential A. succinogenes C4‐dicarboxylate transporters was investigated using RNA‐seq analysis during growth on fumarate or glucose under aerobic and anaerobic conditions (Table 1).

Table 1.

Gene expression related to C4‐dicarboxylate transport system based on transcriptome analysis by RNAseq. A. succinogenes was grown on glucose or fumarate (fumarate plus glycerol for anaerobic growth) under anaerobic and aerobic conditions

Gene locus Function RPKM Fum O2vs. Fum N2 Gluc O2vs. Gluc N2 Fum O2vs. Gluc O2 Fum N2vs. Gluc N2
FumO2 FumaN2 GlucO2 GlucN2 logFC p‐value logFC p‐value logFC p‐value logFC p‐value
The Divalent Anion:Na+ Symporter (DASS) Family
Asuc_0020 anion transporter 87 68 171 91 −0.390 .678 −0.872 .350 0.984 .296 0.491 .600
Asuc_0183 divalent anion:Na+ symporter 29 11 39 18 −1.368 .178 −1.025 .286 0.451 .641 0.790 .428
Asuc_0304 Na+ dependent C4‐dicarboxylate transporter 269 306 266 252 0.176 .849 −0.068 .941 0.030 .974 −0.228 .805
Asuc_1482 divalent anion:Na+ symporter 282 78 268 44 −1.914 .047 −2.543 .009 −0.062 .946 −0.702 .454
Asuc_1568 Na+ dependent dicarboxylate transporter 1201 223 289 98 −2.433 .012 −1.547 .101 −2.009 .036 −1.138 .224
The C4‐Dicarboxylate Uptake (Dcu) Family
Asuc_0142 anaerobic C4‐dicarboxylate transporter DcuB 187 136 202 512 −0.418 .654 1.378 .143 0.062 .947 1.845 .053
Asuc_1999 anaerobic C4‐dicarboxylate transporter DcuB 2208 2072 1707 1939 −0.109 .906 0.229 .803 −0.345 .708 −0.022 .981
The C4‐Dicarboxylate Uptake C (DcuC) Family
Asuc_1063 anaerobic C4‐dicarboxylate transporter DcuC 230 188 97 73 −0.381 .682 −0.366 .694 −1.312 .165 −1.312 .164
The Tripartite ATP‐independent Periplasmic Transporter (TRAP‐T) Family
Asuc_0146 DctP (SBP) 268 50 81 92 −2.398 .015 0.269 .774 −1.810 .060 0.847 .374
Asuc_0147 DctQ 40 3 15 8 −3.169 .009 −0.645 .566 −1.465 .185 1.086 .370
Asuc_0148 DctM 43 9 24 11 −2.181 .035 −0.968 .324 −0.856 .382 0.352 .727
Asuc_0156 DctM 16 5 9 7 −1.288 .219 −0.279 .786 −0.887 .395 0.115 .912
Asuc_0157 DctQ 2 1 7 3 −0.630 .715 −0.999 .457 1.421 .365 1.189 .438
Asuc_0158 DctP (SBP) 19 5 21 11 −1.572 .145 −0.741 .463 0.027 .979 0.857 .414
Asuc_0270 DctQ 77 87 88 33 0.096 .921 −1.331 .172 0.188 .846 −1.252 .196
Asuc_0271 DctM 80 144 90 51 0.751 .425 −0.818 .384 0.136 .885 −1.447 .127
Asuc_0272 DctP (SBP) 233 203 187 154 −0.211 .821 −0.271 .770 −0.263 .777 −0.337 .717
Asuc_0273 DctP (SBP) 145 181 147 108 0.279 .765 −0.480 .606 0.012 .990 −0.762 .415
Asuc_0366 DctP (SBP) 163 69 44 38 −1.279 .182 −0.170 .858 −1.858 .056 −0.766 .421
Asuc_0367 DctQ 84 25 16 20 −1.695 .092 0.252 .805 −2.305 .027 −0.384 .697
Asuc_0368 DctM 94 44 33 19 −1.103 .249 −0.718 .453 −1.478 .125 −1.109 .248
Asuc_1163 DctP (SBP) 31 18 24 23 −0.865 .398 0.096 .922 −0.484 .628 0.465 .643
Asuc_1164 DctQ 13 5 17 10 −1.037 .392 −0.551 .614 0.281 .809 0.776 .501
Asuc_1165 DctM 37 24 34 24 −0.657 .506 −0.420 .661 −0.202 .835 0.025 .979
Asuc_1577 DctM 49 35 42 54 −0.453 .637 0.458 .627 −0.235 .806 0.667 .482
Asuc_1578 DctQ 43 9 19 30 −1.972 .072 0.625 .539 −1.014 .332 1.584 .138
Asuc_1579 DctP (SBP) 40 27 48 48 −0.664 .500 0.024 .980 0.218 .821 0.900 .355
Asuc_1921 DctM 29 33 36 41 0.182 .852 0.230 .808 0.242 .802 0.276 .773
Asuc_1922 DctQ 6 6 5 5 0.391 .755 −0.405 .719 0.214 .854 −0.595 .605
Asuc_1923 DctP (SBP) 23 32 35 23 0.490 .622 −0.577 .549 0.631 .525 −0.447 .643
Asuc_1956 TAXI (SBP) 23 8 27 12 −1.594 .139 −0.972 .329 0.105 .917 0.725 .492
Asuc_1957 DctM 14 7 18 10 −0.983 .329 −0.794 .415 0.172 .861 0.353 .722
Asuc_1988 TAXI (SBP) 218 173 856 292 −0.370 .692 −1.567 .097 1.941 .043 0.733 .432
Asuc_1989 UspA domain‐containing protein 190 188 789 301 −0.015 .987 −1.342 .153 1.987 .040 0.650 .492
Asuc_1990 DctM 168 129 863 231 −0.460 .619 −1.905 .045 2.326 .016 0.869 .350
Asuc_1991 TAXI (SBP) 683 533 9599 1193 −0.398 .667 −2.920 .003 3.714 .000 1.180 .207
The Tricarboxylate Transporter (TTT) Family
Asuc_1851 tricarboxylic transport protein 17 20 14 20 0.243 .808 0.464 .630 −0.158 .873 0.051 .958

