Skip to main content
NIST Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIST Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017 Dec 9;410(4):1265–1278. doi: 10.1007/s00216-017-0766-z

Development of a kelp powder (Thallus laminariae) Standard Reference Material

Lee L Yu 1,*, Joseph F Browning 1, Carolyn Q Burdette 1, George C Caceres 1, Kaitlyn D Chieh 1, W Clay Davis 1, Brittany L Kassim 1, Stephen E Long 1, Karen E Murphy 1, Rabia Oflaz 1, Rick L Paul 1, Katherine E Sharpless 1, Laura J Wood 1, James H Yen 2, Rolf Zeisler 1
PMCID: PMC6013078  NIHMSID: NIHMS971720  PMID: 29222652

Abstract

A Standard Reference Material (SRM) of seaweed, SRM 3232 Kelp Powder (Thallus laminariae) has been developed to support food and dietary supplement measurements in compliance with the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) and the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA). The material was characterized for nutritional minerals, arsenic species, isomers of vitamin K1, proximates, and toxic elements. Kelp is a rich source of vitamins and minerals, and it is an excellent source of dietary iodine. Kelp also contains a large amount of arsenic, which is toxic as inorganic species but much less so as organic species. To capture the dietary profile of kelp, certified values were issued for As, Ca, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, I, K, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Pb, and Zn. Reference values for proximates were assigned. For the first time, a certified value for iodine, reference values for isomers of vitamin K1, and reference values for arsenic species including arsenosugars were assigned in a seaweed. SRM 3232 fills a gap in Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) needed for quality assurance and method validation in the compositional measurements of kelp and similar seaweeds as food and as dietary supplements.

Keywords: Kelp, Laminaria, iodine, arsenosugar, vitamin K1, SRM

Introduction

Humans have been eating seaweeds for millennia. Early written accounts of seaweeds used as food can be traced back to 300 AD in China [1], 400 AD in Japan [2], and 600 AD in Ireland [1]. Seaweeds were served in 21 % of meals in Japan based on a 2001 research report of a typical Japanese diet [3]. The per capita consumption there nearly doubled from (5.2 ± 0.9, 1 standard deviation (SD)) g/d between 1949 and 1996 to approximately 10 g/d between 2010 and 2014 [1,4]. An estimated US$6 billion of seaweed was produced worldwide in 2003, of which US$5 billion worth was consumed as food products [2]. The increased demand for seaweeds in the last century surpassed the wild stocks of seaweed and more than 95% of the supplies are cultivated nowadays [1,2]. China is the largest producer of edible seaweeds, accounting for over 60% of the world’s production, and Laminaria japonica is the largest cultivated crop in the region [2].

Although seaweeds have not been well known as food outside of Asian cuisine, the potential health benefits of seaweeds are being studied and exploited in dietary supplements. The consumption of seaweeds has been linked to lower incidences of cancer, hyperlipidemia, and coronary heart disease [5,6]. Seaweeds contain many novel polysaccharides that are indigestible by the human body and ferment in the large intestine [1,5], including laminarins, kelp’s namesake storage glucans [7]. These undigested fermentable materials may beneficially affect the intestinal microbiota as prebiotics [1,5,8]. Alginic acid, a soluble fiber in seaweed, has been found to aid in weight loss [9]. In addition, seaweeds are a source of vitamins and mineral nutrients, especially iodine, which is essential for thyroid health [10].

Certified reference materials (CRM) for seaweeds were developed for consumer safety testing and environmental monitoring. Seaweeds are sentinels of environmental pollution because of their structural polysaccharides which sequester metals from the surrounding seawater [11,12,13]. In the aftermath of atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and accidents such as those in Sellafield and Chernobyl, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Standard Reference Material (SRM) 4359 Seaweed Radionuclide Standard and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) CRM IAEA-446 Radionuclides in Baltic Sea Seaweed (Fucus vesticulosus) were issued in 2004 and 2013, respectively, for method validation in the measurements of natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in seaweeds and similar marine specimens. IAEA-140/TM Trace Elements and Methylmercury in Seaweed (Fucus sp.) was released in 1997 and included reference values for 24 elements and methylmercury. The reference values for most of the elements are listed in Table 1. The National Institute of Environmental Studies in Japan produced CRM No. 9 “Sargasso” (Sargassum fulvellum) that was certified for 16 elements. Reference values were provided for an additional 14 elements.

Table 1.

Comparison of certified (bold-type) and reference (normal-type) total mass fraction of elements in SRM 3232 to those in other seaweed certified reference materials in mg/kg. The uncertainties are expanded uncertainties at approximately 95% confidence.

Element SRM 3232 (Thallus laminariae) NIES CRM 9 (Sargassum fulvellum) NMIJ CRM 7504a (Hizikia fusiforme) IAEA140/TM (Fucus sp.) ERM CD200 (Fucus vesticulosus) GBW08521 (Porphyra umbilicalis)
As 38.3±1.3 115±9 35.8±0.9 44.3±2.1 55±4 41±3
Ca 12260±680 13400±500 15200±300 12730±1760
Cd 0.4259±0.0084 0.15±0.02 0.79±0.02 0.537±0.037 0.95±0.06 5.2±0.4
Cr 5.92±0.52 0.2 3.4±0.1 10.4±0.8
Cu 3.875±0.087 4.9±0.2 1.55±0.07 5.05±0.28 1.71±0.18
I 944±88 520
Fe 672±13 187±6 311±11 1256±35
Pb 1.032±0.039 1.35±0.05 0.43±0.03 2.19±0.28 0.51±0.06 0.81±0.03
Mg 6130±180 6500±300 6790±100 9070±880
Mn 24.6±1.6 21.2±1 14.1±0.7 56.1±2.4
Hg 0.1129±0.0032 0.04 0.038±0.006 0.0186±0.0016
Mo 0.2441±0.0091 2.65±0.37
K 76000±1100 61000±2000 47500±700 31100±2600
Na 16330±380 17000±800 16200±200 32000±6600
Zn 27.4±1.1 15.6±1.2 13.4±0.5 47.3±2 25.3±1.7
Al 1070±110 215 147±7 1184±265*
Cl 35600±1200 51000
Co 0.307±0.011 0.12±0.01 1.07±0.06 0.876±0.132
P 4551±51 2600 1010±30
Rb 28.44±0.51 24±2 16.4±2.3
*

Information value.

Around 2011, the National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ) produced NMIJ CRM 7405-a Trace Elements and Arsenic Compounds in Seaweed (Hijiki) that was certified for 18 elements and arsenic acid (AsV) for method validation in food safety measurement [14]. (Hijiki (Hizikia fusiforme) is popular in Japanese diets; however, the Food Standards Agency in the UK advised consumers to avoid consumption of hijiki because it contains high levels of toxic inorganic arsenic [15].) The National Institute of Metrology in China certified 3 elements in GBW08521, a CRM of laver that is also known as nori, gim, and zicai in different parts of the world. The Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) produced European Reference Material (ERM) CD 200, a bladderwrack (Fucus vesticulosus) specimen certified for 7 elements for environmental monitoring and food safety measurements.

