Table 3. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of the most common isolates including the ESBL-producing ones, from intra-abdominal infections and urinary-tract infections, from SMART study in Mexico from 2009 to 2015.
Pathogen | % Susceptibility | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETP | IMP | TZP | SAM | FOX | CAZ | CRO | CTX | FEP | LVX | CIP | AMK | |
Escherichia coli | 99 | 99 | 87 | 22 | 79 | 50 | 45 | 45 | 48 | 37 | 36 | 97 |
Escherichia coli, ESBL | 99 | 99 | 81 | 6 | 72 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 11 | 94 |
Escherichia coli, non ESBL | 100 | 99 | 92 | 37 | 85 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 96 | 62 | 60 | 99 |
Klebsiella pneumoniae | 97 | 98 | 85 | 47 | 88 | 62 | 56 | 57 | 60 | 80 | 64 | 96 |
Klebsiella pneumoniae, ESBL | 98 | 100 | 70 | 7 | 87 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 64 | 27 | 93 |
Klebsiella pneumoniae, non ESBL | 97 | 96 | 94 | 77 | 89 | 95 | 92 | 94 | 97 | 93 | 90 | 98 |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 0 | 62 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 58 | 59 | 70 |
Acinetobacter baumannii | 0 | 23 | 11 | 25 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 19 |
Enterobacter cloacae | 84 | 98 | 67 | 25 | 5 | 55 | 51 | 52 | 67 | 89 | 85 | 93 |
Proteus mirabilis | 100 | 34 | 98 | 76 | 98 | 98 | 92 | 96 | 94 | 89 | 72 | 100 |
Proteus mirabilis, ESBL | 100 | 0 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 100 |
Proteus mirabilis, non ESBL | 100 | 35 | 98 | 76 | 98 | 100 | 94 | 98 | 96 | 90 | 74 | 100 |
Klebsiella oxytoca | 100 | 96 | 90 | 57 | 93 | 82 | 75 | 77 | 82 | 74 | 73 | 100 |
Klebsiella oxytoca, ESBL | 100 | 100 | 69 | 0 | 85 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 23 | 15 | 100 |
Klebsiella oxytoca, non ESBL | 100 | 95 | 96 | 71 | 94 | 97 | 94 | 97 | 99 | 87 | 87 | 100 |
ETP: ertapenem, IMP: imipenem, TZP: Piperacillin-Tazobactam, SAM: Ampicillin-Sulbactam, FOX: cefoxitin, CAZ: ceftazidime, CRO: ceftriaxone, CTX: cefotaxime, FEP: cefepime, LVX: levofloxacin, CIP: ciprofloxacin and AMK: amikacin. These MIC breakpoints have not been defined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.