RPKM, reads per kilobase million; Fum, fumarate; Gluc, glucose; O2, aerobic; N2, anaerobic; logFC, log2 (fold change).

a

For anaerobic growth on fumarate, glycerol was supplied as carbon and energy source.

We divided potential C4‐dicarboxylate transporter genes into two functional classes based on their gene expression pattern (Figure 4): (1) transporter genes that were differentially expressed (DE) under specific growth conditions were designated as DE C4DC transporters. The cut‐off threshold for DE transporter expression was both |log2 fold change (logFC)| ≥ 1.0 and p‐value ≤.1, and (2) transporter genes that were constitutively expressed (CE) across all experimental conditions were designated as CE C4DC transporters. We selected CE transporter genes when their expression was within the top 25% of expression levels in any experimental condition. By this functional categorization, three potential C4‐dicarboxylate transporters, Asuc_0272 (TRAP family, clustered with three other subunit genes, Asuc_0270, Asuc_0271, and Asuc_0273), Asuc_0304 (divalent anion‐sodium symporter (DASS) family), and Asuc_1999 (C4‐dicarboxylate uptake (Dcu) family) were designated as CE transporters (Table 1, Figure 4). Among the three, the transcription level of Asuc_1999 was markedly higher than the other transporters in all tested conditions (Table 1), suggesting that it is an important C4‐dicarboxylate transporter. The constitutive gene expression of Asuc_0304 has been demonstrated previously by quantitative real‐time PCR (Rhie et al., 2014).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Plot of a log scale of reads per million mapped reads (logRPKM) for 37 potential C4‐dicarboxylate transporter genes under aerobic and anaerobic growth conditions with fumarate or glucose. The differentially expressed (DE) C4‐dicarboxylate transporters (DE C4 DC transporters) and consistently expressed (CE) C4‐dicarboxylate transporters (CE C4 DC transporters) are indicated in purple and red, respectively. The expression of transporters other than C4‐dicarboxylate transporters (Other transporters, green) and the expression of proteins other than transporters (Other genes, gray) are shown for reference

