Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 21;13(6):e0198525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198525

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Showing the Degree distribution i.e P(k) vs. k graph, After Knock out experiment at 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100 nodes removal and it is also fitted to the power law with exponent γ falling in range of Characteristic Heirarchial Networks i.e. (0 ≤ γ ≤ 2); Showing the Clustering Co-efficient i.e C(k) vs. k graph; After Knock out experiment at 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100 nodes removal and it is also fitted to the power law with exponent α falling in range of Characteristic Heirarchial Networks i.e. (α ~ 1); Showing the Avg Neibourhood Connectivity i.e Cn(k) vs. k graph; After Knock out experiment at 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100 nodes removal and it is also fitted to the power law with exponent β falling in range of Characteristic Heirarchial Networks i.e. (β ≤ 1), Showing the Betweeness Centrality, Closeness Centrality and Eigenvector Centrality i.e Cb, Cc and Ce vs. k graph respectively, After Knock out experiment at 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100 nodes removal and it is also fitted to the power law with exponent ϵ, δ and μ in order.