All of the above CRMs are based on algae in the order of Fucales except for laver, which is in the order of Bangiales. Missing in the availability of seaweed CRMs is kelp in the order of Laminariales genus Laminaria, one of the most widely cultivated brown algae commodities for food, food ingredients, and dietary supplements [2]. The chemical composition and nutritional value in terms of elemental contents, vitamins, and other bioactive constituents varies widely among seaweed species [10]. Iodine and alginic acid contents in kelp are among the highest in edible seaweeds [10]. Laminarin that was found to possess regenerative properties for skin cells is abundant in kelp [16]. For accurate assessment of nutritional values and toxic impurities in kelp samples, a natural-matrix reference material that matches not only the matrix but also the analyte levels is needed for validation of measurement methods and for quality assurance of the measurement process.

In 2012, NIST and the National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements began a collaboration for the development of SRM 3232 Kelp Powder (Thallus laminariae) to fill the gap in the availability of edible seaweed matrix CRMs and the analytes certified therein. The resulting SRM 3232 became the first seaweed CRM assigned reference values for cis- and trans-vitamin K1 and hydrophilic arsenic species, and the first seaweed CRM certified for the essential nutrient element iodine. SRM 3232 is intended to meet the measurement needs for compliance with the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA), and the current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) to safeguard the consumption of seaweed commodities in Laminaria genus [17]. This paper describes the analytical approach to the measurement and value assignment of Al, As, Cd, Cl, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, I, K, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, P, Pb, Rb, Zn, cis- and trans-vitamin K1, arsenic species, proximates, and calories in SRM 3232 through the use of either a primary method [18] or agreement of results among multiple validated methods in accordance with NIST requirements [19].

Experimental

Sample Collection and Preparation

The kelp used to produce SRM 3232 was harvested from the East China Sea when the kelp was approximately six months old. The pH of the water was between 7.8 and 8.2 and the quality of the water met grade 2 Chinese Seawater Quality Standard (GB 3097-1997) [20]. No other seaweed was grown near the kelp crop and no pesticide was applied during the life cycle of the kelp crop. The thallus was processed into powder that was passed through a 60-mesh sieve. The kelp powder was purchased from the manufacturer Sinochem Ningbo (Ningbo, China) by Modern Nutrition and Biotech (Ridgefield, CT, USA) and was received by NIST directly from the manufacturer in China. The kelp powder was homogenized by blending and was packaged into packets at High-Purity Standards (Charleston, SC). A packet contains approximately 5 g of kelp powder sealed in a nitrogen-flushed plastic bag, which was sealed inside a nitrogen-flushed aluminized polyethylene bag with two packets of silica gel. To prevent mold growth during long-term storage, the packets of kelp powder were irradiated in a single lot at Neutron Products (Dickerson, MD) to an absorbed dose of 5.9 kGy to 7.6 kGy and then were packaged into units of SRM 3232 at NIST.

Correction to a Dry-Mass Basis

The results for the constituents in SRM 3232 are reported on a dry-mass basis, but the SRM was analyzed as received. Separate portions of the SRM were used to determine the moisture content for conversion of the analysis results from an as-received mass basis to a dry-mass basis. Approximately 1.0 g to 1.6 g of the SRM was used to fill the glass weighing vessel to approximately 1 cm in depth, and the content was dried to a constant mass. A constant mass was reached by drying over magnesium perchlorate in a desiccator at room temperature for 28 d or by drying in a forced-air oven at 80 °C for 3 h. The mean values of the two methods were combined to derive the unweighted mean and the expanded uncertainty at approximately 95 % confidence of the dry-mass fraction of 0.9368 g ± 0.0015 g dry-mass per gram of as-received mass. All measurement uncertainties are expanded uncertainties at approximately 95% confidence unless noted otherwise.

Determination of Elements

Value assignment of the mass fractions of the elements was based on NIST measurements using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), isotope dilution ICP-MS (ID-ICP-MS), isotope dilution cold-vapor generation ICP-MS (ID-CV-ICP-MS), and instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA). Veritas redistilled grade nitric acid from GFS Chemicals (Powell, OH, USA) was used in sample preparation for ICP-OES measurements. Optima grade nitric acid, Optima grade hydrofluoric acid, and Optima grade ammonium hydroxide from ThermoFisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) were used in sample preparations for ICP-MS measurements. Puratronic grade ammonium carbonate from Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, MA, USA) was used for buffer preparation. All other chemicals were reagent grade, and 18MΩ cm deionized water was used for dilution.

ICP-OES and ICP-MS methods

For the determination of Ca, Fe, Mg, Mn, P, K, Na, and Zn using PerkinElmer (Shelton, CT, USA) model Optima 3000 Dual View ICP-OES, 0.5 g test portions from ten packets of SRM 3232 were digested in a closed-vessel microwave system using nitric acid. In and Sc were used as internal standards. For ICP-MS determination of As, 0.5 g test portions from six packets of SRM 3232 were digested in a closed-vessel microwave system using nitric acid. Rb and Y were added and the sum of the intensities of 85Rb and 89Y was used as the internal standard for the determination of arsenic in high resolution mode (R≈10,000) by ThermoFisher Scientific model Element XR sector field ICP-MS. Se was used as the internal standard for the determination of arsenic by ThermoFisher Scientific model XseriesII quadrupole ICP-MS. The instrument was operated in collision cell mode using 7% H2 in He as a collision gas. For the determination of iodine by ThermoFisher Scientific model X7 ICP-MS, 0.2 g test potions from eight packets of SRM 3232 were digested in a closed-vessel microwave system using ammonium hydroxide. Rh was used as an internal standard. Quantification for all analyses was based on the method of single-point standard addition using the SRM 3100 series single-element standard solutions for calibration.

ID-CV-ICP-MS method

Test portions of 0.25 g from six packets were digested with an enriched 201Hg isotope in a closed-vessel microwave system using a mixture of hydrochloric acid and nitric acid. The digests were stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C to allow degassing of excess nitrogen dioxide and carbon dioxide overnight. The following day, mercury isotopes were measured in time-resolved-analysis mode using cold vapor generation coupled with a ThermoFisher Scientific model X7 ICP-MS [21].