Following aerobic growth on fumarate, Asuc_1568 (DASS family), Asuc_1482 (DASS family), and Asuc_0146 (TRAP family) were classified as DE transporters (Table 1, Figure 4). A. succinogenes grown aerobically on fumarate may require only uptake activity for C4‐dicarboxylate (Figure 1). In a previous study, Asuc_0304 was shown to be a sodium‐coupled C4‐dicarboxylate transporter (ScdA) under aerobic condition, although the gene expression was not affected by the presence of fumarate or oxygen (Rhie et al., 2014).

Anaerobic growth of Asuccinogenes on glucose may require an efflux transporter for succinate (Figure 1), as only Asuc_0142 was differentially expressed under these conditions (Table 1, Figure 4). Conversely, C4‐dicarboxylate transporters do not seem to be active during aerobic growth on glucose; the metabolic products of this carbon source were acetate and formate only (Rhie et al., 2014). It is, therefore, interesting that TRAP (Asuc_1988, Asuc_1990, and Asuc_1991) and DASS (Asuc_1482) family transporters were designated as DE transporters under aerobic growth conditions on glucose (Table 1, Figure 4). A TRAP transport system (Asuc_1988–1991) was highly overexpressed during aerobic growth on glucose. The predicted substrates for Asuc_1988–1991 are sugar acids (aldonic or uronic acids), as aldolase (D‐glucose) without a carboxylate moiety did not serve as a substrate for the substrate binding protein of the TRAP transporter (Vetting et al., 2015). Most other TRAP transporters (Asuc_0147–0148, Asuc_0156–0158, Asuc_1163–1165, Asuc_1578, Asuc_1922–1923, and Asuc_1956–1957) and the tripartite tricarboxylate transporter (TTT) family transporter (Asuc_1851) were not differentially expressed under any experimental condition (Table 1).

As a result, the three CE transport systems that may play a basic role in A. succinogenes growth in any condition are a TRAP transporter (Asuc_0271‐0273) and a DASS transporter (Asuc_0304), which may be involved in fumarate uptake, and a Dcu transporter (Asuc_1999) which may be involved in fumarate uptake, fumarate/succinate antiport, or succinate efflux. Among the DE transporters, additional DASS transporters (Asuc_1568 and Asuc_1482) may contribute to fumarate uptake during aerobic growth on fumarate, whereas a Dcu transporter (Asuc_0142) may play a role in succinate efflux during anaerobic growth on glucose.

3.3. Experimental verification of multiple C4‐dicarboxylate transport systems in A. succinogenes

The concentration‐dependent uptake of [14C]fumarate and [14C]succinate in A. succinogenes was investigated using filtration assays with cell suspensions of bacteria anaerobically grown on fumarate plus glycerol (Figure 5). The overall uptake activity for fumarate (V max 55.8 μmol·gDW−1·min−1) was 4.7‐fold higher than that of succinate (V max 11.9 μmol·gDW−1·min−1). Interestingly, there were three saturation shoulders for [14C]fumarate uptake, in the concentration ranges of (1) 20 μmol/L to 500 μmol/L, (2) 500 μmol/L to 3 mmol/L, and (3) 3 mmol/L to 5 mmol/L, which were supposed to be caused by multiple (at least three) transport systems. The first saturation curve had a V max of 7.5 μmol·gDW−1·min−1 (Km 201.1 μmol/L); the second had a V max of 38.0 μmol·gDW−1·min−1 (Km 2.5 mmol/L); and the third had a V max of 58.09 μmol·gDW−1·min−1 (Km 4.9 mmol/L). Therefore, the anaerobic fumarate uptake of A. succinogenes is mediated by multiple transport systems that could be differentiated by substrate affinity. Conversely, anaerobic succinate uptake displayed carrier‐mediated transport with a single saturation point, although it has low affinity with a Km of 1.2 mmol/L (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Concentration‐dependent uptake of C4‐dicarboxylates in cell suspensions of A. succinogenes. The initial uptake (1 min) of [14C]fumarate (●) and [14C]succinate (Inline graphic) was determined at substrate concentrations from 0 to 5 mmol/L. The assays were performed at least in triplicate using three or more independent cell cultures

3.4. Properties of anaerobic fumarate uptake in A. succinogenes

The properties of anaerobic fumarate uptake were studied using 4 (or 5) mmol/L of [14C]fumarate to examine the overall uptake activity shown in Figure 5. The pH‐dependency of [14C]fumarate uptake was measured in a buffer range from pH 4 to 9 (Figure 6a). The uptake activity was the highest at pH 7 and decreased at acidic or basic pH. This pH profile indicates that dianionic fumarate2− (pKa1 = 3.03, pKa2 = 4.44) was preferred by the transporter(s).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Properties of fumarate uptake in cell suspensions of A. succinogenes. (a) Effect of pH. The initial uptake (1 min) of 5 mmol/L [14C]fumarate was determined in cells suspended in Na+/K+ phosphate buffer of pH 4 to 9. (b) Substrate specificity. The initial uptake (1 min) of 4 mmol/L [14C]fumarate was determined in the presence of unlabeled competitors (40 mmol/L); 100% uptake activity corresponds to 21.1 μmol·gDW −1·min−1. Noc, no competitor; Fum, fumarate; Suc, succinate; OAA, oxaloacetate; Mal, malate; But, butyrate; Lac, lactate; Pro, propionate; Pyr, pyruvate; Ace, acetate; Glc, glucose. (c) Effect of sodium and ionophores. The initial uptake (1 min) of 5 mmol/L [14C]fumarate was determined in the presence of ionophores. Cell suspensions were prepared in Na+‐containing (Na2 HPO 4/KH 2 PO 4) or Na+‐free (K2 HPO 4/KH 2 PO 4) buffers at pH 7. +Na+, Na+‐containing buffer; −Na+, Na+‐free buffer; CCCP, carbonyl cyanide m‐chlorophenylhydrazone; Mon, monensin; Val, valinomycin; Nig, nigericin. The assays were performed at least in triplicate using three or more independent cell cultures

The substrate specificity for uptake was investigated by competitive inhibition with a 10‐fold excess of unlabeled C4‐dicarboxylates or related substrates (40 mmol/L) to [14C]fumarate (4 mmol/L; Figure 6b). The inhibition rates of anaerobic [14C]fumarate uptake were 65, 67, and 76% by the unlabeled C4‐dicarboxylates fumarate, oxaloacetate, and malate, respectively. However, succinate could not compete with [14C]fumarate. The monocarboxylates butyrate (37%), propionate (43%), and acetate (48%) decreased uptake to some extent, but lactate, pyruvate, citrate, and glucose did not inhibit [14C]fumarate uptake. The competition assay suggests that fumarate, oxaloacetate, and malate are the preferred substrates for the uptake system(s), with similar specificity. But succinate could not inhibit [14C]fumarate uptake.

Various ionophores were used to investigate the driving forces of anaerobic uptake of fumarate (Figure 6c). CCCP is known to collapse the electrochemical proton potential Δp (Nicholls & Ferguson, 2013), and inhibited 70% of the fumarate uptake. The electroneutral H+/Na+ exchanger monensin inhibited 60% of the fumarate uptake, which was similar to the inhibition observed in Na+ free buffer (66%), indicating that fumarate uptake requires a Na+‐gradient in addition to proton potential. The electroneutral (nondepolarizing) H+/K+ exchanger nigericin decreased fumarate uptake by 55%, but the electrical K+ uniporter valinomycin only decreased uptake by 38%, meaning that dissipation of the pH gradient negatively affected fumarate uptake. Altogether, these results indicate that the transport system(s) for 5 mmol/L fumarate uptake require(s) electrochemical proton potential Δp, pH gradient ∆pH, and a Na+ gradient (ΔΨNa+), whereas a K+ gradient (ΔΨK+) appears to be of minor significance.

The assays with A. succinogenes showed relatively high background activity, which could be explained by the involvement of more than one transporter in fumarate uptake.