ID-ICP-MS methods

For the determination of Cr, Cu, and Mo, test portions of 0.5 g from six packets were digested with enriched 53Cr, 65Cu, and 97Mo in a closed-vessel microwave system using a mixture of hydrofluoric acid and nitric acid. The analyte isotopes were measured at mass resolution of approximately 4000 using the Element XR sector-field ICP-MS. For the determination of Cd and Pb, test portions of 0.6 g were digested with enriched 111Cd and 206Pb in a closed-vessel microwave system using a mixture of hydrofluoric acid and nitric acid. The analyte isotopes were measured using a ThermoFisher Scientific XseriesII ICP-MS fitted with matrix-tolerant (Xt) cones. Lead was measured in standard mode, and Cd was measured in collision cell mode with kinetic energy discrimination using 8 % hydrogen in balance helium as the collision gas [22,23].

INAA methods

Test portions of 0.2 g from ten packets were made into 13 mm pellets, sealed in linear polyethylene bags, and irradiated at a neutron flux of 2.4∙1013 cm2s−1 in the RT-2 channel of the NIST Center for Neutron Research [24]. For the determination of Al, Ca, Cl, I, K, Mg, Mn, and Na, the duration of the irradiation was 1 min. Gamma rays were counted for 5 min to 30 min after a 5 min to 3 h decay. For the determination of As, Co, Fe, Rb, and Zn, the duration of the irradiation was 6 h. The samples were rotated 180° after 3 h to ensure a uniform neutron flux for the irradiation. Gamma rays were counted for 2 h to 8 h after a 5 d to 1 month decay. The quantitative evaluation followed the NIST standard comparator method [25].

Determination of Arsenic Species

Value assignment of the mass fractions of arsenic species in SRM 3232 was based on measurements using liquid chromatography followed by off-line INAA determination (LC-INAA) and in-line ICP-MS determination (LC-ICP-MS) [27,28]. CRMs SPEC-AS3 and SPEC-AS5 from Spex CertiPrep (Metuchen, NJ, USA) were used as calibration standards for arsenite (AsIII) and AsV, respectively. High-purity monomethylarsonic acid (MMA) from Chem Service (West Chester, PA, USA), cacodylic acid (DMA) from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA), trimethylarsine oxide (TMAO) from Wako Chemicals (Richmond, VA, USA), and a gift of As(328) (see Figure 1 for nomenclature) from John T. Creed (USEPA, Cincinnati, OH, USA) were characterized for use as calibration standards using a procedure described elsewhere [26]. Briefly, the total arsenic in the calibrant solution was determined by INAA using the same procedure for the determination of arsenic in LC fractions described below. Arsenic impurities in the calibrant solution were determined by LC-ICP-MS. The mass fraction of the analyte arsenic species in the solution was calculated by subtracting the arsenic impurities from the total arsenic.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structural formula and nomenclature for arsenosugars.

Extraction procedure

Test portions of 1 g from eight packets were transferred into 15 mL polypropylene test tubes, into which 10 mL of a solvent containing 50 % volume fraction of methanol in water were added. The contents were vortexed at 40 Hz for 1 min and then allowed to stand on the bench for 2 h at ambient temperature of 21 °C ± 1 °C. The contents were vortexed again at 40 Hz for 30 s and centrifuged at 3600 gn for 30 min. The supernatant was used for speciation measurements by LC-INAA and LC-ICP-MS. The mass of the extracted arsenic species was calculated as the mass concentration of the species in the extract multiplied by the volume of the solvent.

LC-INAA method

From the above extraction procedure, a 0.9 g aliquot of the extract was diluted in a 2 mL vial by weighing into the vial 0.9 mL water and 0.2 mL internal standard. A 5 μg/g MMA solution and a 5 μg/g TMAO solution were used as the internal standards for separation by anion exchange and cation exchange, respectively. A PerkinElmer series 200 LC system consisted of a quaternary pump and an autosampler was used. A 50 μL aliquot of the extract containing the internal standard was injected onto a Macherey-Nagel (Dueren, Germany) Nucleosil 100-5 SA (250 mm × 4 mm, 5 μm), or a Hamilton (Reno, NV, USA) PRP X-100 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 10 μm) column and eluted under isocratic conditions of 1 mL/min using 30 mmol/L pyridine at pH 3.0 or 20 mmol/L ammonium carbonate at pH 9.0, respectively. Arsenic species were quantitatively collected in the fractions of the eluent. The solvent of each fraction was evaporated at 75 °C under a stream of nitrogen. The residue was reconstituted in water and quantitatively transferred to a filter paper, which was dried under an infrared lamp and pressed into a pellet for measurement using the INAA procedure described above [27,28].

LC-ICP-MS method

From the above extraction procedure, a 0.9 g aliquot of the extract was diluted in a 2 mL vial by weighing into the vial 0.9 mL of water and 0.2 mL of 5 μg/g TMAO solution serving as an internal standard. A 0.5 g aliquot of the resulting solution was diluted to 2 g with water to form a measurement sample. A 1 g aliquot of the measurement sample solution was spiked with a 0.3 g standard containing 95 ng/g As(328), 30 ng/g DMA, and 30 ng/g AsV. An unspiked sample was prepared by mixing 1 g of the measurement sample with 0.3 g water. The spiked and the unspiked kelp extract samples were measured for AsIII, AsV, DMA, TMAO, and As(328) by cation exchange LC-ICP-MS using the Nucleosil 100-5 SA column coupled to a PerkinElmer DRCII ICP-MS via a PerkinElmer series 200 autosampler and quaternary pump. An injection of 50 μL sample was eluted at 1 mL/min in the gradient of mobile phases A and B each containing 2% methanol in water in addition to 0.1 mmol/L and 30 mmol/L (pH 3.0) pyridine, respectively. The gradient program was as follows: 0-4 min, isocratic at 100% A; 4-5 min, linear gradient from 100% A to 100% B; 5-20 min isocratic at 100% B; 20-25 min, equilibration at 100% A [27].

Determination of Vitamin K1

Value assignment of total vitamin K1 as a sum of trans-vitamin K1 and cis-vitamin K1 was based on measurements using an isotope dilution liquid chromatography atmospheric pressure chemical ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-APCI-MS/MS) method. The ratio of vitamin K1 isomers in SRM 3232 was determined with the assumption that the instrument response was the same for trans- and cis- isomers. Phylloquinone (vitamin K1) was obtained from ChromaDex (Irvine, CA, USA). Vitamin K1-[2H7] was obtained from Isosciences (King of Prussia, PA). Three independently weighed stock solutions of vitamin K1 and one solution of Vitamin K1-[2H7] were prepared in ethanol. Three calibration solutions were prepared from each stock solution by combining the stock solution and labeled internal standard solution to obtain approximately equal amounts of the labeled and unlabeled forms of the analytes. For sample preparation, test portions of 2.5 g from 10 packets were transferred into 50 mL polyethylene centrifuge tubes containing an appropriate amount of vitamin K1-[2H7] as an internal standard. Thirty milliliters of 30 mg/L butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) in hexane was added as an antioxidant. The samples were sonicated in a water bath for 1 h, mixed on a rotary mixer at 1 Hz for 1 h, and centrifuged at 1400 gn for 15 min, and the hexane was removed from the aqueous solution. Another 30 mL aliquot of hexane was added and the extraction process was repeated three more times. The hexane fractions from the four extraction steps were combined, and 1 g magnesium sulfate was added. The contents were mixed and centrifuged. The hexane phase was decanted into a drying vessel, dried under nitrogen, and the residue was reconstituted in 1.0 mL of 1:1 volume ratio of ethanol:ethyl acetate that contained 30 mg/L BHT. The separation of vitamin K1 isomers was accomplished by eluting with a step gradient of methanol and water at 0.75 mL/min through a 150 mm × 3 mm Accucore (ThermoFisher Scientific) C30 reversed-phase column. Mobile phase A was 95:5 volume ratio of methanol: water. Mobile phase B was methanol. The gradient program was as follows: 0-20 min, isocratic at 100% A; 20-23 min, step gradient at 100% B; 23-27 min, step gradient for equilibration at 100% A. The injection volume was 10 μL. An Applied Biosystems API 5000 LC/MS/MS system (ThermoFisher Scientific) was operated in positive ion mode and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The transitions at m/z 451.4 → m/z 187.3 and at m/z 458.4 → m/z 194.4 were monitored for vitamin K1 and vitamin K1-[2H7], respectively.

Determination of Proximates

Covance Laboratories (Madison, WI, USA) and The National Food Laboratory (Livermore, CA, USA) reported values for ash, protein, total fat, carbohydrates, moisture, and calories. Ash was determined using AOAC methods 923.03 Ash of Flour and 940.26 Ash of Fruits, and Fruit Products. Protein was determined using AOAC 992.15 Crude Protein in Meat and Meat Products Including Pet Foods method. Total Fat was determined using AOAC 922.06 Fat in Flour method. Carbohydrates were calculated per 100 g of the sample minus the sum of moisture, protein, total fat, and ash in the sample, wherein the moisture was measured using AOAC 920.151 Solids (Total) in Fruits and Fruit Products and AOAC 925.09 Solids (Total) and Moisture in Flour. Calories were calculated by summing the caloric equivalents of protein, carbohydrate, and fat according to the Atwater system using the average values of 4 Kcal/g for protein, 4 Kcal/g for carbohydrate, and 9 Kcal/g for fat.

Results and discussion

Mineral nutrients

The Institute of Medicine of the US National Academy of Sciences established Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) to guide health professionals in the United States and Canada in assessing and planning for the nutrient needs of individuals. Sixteen elements are listed as mineral nutrients with DRIs, which include Ca, Cl, Cr, Cu, F, Fe, I, K, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, P, Se, sulfate, and Zn [29]. Seaweed in general is a good source of minerals because structural polysaccharides of seaweed sequester metals, but the mineral composition of seaweed varies with the endogenous factors and the surrounding seawater [13]. Kelp contains abundant alginic acid that is a sequester of alkali metals, while proteins in the seaweed tend to bind with Zn, Cr, and Fe forming metalloproteins [13]. That ion exchange is the main underlying mechanism of bioaccumulation of metals gives rise to positive correlation of mineral contents in the seaweed and the surrounding seawater [13]. This makes seaweed a useful tool for monitoring the marine environment [12]. SRM 3232 is value assigned for 13 of the 16 mineral elements having DRIs, 4 environmental pollutants, and 3 additional elements. Table 1 lists the elemental contents of the SRM together with the values assigned to the seaweed CRMs available worldwide. The certified and the reference values are listed in bold type and normal type, respectively. The certification was based on a primary method or a minimum of two independent NIST methods [19]. According to the definition of the Consultative Committee on Amount of Substance: Metrology in Chemistry and Biology (CCQM), a primary method of measurement is a method having the highest metrological qualities, whose operation can be completely described and understood, for which a complete uncertainty statement can be written down in terms of the International System of Units (SI), and whose results are, therefore, accepted without reference to a standard of the quantity being measured [18]. A primary ratio method, ID-ICP-MS was used to assign the certified values of Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mo, and Pb [2123].

Certification of total mass fraction of As, Ca, Fe, I, K, Mg, Mn, Na, and Zn in SRM 3232 was based on results from two or more independent methods. One of the methods was INAA, which required no sample digestion; the others were ICP-MS or ICP-OES that required mineralization of the kelp sample. The combination of measurement approaches was chosen to ensure orthogonality not only in measurement principles, but also in sample preparations prior to the measurement. Results obtained by multiple independent methods are provided in Table 2. The results of all elements were within 1SD of the method mean except for As and I, suggesting good agreement between methods. For the determination of As, two ICP-MS methods were used in addition to the INAA method. The kelp contains a large amount of Cl as shown in Table 1. Chlorine, which forms 40Ar35Cl+ and 38Ar37Cl+ in the argon plasma, interferes with the determination of monoisotopic 75As by ICP-MS. Hydrogen was used as a collision gas to alleviate the 40Ar35Cl+ and 38Ar37Cl+ interferences, which produced results in agreement within 1SD of those by INAA. Alternatively, the 40Ar35Cl+ and 38Ar37Cl+ interferences can be resolved spectroscopically at mass resolutions of 7770 and 10,600, respectively. Measurements of arsenic in high-resolution mode (R ≈ 10,000) of a sector-field ICP-MS yielded values outside 1SD but within 2SD intervals of results obtained using INAA and quadrupole ICP-MS. There was no technical reason for rejection of sector-field ICP-MS results, so the results of the three methods were combined. The uncertainty of the combined mean was estimated using a bootstrap procedure based on a Gaussian random effects model for the between-method effects [3032]. The expanded uncertainty is 3.4% of the certified value, which is slightly below the average relative expanded uncertainty (REU) of 4.2% for all elements certified by multiple independent methods listed in Table 1. The REU compares favorably to that of the seaweed CRMs listed in Table 1.

Table 2.