3.5. Fumarate transport by the high‐copy transporter Asuc_1999

Owing to its high transcription under all tested growth conditions, Asuc_1999 was considered a major C4‐dicarboxylate transporter (Table 1). Asuc_1999 is 555 amino acids long, and belongs to the Dcu family, showing 85% sequence similarity with E. coli DucB (DucBEc, 446 aa), which is the fumarate/succinate antiporter in fumarate respiration (Janausch et al., 2002; Unden et al., 2016). We established a gene knockout system for A. succinogenes and constructed the Asuc_1999 deletion (Δ1999) mutant LMB18. In the Δ1999 mutant, the anaerobic fumarate uptake was decreased by 24% at 5 mmol/L fumarate, and the difference between the wild‐type (31.4 μmol·gDW−1·min−1) and ∆1999 strain (23.9 μmol·gDW−1·min−1) rates was 7.5 μmol·gDW−1·min−1 (Figure 7a). The decrease in fumarate uptake in Δ1999 was not detectable at low fumarate concentrations (<1 mmol/L), suggesting that the role of Asuc_1999 could be compensated by other transporters at low concentration. The fumarate uptake of the ∆1999 strain was completely complemented by introduction of Asuc_1999 (pMB93), which was cloned into a broad‐host‐range plasmid of Pasteurellaceae origin, to 31.1 μmol·gDW−1·min−1 (Table 2).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Concentration‐dependent uptake of fumarate in wild type (●) and Δ1999 mutant (Inline graphic) A. succinogenes strains. The initial uptake (1 min) of [14C]fumarate (a) and [14C]succinate (b) was determined at a substrate concentrations from 0 to 5 mmol/L. The assays were performed at least in triplicate using three or more independent cell cultures

Table 2.

Complementation of fumarate uptake of A. succinogenes Δ1999 mutant (LMB18) with pMB93 containing Asuc_1999

A. succinogenes strains [14C]fumarate uptake (μmol·gDW−1·min−1)
wild type 31.4 ± 2.1
LMB18 23.9 ± 1.5
LMB18 +  pMB93 31.1 ± 3.3

The initial uptake (1 min) was determined with 5 mmol/L [14C]fumarate. The assays were performed at least in triplicate using three or more independent cell cultures.

In addition, the anaerobic uptake by Asuc_1999 was determined directly, albeit heterologously, by cloning Asuc_1999 into a low‐copy expression plasmid (pMB64) and expressing it in the E. coli strain IMW529 (Figure 8), which is deficient in anaerobic fumarate transport (Kim & Unden, 2007). The C4‐dicarboxylate uptake activity of pMB64 showed a clear carrier‐mediated fashion dependent on substrate concentration. The heterologous fumarate uptake activity revealed a V max of 21.6 μmol·gDW−1·min−1 with K m of 452 μmol/L. The uptake activity for succinate (V max 5.4 μmol∙gDW−1∙min−1; K m 364 μmol/L) was fourfold lower than fumarate (Figure 8), corresponding that Asuc_1999 knockout only slightly decreased succinate uptake (Figure 7b).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Anaerobic C4‐dicarboxylate uptake of Asuc_1999 in the E. coli strain IMW529. The initial uptake (1 min) of [14C]fumarate (●) or [14C]succinate (Inline graphic) was determined at a substrate concentrations from 0 to 5 mmol/L. The assays were performed at least in triplicate using three or more independent cell cultures