Certified values assigned by using multiple independent methods in mg/kg units. The uncertainties are expanded uncertainties at approximately 95% confidence

Method Mean s n RSD% Certified value ± U
As INAA 38.98 0.89 27 2.3 38.3 ± 1.3
ICP-MS 38.95 0.80 6 2.1
ICP-HRMS 36.39 0.94 6 2.6
Ca INAA 12000 650 23 5.4 12260 ± 680
ICP-OES 12570 420 20 3.3
I INAA 899 19 23 2.1 944 ± 88
ICP-MS 990 64 14 6.5
Fe INAA 665 30 27 4.5 672 ± 13
ICP-OES 678 28 20 4.1
Mg INAA 6100 170 23 2.8 6130 ± 180
ICP-OES 6150 280 20 4.6
Mn INAA 23.8 1.2 23 5.2 24.6 ± 1.6
ICP-OES 25.4 1.7 20 6.8
K INAA 76440 700 23 0.9 76000 ± 1100
ICP-OES 75600 2700 19 3.6
Na INAA 16520 170 23 1.0 16330 ± 380
ICP-OES 16140 460 20 2.9
Zn INAA 26.9 1.2 27 4.3 27.4 ± 1.1
ICP-OES 27.97 0.45 20 1.6

Iodine is an essential mineral required in the synthesis of thyroid hormones that regulate metabolism. Iodine intake must be carefully controlled to fall within the DRI range because both severe iodine deficiency and high iodine intake can harm health [29]. Seaweed is a rich source of dietary iodine [33]. Accurate accounting for iodine intake requires the measurement of major sources of iodine in the diet and dietary supplements such as seaweed; yet there is no certified value for iodine in seaweed CRMs that can be used for measurement validation. Iodine in SRM 3232 was determined by ICP-MS and INAA. ICP-MS is one of the most sensitive techniques for the determination of iodine [34]. Thanks to its mid-range atomic mass, iodine is not known to suffer isobaric interferences from plasma ions or solvent. Iodine is difficult to ionize in an argon plasma because of its high ionization potential, and its ionization is affected by the presence of carbon [35]. Therefore, the determination of iodine is susceptible to matrix effects [35,36]. Sample preparation and sample introduction for iodine measurement are also challenges for ICP-MS determination because iodine in oxidizing acid is susceptible to loss as I2 and HI [37,38]. For this work, iodine in kelp was extracted in a closed-vessel microwave using 0.5% volume fraction ammonium hydroxide in water to prevent the loss of iodine due to volatilization. Calibration for the quantification was based on the method of standard addition to circumvent the matrix interferences. In comparison, INAA is described as the gold standard for the determination of iodine in biological samples [39,40]. The nondestructive measurement process ensures that INAA measurement of iodine is not affected by loss of the analyte due to volatility or incomplete extraction of the analyte in sample preparation. Although Na, Cl, and Br contributed to the background of measured iodine at 442.9 keV, the effect on the quantification of the element was negligible because of the high iodine content in the kelp. The replication relative standard deviation (RSD) of INAA implies that the sample inhomogeneity in terms of RSD was <2.1%. Therefore, the 6.5% replication RSD of the ICP-MS measurement was attributable to the ICP-MS measurement approach rather than the kelp material itself. The REU of iodine at 9.3% is the highest of all the certified values in SRM 3232; however, it is rather typical for certified mass fraction values of iodine in food matrices. A search of The European Virtual Institute for Speciation Analysis (EVISA) database using the terms ‘Iodine’ and ‘Certified’ in the Material category returned eleven food CRMs certified for iodine as shown in electronic supplementary Table S1 (DOI 10.18434/M3PM35). The relative expanded uncertainties of the certified value ranged from 8 % to 33% with the mean and median at 17% and 13%, respectively. The REU of iodine in SRM 3232 is below the mean and the medium REU of iodine in all food CRMs. The results suggest that certification of iodine in a food matrix remains a challenge. The certified value of iodine in SRM 3232 is fit for the purpose of method validation for iodine in kelp as food or dietary supplement.

Arsenic species

Arsenic is one of the ten chemicals of major public health concern of the World Health Organization (WHO), and it tops the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry’s (ATSDR) Substance Priority List [41]. The toxicity of arsenic is determined by the speciation of the element. Only the most toxic inorganic arsenic species AsIII and AsV in food and drink are regulated [42]. Seaweeds contain large amount of arsenic as shown in Table 1, and kelp is no exception. Arsenic from a kelp dietary supplement was suggested to have caused toxicosis in a patient suffering from diarrhea, nausea, headache, vomiting, and weakness [43]. The case for arsenic intoxication was disputed in the subsequent correspondences because the speciation of arsenic in question was not presented in the publication, and an overdose of iodine in the kelp supplement could have caused the same symptoms [43]. It is evident that iodine intake must be controlled, and the information on the speciation of arsenic in the supplement is essential for toxicological assessment.

The efforts to meet the needs in the measurement of arsenic species in seaweeds were evident by the activities in ring trials and development of reference materials. In their 2005 publication, Raab and coworkers reviewed the results of an interlaboratory study for the measurement of seven seaweed specimens that showed identification of arsenic species to be a challenge [44]. In a more recent interlaboratory comparison of kelp measurement, participants reported results of AsIII, AsV, MMA, DMA, and arsenobetaine; however, none of the participants identified or quantified the most abundant arsenic species, i.e., arsenosugars [45]. Much of the difficulty in the identification and quantification of arsenosugars can be attributed to a lack of pure compounds for these species, because the retention time of the species used by many participants as the basis for identification was not sufficient for arsenosugars [44,46]. To advance the research of arsenic speciation of arsenosugars, Francesconi et al. developed an extract of algal (Fucus serratus) with reference values assigned for four arsenosugars As(328), As(482), As(392), and As(408) [47]. NMIJ CRM 7405-a is the first seaweed certified for AsV.

A common challenge in the determination of arsenic species in seaweed is that not all arsenic is extractable, and the extraction efficiency for a species is dependent on the solvent [44,48]. To prevent species conversion and to maximize the extraction efficiency of both the most toxic inorganic arsenic species and the most abundant arsenosugar species [49,50], a mild solvent consisting a mixture of methanol and water is frequently used in the determination of arsenic species in seaweeds [46,51,52]. LC-ICP-MS is used almost exclusively for the determination of arsenic species because of its sensitivity and selectivity; however, a lack of pure compounds for calibration of measurements hampers the accuracy in the LC-ICP-MS measurement of arsenosugars [28]. Gamma-ray spectroscopy of an element is not affected by the valence state of the analyte. Therefore, an inorganic arsenic primary standard can be used to calibrate INAA for the determination of organoarsenic, including arsenosugars, and the results of the measurement are traceable to the inorganic arsenic primary standard [28]. For this work, fractions of LC eluent containing isolated arsenic species were collected, transferred to filter papers that were pressed into pellets, and measured by INAA. Calibration for the INAA was accomplished using the characterized MMA and TMAO that served as the internal standards in the anion exchange and cation exchange LC separation, respectively. Figure 2 shows the timing for collecting blank, DMA, As(482), As(392), and MMA fractions from the eluent of the anion exchange separation method for quantification by INAA using the MMA fraction as the calibrant. The eluent corresponding to As(328) retention time was not collected because an unknown component U1 cannot be excluded from the As(328) by the fraction collection approach. A pure fraction of As(328) was collected from the eluent of the cation exchange method as shown in Figure 3, which was quantified by INAA using the TMAO fraction as the calibrant [27]. Table 3 lists the results of DMA, As(328), As(482), and As(392) obtained by LC-INAA. LC-ICP-MS was used as the second method for the determination of AsV, MMA, and As(328) because the calibration standards for these species were available. The results of the measurement are listed in Table 3. DMA and As(328) were measured by LC-INAA and LC-ICP-MS. The results for these two analytes were in good agreement as indicated by the means of the two methods being within 1SD of each other. The replication uncertainty of LC-INAA was nearly an order of magnitude larger than that of LC-ICP-MS because the detection limit of the former was approximately an order of magnitude higher than the latter [28]. Like the inorganic arsenic species found in NMIJ CRM 7405-a hijiki, AsV was the only inorganic arsenic species detected in the kelp. Although the total arsenic mass fractions in SRM 3232 and CRM 7405-a are similar at (38.3 ± 1.3) mg/kg and (35.8±0.9) mg/kg, respectively, the contents of AsV differ by more than an order of magnitude at (0.247 ± 0.019) mg/kg and (10.1 ± 0.5) mg/kg, respectively. The large difference in the contents of arsenic species in the seaweed species reiterates the need for the species-specific reference material of frequently consumed seaweeds.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Timing for collecting arsenic species from the eluent of the anion exchange method for INAA measurement.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Timing for collecting As(328) from the eluent of the cation exchange method for INAA measurement.

Table 3.

Mass fraction of arsenic species and Vitamin K1 in SRM 3232 by method. The uncertainties are expanded uncertainties at approximately 95% confidence.

Analyte Method Average s n Reference Value
DMA LC-INAA 0.44 0.13 14 0.479 ± 0.077
LC-ICP-MS 0.517 0.029 8
As(328) LC-INAA 1.18 0.26 16 1.20 ± 0.14
LC-ICP-MS 1.216 0.021 8
As(482) LC-INAA 5.59 0.31 15 5.59 ± 0.51
As(392) LC-INAA 14.06 1.03 14 14.06 ± 0.72
AsV LC-ICP-MS 0.247 0.023 8 0.247 ± 0.019
Total Vitamin K1 LC-MS/MS 0.431 0.013 20 0.431 ± 0.081
cis-Vitamin K1 LC-MS/MS 0.0353 0.0012 20 0.0353 ± 0.0067
trans-Vitamin K1 LC-MS/MS 0.396 0.012 20 0.396 ± 0.075

Vitamin K1

Vitamin K functions as a coenzyme for blood coagulation and bone metabolism, and it is one of the essential vitamins with a DRI [29]. NIST issued certified values of total vitamin K1 in SRM 3280 Multivitamin/Multielement Tablets and SRM 1849 Infant/Adult Nutritional Formula. An LC/MS method was used to determination the total vitamin K1 in the two SRMs [53]. Vitamin K1 exists in cis- and trans-forms, and the bioactivities of the two isomers are different with the former being practically inactive [54]. The isomers must be determined to accurately assess the nutritional value of a diet component. The C18 reversed-phase column used in the LC/MS analyses of SRMs 3280 and 1849, which are fortified with vitamin K1, was not capable of separating the isomers of vitamin K1. A method was developed to separate isomers of vitamin K1 in SRM 3232 using a C30 column similar to that reported in the literature [55,56]. Baseline separation of the isomers was achieved under isocratic conditions in 100 % mobile phase A. To ensure stability of retention time and signal intensity, a step gradient of 100 % methanol was added to remove residues from the kelp matrix from the column. Figure 4 is a typical chromatogram of vitamin K1 in samples of SRM 3232. A small shift in retention time was observed for the peaks in the labeled internal standard relative to those of vitamin K1 because of the isotopic labeling. Most of the vitamin K1 in SRM 3232 was found to be trans-isomer, which was consistent with the predominance of the isomer found in nature [57]. Table 3 lists the reference values assigned for vitamin K1 and its isomers in SRM 3232. In comparison to the previous efforts that resulted in the certifications of fortified total vitamin K1 in SRM 3280 and SRM 1849, SRM 3232 is the first SRM value-assigned for isomers of endogenous vitamin K1 that would meet the needs of more accurate assessment of nutritional values of vitamin K1 in dietary supplements.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A typical LC-MS/MS chromatogram of an SRM 3232 sample displaying the separation of the isomers. The solid line and the dotted line are the vitamin K1 and the vitamin K1-[2H7] labeled internal standard, respectively.

Proximates

Proximates are ash, moisture, proteins, fat, and carbohydrates, which provide a broad classification of food components [58]. The information about their content is used on labels for packaged food per FDA regulation under the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 (NLEA) [59]. Table 4 lists the values of proximates in SRM 3232 provided by two collaborating laboratories. Except for total fat, the repeatability uncertainty within each lab was <2% RSD for all proximates. The repeatability RSD for fat was 3% and 20% for labs 1 and 2, respectively. Because of the low within-lab replication uncertainties, the between-lab bias was the primary source of uncertainty for the reference value of all proximates. Still, the relative expanded uncertainties are <7% for all proximates except fat, which is the minor component at (2.4±1.3) %.

Table 4.

Mass fraction value of proximates in SRM 3232 by lab. The uncertainties are expanded uncertainties at approximately 95% confidence.

Lab ID Mean s (n=4) Reference Value
Ash (%) 1 23.27 0.09 23.55±0.57
2 23.84 0.08
Carbohydrate (%) 1 57.2 0.1 56.7±1.0
2 56.2 1.0
Protein (%) 1 14.94 0.13 14.48±0.98
2 13.98 0.09
Total Fat (%) 1 1.71 0.05 2.4±1.3
2 3.06 0.62
Calories (kcal/100 g) 1 304.2 0.0 306.2±4.0
2 308.3 2.2

Homogeneity

The homogeneity of analytes was assessed using graphical analysis and analysis of variance at a 5% significance level based on INAA, ID-ICP-MS, ID-CV-ICP-MS, and ICP-OES, LC-INAA, and ID-LC-MS/MS measurements using two to ten test portions per packet from six to ten packets. There was no detectable inhomogeneity for elements and arsenic species. For the values related to vitamin K1, the uncertainty incorporates a component for possible inhomogeneity based on the standard deviation of replications. No homogeneity assessment measurements were made for proximates; however, results of proximates were treated as if they were distributed homogenously.

Conclusion

SRM 3232 Kelp Powder (Thallus laminariae) is the most characterized seaweed CRM in the order of Laminariales. The SRM fills the gap in reference values for vitamin K1 and arsenosugars, and certified value for iodine in seaweed measurements. The SRM will be useful for method validation and quality assurance in measurements of nutritional and toxic contents of kelp in diet and dietary supplements.

Supplementary Material

Table S1

Acknowledgments

Support for the development of SRM 3232 was provided in part by the Office of Dietary Supplements of the National Institutes of Health (NIH-ODS). A gift of arsenosugar As(328) from Dr. John T. Creed of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory in Cincinnati, OH is gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

Compliance with Ethical Standards: The authors certify that they have no conflict of interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. No animal or human subject was used in the work related to this manuscript.