4. CONCLUSION

A. succinogenes grows well on fumarate plus glycerol under anaerobic conditions. Supplied fumarate is completely converted into succinate, and half of the supplied glycerol is also converted to succinate. As a result, it is assumed that growth requires transporters for fumarate uptake and succinate efflux. Anaerobic transport assays revealed that multiple transport systems in A. succinogenes catalyzing fumarate uptake, with distinct substrate affinity and activity. RNAseq analysis showed that three potential C4‐dicarboxylate transport systems, namely Asuc_0271‐0273 (TRAP), Asuc_0304 (DASS), and Asuc_1999 (Dcu), were expressed during anaerobic growth on fumarate plus glycerol. The transcription level of Asuc_1999 was markedly higher than that of other C4‐dicarboxylate transport genes under all tested growth conditions (aerobic and anaerobic conditions with glucose or fumarate). The deletion of Asuc_1999 caused a significant decrease in fumarate uptake at high fumarate concentrations, which was complemented by reintroducing Asuc_1999. In addition, Asuc_1999 heterologously expressed in E. coli catalyzed fumarate uptake. Overall, the results indicate that Asuc_1999 could be a common C4‐dicarboxylate transporter exhibiting high fumarate uptake activity.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program and Basic Research Laboratory (BRL) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF‐2015R1C1A2A01053608), and (NRF‐2015R1A4A1041997). We are grateful to Kun‐Soo Kim (Sogang Univ., Seoul) and Gottfried Unden (Mainz Univ., Mainz) for supplying plasmids, and Seon Min Jeon (Seoul) for experimental support.

Rhie MN, Park B, Ko H‐J, Choi I‐G, Kim OB. Transcriptome analysis and anaerobic C4‐dicarboxylate transport in Actinobacillus succinogenes . MicrobiologyOpen. 2018;7:e565 10.1002/mbo3.565

Mi Na Rhie and Byeonghyeok Park contributed equally to this work

Contributor Information

In‐Geol Choi, Email: igchoi@korea.ac.kr.

Ok Bin Kim, Email: kimokbin@ewha.ac.kr.