Disclaimer: Certain commercial items are identified in this paper to specify adequately the experimental procedure. Such identification does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the equipment identified is necessarily the best for the purpose.

References

  • 1.Wells ML, Potin P, Craigie JS, Raven JA, Merchant SS, Helliwell KE, Smith AG, Camire ME, Brawley SH. Algae as nutritional and functional food sources: revisiting our understanding. J Appl Phycol. 2017;29:949–982. doi: 10.1007/s10811-016-0974-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McHugh DJ. A guide to the seaweed industry FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 441 Rome. Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yoshinaga J, Morita M, Yukawa M, Shiraishi K, Kawamura H. Certified reference material for analytical quality assurance of minor and trace elements in food and related matrixes based on a typical Japanese diet: interlaboratory study. J AOAC Int. 2001;84:1202–1208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Matsumura Y. Nutrition trends in Japan. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2001;10:S40–S47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brown EM, Allsopp PJ, Magee PJ, Gill CIR, Nitecki S, Strain CS, McSorley EM. Seaweed and human health. Nutr Rev. 2014;72:205–216. doi: 10.1111/nure.12091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Park EJ, Pezzuto JM. Antioxidant marine products in cancer chemoprevention. Antiox Redox Signal. 2013;19:115–138. doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gupta S, Abu-Ghannam N. Bioactive potential and possible health effects of edible brown seaweeds. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2011;22:315–326. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jeménez-Escrig A, Gómez-Ordónez E, Tenorio MD, Rupérez P. Antioxidant and prebiotic effects of dietary fiber co-travelers from sugar Kombu in healthy rats. J Appl Phycol. 2013;25:503–512. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jensen MG, Petersen C, Kristensen M, Frost G, Astrup A. Review: efficacy of alginate supplementation in relation to appetite regulation and metabolic risk factors: evidence from animal and human studies. Obes Rev. 2013;14:129–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01056.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.MacArtain P, Gill CIR, Brooks M, Camell R, Rowland IR. Nutritional value of edible seaweeds. Nutr Rev. 2007;65:535–543. doi: 10.1301/nr.2007.dec.535-543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Outola I, Filliben J, Inn KGW, LaRosa J, McMahon CA, Peck GA, Twining J, Tims SG, Fifield LK, Smedley P, Anton MP, Gasco C, Povinec P, Pham MK, Raaum A, Wei H-J, Krijger GC, Bouisset P, Litherland AE, Kieser WE, Betti M, Aldave de las Heras L, Hong GH, Holm E, Skipperud L, Dahlgaard H, Croudae IW, Warwick PE, Ikaheimonen TK, Klemola S, Vakulovsky M, Sanchez-Cabeza JA. Characterization of the NIST seaweed standard reference material. Appl Radiat Isot. 2006;64:1242–1247. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Reis PA, Cassiano J, Veiga P, Rubal M, Sousa-Pinto I. Fucus spiralis as monitoring tool of metal contamination in the northwest coast of Portugal under the European Water Framework Directives. Environ Monit Assess. 2014;186:5447–5460. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-3794-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mišurcová L, Machů L, Orsavová J. Seaweed minerals as nutraceuticals. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2011;64:371–390. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-387669-0.00029-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Narukawa T, Inagaki K, Zhu Y, Kuroiwa T, Narushima I, Chiba K, Hioki A. Preparation and certification of Hijiki reference material, NMIJ CRM 7405-a, from the edible marine algae hijiki (Hizikia fusiforme) Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;402:1713–1722. doi: 10.1007/s00216-011-5584-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hijiki: your questions answered. Food Standards Agency; UK: https://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/hijikiqanda [Cited 8 October 2017] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yvin J-C, LeVasseur F, Hud’Homme F. Use of laminarin and oligosaccharides derived therefrom in cosmetics and for preparing a skin treatment drug. 5,980,916 United States Patent. 1999
  • 17.Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994. https://ods.od.nih.gov/About/DSHEA_Wording.aspx#sec6 and Guidance for Industry: Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Packaging, Labeling, or Holding Operations for Dietary Supplements; Small Entity Compliance Guide December 2010. https://www.fda.gov/food/guidanceregulation/guidancedocumentsregulatoryinformation/dietarysupplements/ucm238182.htm [Cited 8 October 2017]
  • 18.Davis RS. The fourth meeting of the CCQM, February 1998. Accred Qual Assur. 1998;3:502–503. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.May W, Parris R, Beck C, Fassett J, Greenberg R, Guenther F, Kramer G, Wise S, Gills T, Colbert J, Gettings R, MacDonald B. ST special publication 260–136. Washington, D.C: US Government Printing Office; 2000. Definitions of terms and modes used at NIST for value assignment of reference materials for chemical measurements. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sea water quality standard (GB 3097-1997) http://english.mep.gov.cn/standards_reports/standards/water_environment/quality_standard/200710/W020061027511546974673.pdf (in Chinese) http://www.chinesestandard.net/PDF-Excerpt/ShowPDFexcerpt.aspx?ExcerptID=GB%203097-1997 (in English) [Cited 8 October 2017]
  • 21.Long SE, Kelly WR. Determination of mercury in coal by isotope dilution cold-vapor generation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2002;74:1477–1483. doi: 10.1021/ac010954n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Murphy KE, Beary ES, Rearick MS, Vocke RD. Isotope dilution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ID ICP-MS) for the certification of lead and cadmium in environmental standard reference materials. Fresenius J Anal Chem. 2000;368:362–370. doi: 10.1007/s002160000454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Murphy KE, Vetter TW. Recognizing and overcoming analytical error in the use of ICP-MS for the determination of cadmium in breakfast cereal and dietary supplements. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013;405:4579–4588. doi: 10.1007/s00216-013-6855-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Becker DA. 30 years of reactor characterization on the NBSR. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2000;244:361–365. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Greenberg RR, Fleming RF, Zeisler R. High sensitivity neutron activation analysis of environmental and biological Standard Reference Materials. Environ Int. 1984;10:129–136. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Davis WC, Zeisler R, Sieber JR, Yu LL. Methods for the separation and quantification of arsenic species in SRM 2669: arsenic species in frozen human urine. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;396:3041–3050. doi: 10.1007/s00216-010-3541-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yu LL, Stanoyevitch RC, Zeisler R. SI traceable determination of arsenic species in kelp (Thallus laminariae) Anal Methods. 2017;9:4267–4274. doi: 10.1039/C7AY01111C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yu LL, Chao W, Zeisler R, Tong J, Oflaz R, Bao H, Wang J. An approach for identification and determination of arsenic species in the extract of kelp. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015;407:3517–3524. doi: 10.1007/s00216-015-8567-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Otten JJ, Hellwig JP, Meyers LD. Dietary Reference Intakes: The Essential Guide to Nutrient Requirements. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.JCGM100:2008. Evaluation of Measurement Data—Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (ISO GUM 1995 with Minor Corrections) Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. 2008 available at http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf [Cited 8 October 2017];; see also; Taylor BN, Kuyatt CE. NIST Technical Note 1297. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1994. Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results. available at http://www.nist.gov/pml/pubs/tn1297/index.cfm [Cited 8 October 2017] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.JCGM101:2008. Evaluation of Measurement Data – Supplement 1 to the Guide to Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. Propagation of Distributions Using a Monte Carlo Method; Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. 2008 available at http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_101_2008_E.pdf [Cited 8 October 2017]
  • 32.Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. London, UK: Chapman & Hall; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Iodine – Fact Sheet for Health Professionals, National Institute of Health Office of Dietary Supplements. https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/Iodine-HealthProfessional/ [Cited 8 October 2017]
  • 34.Oliveira AA, Trevizan LC, Nobrega JA. REVIEW: Iodine determination by inductively coupled plasma spectrometry. Appl Spectrosc Rev. 2010;45:447–473. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Grindlay G, Mora J, De Loos-Vollebregt M, Vanhaecke F. A systematic study on the influence of carbon on the behavior of hard-to-ionize elements in inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Spectrochim Acta B. 2013;86:42–49. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Larsen EH, Ludwigsen MB. Determination of iodine in food-related certified reference materials using wet ashing and detection by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J Anal At Spectrom. 1997;12:435–439. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Todorov TI, Gray PJ. Analysis of iodine in food samples by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Food Addit Contam Part A. 2016;33:282–290. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2015.1131337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mesko MF, Costa VC, Picoloto RS, Bizzi CA, Mello PA. Halogen determination in food and biological materials using plasma-based techniques: challenges and trends of sample preparation. J Anal At Spectrom. 2016;31:1243–2161. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shelor CP, Dasgupta PK. Review of analytical methods for the quantification of iodine in complex matrices. Anal Chim Acta. 2011;702:16–36. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2011.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kučera J, Řanda Z, Soukal L. A comparison of three activation analysis methods for iodine determination in foodstuffs. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2001;249:61–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.WHO ten chemicals of major public health concern. http://www.who.int/ipcs/assessment/public_health/chemicals_phc/en/ [Cited 8 October 2017] and ATSDR’s Substance Priority List https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/spl/index.html [Cited 8 October 2017]
  • 42.EPA Drinking Water Requirements for States and Public Water Systems. https://www.epa.gov/dwreginfo/chemical-contaminant-rules [Cited 8 October 2017]. FDA proposes limit for inorganic arsenic in infant rice cereal https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm493740.htm [Cited 8 October 2017]. FDA action level for arsenic in apple juice https://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodborneIllnessContaminants/Metals/ucm280209.htm [Cited 8 October 2017]
  • 43.Amster E, Tiwary A, Schenker MB. Case report: potential arsenic toxicosis secondary to herbal kelp supplement. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:606–608. A574–A577. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Raab A, Fecher P, Feldmann J. Determination of Arsenic in Algae – Results of an Interlaboratory Trial: Determination of Arsenic Species in the Water-Soluble Fraction. Microchim Acta. 2005;151:153–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Briscoe ML, Ugrai TM, Crewell J, Carter AT. An interlaboratory comparison study for the determination of arsenic and arsenic species in rice, kelp, and apple juice. Spectrosc. 2015;30 http://www.spectroscopyonline.com/print/292389?page=full [Cited 8 October 2017] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gallagher PA, Wei X, Shoemaker JA, Brockhoff CA, Creed JT. Detection of arsenosugars from kelp extracts via IC-electrospray ionization-MS-MS and IC membrane hydride generation ICP-MS. J Anal At Spectrom. 1999;14:1829–1834. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Madsen AD, Goessler W, Pedersen SN, Francesconi KA. Characterization of an algal extract by HPLC-ICP-MS and LC-electrospray MS for use in arsenosugar speciation studies. J Anal At Spectrom. 2000;15:657–662. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Taylor V, Goodale B, Raab A, Schwerdtle T, Reimer K, Conklin S, Karagas MR, Francesconi KA. Human exposure to organic arsenic species from seafood. Sci Total Environ. 2017;580:266–282. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gamble BM, Gallagher PA, Shoemaker JA, Parks AN, Wei X, Schwegel CA, Creed JT. An investigation of the chemical stability of arsenosugars in simulated gastric juice and acidic environments using IC-ICP-MS and IC-ESI-MS/MS. Analyst. 2002;127:781–785. doi: 10.1039/b109748b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gamble BM, Gallagher PA, Shoemaker JA, Parks AN, Freeman DM, Schwegel CA, Creed JT. An investigation of the chemical stability of arsenosugars in basic environments using IC-ICP-MS and IC-ESI-MS/MS. Analyst. 2003;128:1458–1461. doi: 10.1039/b306931a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yoshinaga J, Shibata Y, Horiguchi T, Morita M. NIES certified reference materials for arsenic speciation. Accredit Qual Assur. 1997;2:154–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Van Hulle M, Zhang C, Zhang X, Cornelis R. Arsenic speciation in Chinese seaweeds using HPLC-ICP-MS and HPLC-ES-MS. Analyst. 2002;127:634–640. doi: 10.1039/b110940e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Phinney KW, Rimmer CA, Thomas JB, Sander LC, Sharpless KE, Wise SA. Isotope dilution liquid chromatography – mass spectrometry methods for fat- and water-soluble vitamins in nutritional formulations. Anal Chem. 2011;83:92–98. doi: 10.1021/ac101950r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lowenthal J, Vergel Rivera GM. Comparison of the activity of the cis and trans isomer of vitamin K1 in vitamin K-deficient and coumarin anticoagulant-pretreated Rats. J Pharm Exp Ther. 1979;209:330–333. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Huang B, Zheng F, Fu S, Yao J, Tao B, Ren Y. UPLC-ESI-MS/MS for determining trans- and cis-vitamin K1 in infant formulas: method and applications. Eur Food Res Technol. 2012;235:873–879. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lee H, Lee J, Choi K, Kim B. Development of isotope dilution-liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry for the accurate determination of trans- and cis-vitamin K1 isomers in infant formula. Food Chem. 2017;221:729–736. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Woollard DC, Indyk HE, Fong BY, Cook KK. Determination of vitamin K1 isomers in foods by liquid chromatography with C30 bonded-phase column. J AOAC Int. 2002;85:682–691. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Greenfield H, Southgate DAT. Food composition data: production, management, and use. 2. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bender MM, Rader JI, McClure FD. US Food and Drug Administration; 1998. Guidance for Industry: Nutrition Labeling Manual - A Guide for Developing and Using Data Bases. https://www.fda.gov/food/guidanceregulation/guidancedocumentsregulatoryinformation/labelingnutrition/ucm063113.htm#N_1_ [Cited 8 October 2017] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1

RESOURCES