REFERENCES

  1. Baar, C. , Eppinger, M. , Raddatz, G. , Simon, J. , Lanz, C. , Klimmek, O. , …. Jagtap, P. (2003). Complete genome sequence and analysis of Wolinella succinogenes . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 11690–11695. 10.1073/pnas.1932838100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Garcia, P. P. , Bringhurst, R. M. , Pinedo, C. A. , & Gage, D. J. (2010). Characterization of a two‐component regulatory system that regulates succinate‐mediated catabolite repression in Sinorhizobium meliloti . Journal of Bacteriology, 192, 5725–5735. 10.1128/JB.00629-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Guettler, M. V. , Rumler, D. , & Jain, M. K. (1999). Actinobacillus succinogenes sp. nov., a novel succinic‐acid‐producing strain from the bovine rumen. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 49, 207–216. 10.1099/00207713-49-1-207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hong, S. H. , Kim, J. S. , Lee, S. Y. , In, Y. H. , Choi, S. S. , Rih, J.‐K. , …. Kim, J. J. (2004). The genome sequence of the capnophilic rumen bacterium Mannheimia succiniciproducens . Nature Biotechnology, 22, 1275–1281. 10.1038/nbt1010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Janausch, I. , Zientz, E. , Tran, Q. , Kröger, A. , & Unden, G . (2002). C4‐dicarboxylate carriers and sensors in bacteria. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)‐Bioenergetics, 1553, 39–56. 10.1016/S0005-2728(01)00233-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kim, O. B. , & Unden, G. (2007). The L‐tartrate/succinate antiporter TtdT (YgjE) of L‐tartrate fermentation in Escherichia coli . Journal of Bacteriology, 189, 1597–1603. 10.1128/JB.01402-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kuhnert, P. , Scholten, E. , Haefner, S. , Mayor, D. , & Frey, J. (2010). Basfia succiniciproducens gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Pasteurellaceae isolated from bovine rumen. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 60, 44–50. 10.1099/ijs.0.011809-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Langmead, B. , & Salzberg, S. L. (2012). Fast gapped‐read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature Methods, 9, 357–359. 10.1038/nmeth.1923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee, P. , Lee, S. , Hong, S. , & Chang, H. (2002). Isolation and characterization of a new succinic acid‐producing bacterium, Mannheimia succiniciproducens MBEL55E, from bovine rumen. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 58, 663–668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Li, X. Z. , Park, B. K. , Shin, J. S. , Choi, S. H. , Smith, S. B. , & Yan, C. G. (2015). Effects of dietary linseed oil and propionate precursors on ruminal microbial community, composition, and diversity in yanbian yellow cattle. PLoS ONE, 10, e0126473 10.1371/journal.pone.0126473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Litsanov, B. , Brocker, M. , Oldiges, M. , & Bott, M . (2014). Succinic acid. Bioprocessing of Renewable Resources to Commodity Bioproducts, Ch 16, 435–472. 10.1002/9781118845394 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu, Z. , Müller, J. , Li, T. , Alvey, R. M. , Vogl, K. , Frigaard, N.‐U. , … Henke, P. (2013). Genomic analysis reveals key aspects of prokaryotic symbiosis in the phototrophic consortium “Chlorochromatium aggregatum”. Genome Biology, 14, 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McKinlay, J. , Laivenieks, M. , Schindler, B. , McKinlay, A. , Siddaramappa, S. , Challacombe, J. , … Harkins, V. (2010). A genomic perspective on the potential of Actinobacillus succinogenes for industrial succinate production. BMC Genomics, 11, 680 10.1186/1471-2164-11-680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McKinlay, J. B. , Shachar‐Hill, Y. , Zeikus, J. G. , & Vieille, C. (2007). Determining Actinobacillus succinogenes metabolic pathways and fluxes by NMR and GC‐MS analyses of 13C‐labeled metabolic product isotopomers. Metabolic Engineering, 9, 177–192. 10.1016/j.ymben.2006.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Morgan, M. , Anders, S. , Lawrence, M. , Aboyoun, P. , Pagès, H. , & Gentleman, R. (2009). ShortRead: A bioconductor package for input, quality assessment and exploration of high‐throughput sequence data. Bioinformatics, 25, 2607–2608. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nicholls, D. G. , & Ferguson, S . (2013). Bioenergetics. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  17. Prell, J. , & Poole, P. (2006). Metabolic changes of rhizobia in legume nodules. Trends in Microbiology, 14, 161–168. 10.1016/j.tim.2006.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ren, Q. , Chen, K. , & Paulsen, I. T. (2007). TransportDB: A comprehensive database resource for cytoplasmic membrane transport systems and outer membrane channels. Nucleic Acids Research, 35, D274–D279. 10.1093/nar/gkl925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rhie, M. N. , Yoon, H. E. , Oh, H. Y. , Zedler, S. , Unden, G. , & Kim, O. B. (2014). A Na+‐coupled C4‐dicarboxylate transporter (Asuc_0304) and aerobic growth of Actinobacillus succinogenes on C4‐dicarboxylates. Microbiology, 160, 1533–1544. 10.1099/mic.0.076786-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Unden, G. , Strecker, A. , Kleefeld, A. , & Kim, O. B . (2016). C4‐dicarboxylate utilization in aerobic and anaerobic growth. EcoSal Plus, 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Valentini, M. , & Lapouge, K. (2013). Catabolite repression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 regulates the uptake of C4‐dicarboxylates depending on succinate concentration. Environmental Microbiology, 15, 1707–1716. 10.1111/1462-2920.12056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Vetting, M. W. , Al‐Obaidi, N. , Zhao, S. , San Francisco, B. , Kim, J. , Wichelecki, D. J. , … Almo, S. C. (2015). Experimental strategies for functional annotation and metabolism discovery: Targeted screening of solute binding proteins and unbiased panning of metabolomes. Biochemistry, 54, 909–931. 10.1021/bi501388y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wanner, G. , Vogl, K. , & Overmann, J. (2008). Ultrastructural characterization of the prokaryotic symbiosis in “Chlorochromatium aggregatum”. Journal of Bacteriology, 190, 3721–3730. 10.1128/JB.00027-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Yurgel, S. N. , & Kahn, M. L. (2004). Dicarboxylate transport by rhizobia. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 28, 489–501. 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zientz, E. , Six, S. , & Unden, G . (1996). Identification of a third secondary carrier (DcuC) for anaerobic C4‐dicarboxylate transport in Escherichia coli: Roles of the three dcu carriers in uptake and exchange. Journal of Bacteriology, 178, 7241–7247. 10.1128/jb.178.24.7241-7247.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Articles from MicrobiologyOpen are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES